Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General talk
  3. The Lounge
  4. Hidden features of C++
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Hidden features of C++

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved The Lounge
19 Posts 7 Posters 2.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • VRoninV Offline
    VRoninV Offline
    VRonin
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    If you want to have more fun: https://www.ioccc.org/years.html
    For example: https://www.ioccc.org/2018/burton1/prog.nowarn.c

    "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
    ~Napoleon Bonaparte

    On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • fcarneyF Offline
      fcarneyF Offline
      fcarney
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      Here is another interesting site:
      http://madebyevan.com/obscure-cpp-features/

      C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • JonBJ Offline
        JonBJ Offline
        JonB
        wrote on last edited by JonB
        #11
        i[str] = (i2-i)[str2];
        

        I'm going to throw this in here, and doubtless wait for others to disagree: I think the compiler should generate a warning on i[str]. Do I realize it's the same as str[i] --- yes, I do. Do I realize it's just the same as *(i + str), which I wouldn't complain about --- yes, I do. Bit I'd still like to see a friendly, 2019, open source compiler warning about i not being indexable....

        EDIT "I think the compiler should": maybe I meant "I expected the compiler to"....

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • fcarneyF Offline
          fcarneyF Offline
          fcarney
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          @JonB said in Hidden features of C++:

          doubtless wait for others to disagree

          Or the obligatory "My <insert language> doesn't do this. That is why it is superior."
          cough cough rust cough cough... ;)

          (disclaimer: I have never programmed rust)

          C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • fcarneyF Offline
            fcarneyF Offline
            fcarney
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Now I am kinda scared:

            qInfo() << 3<:"Foobar"];
            

            Outputs 'b'.
            But this:

            std::cout << 3<:"Foobar"];
            

            Crashes

            I am really struggling as to how that translates to an index in the first case, but crashes in the second case.

            C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

            fcarneyF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fcarneyF fcarney

              Now I am kinda scared:

              qInfo() << 3<:"Foobar"];
              

              Outputs 'b'.
              But this:

              std::cout << 3<:"Foobar"];
              

              Crashes

              I am really struggling as to how that translates to an index in the first case, but crashes in the second case.

              fcarneyF Offline
              fcarneyF Offline
              fcarney
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              @fcarney said in Hidden features of C++:

              std::cout << 3<:"Foobar"];

              Nevermind, it needs "\n" to output. It was crashing cause I was killing it... doh! I rarely use cout anymore.

              C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

              fcarneyF 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • fcarneyF fcarney

                @fcarney said in Hidden features of C++:

                std::cout << 3<:"Foobar"];

                Nevermind, it needs "\n" to output. It was crashing cause I was killing it... doh! I rarely use cout anymore.

                fcarneyF Offline
                fcarneyF Offline
                fcarney
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                Also,
                digraphs

                Why? Why?!

                C++ is a perfectly valid school of magic.

                kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • fcarneyF fcarney

                  Also,
                  digraphs

                  Why? Why?!

                  kshegunovK Offline
                  kshegunovK Offline
                  kshegunov
                  Moderators
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  @fcarney said in Hidden features of C++:

                  digraphs

                  That's some bag-o-worms. My advice - don't dig there.

                  Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Kent-DorfmanK Offline
                    Kent-DorfmanK Offline
                    Kent-Dorfman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    I think the take-away from this discussion is that if you want to write code to really piss off someone else who has to read or maintain it then use C++.

                    JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • Kent-DorfmanK Kent-Dorfman

                      I think the take-away from this discussion is that if you want to write code to really piss off someone else who has to read or maintain it then use C++.

                      JonBJ Offline
                      JonBJ Offline
                      JonB
                      wrote on last edited by JonB
                      #18

                      @Kent-Dorfman
                      No, C++ readability/maintenance has nothing on this little gem language, which has always been a favorite of mine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck. Here, for example, is Hello World! in its entirety:

                      ++++++++[>++++[>++>+++>+++>+<<<<-]>+>+>->>+[<]<-]>>.>---.+++++++..+++.>>.<-.<.+++.------.--------.>>+.>++.
                      

                      And you can go to https://sange.fi/esoteric/brainfuck/impl/interp/i.html to paste it in and run :)

                      ODБOïO 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • JonBJ JonB

                        @Kent-Dorfman
                        No, C++ readability/maintenance has nothing on this little gem language, which has always been a favorite of mine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck. Here, for example, is Hello World! in its entirety:

                        ++++++++[>++++[>++>+++>+++>+<<<<-]>+>+>->>+[<]<-]>>.>---.+++++++..+++.>>.<-.<.+++.------.--------.>>+.>++.
                        

                        And you can go to https://sange.fi/esoteric/brainfuck/impl/interp/i.html to paste it in and run :)

                        ODБOïO Offline
                        ODБOïO Offline
                        ODБOï
                        wrote on last edited by ODБOï
                        #19

                        @JonB there is also Malbolge, but i don't thik this languages are designed to write real programs.

                        hello world

                        ('&%:9]!~}|z2Vxwv-,POqponl$Hjig%eB@@>}=<M:9wv6WsU2T|nm-,jcL(I&%$#"
                        `CB]V?Tx<uVtT`Rpo3NlF.Jh++FdbCBA@?]!~|4XzyTT43Qsqq(Lnmkj"Fhg${z@>
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1

                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups
                        • Search
                        • Get Qt Extensions
                        • Unsolved