Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Minimizing Vertical Spacing in QGridLayout
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Minimizing Vertical Spacing in QGridLayout

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved General and Desktop
29 Posts 4 Posters 15.4k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Absurd

    @J-Hilk see what I wrote above:

    @Absurd said in Minimizing Vertical Spacing in QGridLayout:

    I did nothing special on the QGridLayout nor on the QLineEdit...
    You can see the constructor for the main Widget above (PacketHeader), and even when commenting all size-related lines in the Bit constructor (which is actually a QLineEdit):

    Bit::Bit(QWidget* parent) : QLineEdit(parent) {
        QFont font("Courier New", 10, QFont::Bold);
        setFont(font);
        //setMaxLength(1);
        setFrame(false);
        //setFixedWidth(16);
        setAlignment(Qt::AlignCenter);
        setText("0");
    }
    

    I am still left with this:
    0_1544962979993_ca034ea7-e723-452e-acf2-013c272ace57-image.png

    Here's the main entry for the window, in case anyone kindly wants to try running:

    int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
        QApplication app(argc, argv);
    
        PacketHeader element;
        element.show();
    
        return app.exec();
    }
    

    Thanks.

    edit
    My goal is to have 4 x 32 one-character boxes such that the boxes will be packed together with no space between them.

    edit 2
    mrjj, I am guessing that you are using some kind of Designer Tool, can you please share the code that's generated? Maybe I can take a look at it as a reference to understand what I am doing wrong...

    Specifically:

    and even when commenting all size-related lines in the Bit constructor

    J.HilkJ Offline
    J.HilkJ Offline
    J.Hilk
    Moderators
    wrote on last edited by J.Hilk
    #19

    @Absurd

    #include <QGridLayout>
    #include <QLineEdit>
    #include <QSpacerItem>
    
    Widget::Widget(QWidget *parent)
        : QWidget(parent)
    {
        QGridLayout *gLay = new QGridLayout(this);
        gLay->setSpacing(0);
        gLay->setMargin(0);
    
        for(int i(0); i < 4; i++){
            for(int j(0); j < 32; j++) {
                if( j == 0 || j == 31){
                    gLay->addItem(new QSpacerItem(0,0,QSizePolicy::Expanding, QSizePolicy::Minimum),i,j);
                } else {
                    QLineEdit *le = new QLineEdit(this);
                    le->setMaxLength(1);
                    le->setFixedWidth(16);
                    le->setAlignment(Qt::AlignCenter);
                    le->setText("0");
                    gLay->addWidget(le,i,j,1,1, Qt::AlignCenter);
                }
            }
        }
    }
    

    works fine for me:

    0_1545038347999_e912c7fe-8088-4e3a-a8ca-1fe85fca4538-image.png

    0_1545038365685_84906f62-49d6-4ce4-b3e2-f5bde4ebcaaf-image.png


    ups, j should run to 34 so that there are 32 QLineEdits.


    Be aware of the Qt Code of Conduct, when posting : https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct


    Q: What's that?
    A: It's blue light.
    Q: What does it do?
    A: It turns blue.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      Absurd
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      Thanks for the help. Appreciate it!

      Ok, running the exact same code as yours, I get different results...

      main.cpp:

      #include <QApplication>
      #include "Widget.h"
      
      
      
      int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
          QApplication app(argc, argv);
      
          Widget widget;
          widget.show();
      
          return app.exec();
      }
      

      Widget.h:

      #ifndef WIDGET_H_
      #define WIDGET_H_
      
      #include <QWidget>
      
      class Widget : public QWidget {
          Q_OBJECT
      
      public:
          Widget(QWidget* parent = 0);
      };
      
      #endif
      

      Widget.cpp:

      #include "Widget.h"
      #include <QGridLayout>
      #include <QLineEdit>
      #include <QSpacerItem>
      
      Widget::Widget(QWidget *parent)
          : QWidget(parent)
      {
          QGridLayout *gLay = new QGridLayout(this);
          gLay->setSpacing(0);
          gLay->setMargin(0);
      
          for(int i(0); i < 4; i++){
              for(int j(0); j < 32; j++) {
                  if( j == 0 || j == 31){
                      gLay->addItem(new QSpacerItem(0,0,QSizePolicy::Expanding, QSizePolicy::Minimum),i,j);
                  } else {
                      QLineEdit *le = new QLineEdit(this);
                      le->setMaxLength(1);
                      le->setFixedWidth(16);
                      le->setAlignment(Qt::AlignCenter);
                      le->setText("0");
                      gLay->addWidget(le,i,j,1,1, Qt::AlignCenter);
                  }
              }
          }
      }
      

      And then:

      $> qmake-qt4 -project
      $> qmake-qt4 testing.pro
      $> make
      $> ./testing
      

      and the result:
      0_1545131067077_61efcb2e-9c97-48ec-8d01-eaaaa3fac713-image.png


      Maybe I am using different qt version?
      Maybe it's an environment issue?
      What else could it be?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        Absurd
        wrote on last edited by Absurd
        #21

        Important update
        I tried to compile & run the same code on another machine, and guess what...

        0_1545142446417_9270b473-9f2b-43a9-b213-846dae79abd5-image.png

        $> uname -a
        Linux 4.15.0-42-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 15 19:32:57 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
        

        Does anyone has an idea on why would different machine render the GUI differently?

        mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Absurd

          Important update
          I tried to compile & run the same code on another machine, and guess what...

          0_1545142446417_9270b473-9f2b-43a9-b213-846dae79abd5-image.png

          $> uname -a
          Linux 4.15.0-42-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 15 19:32:57 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
          

          Does anyone has an idea on why would different machine render the GUI differently?

          mrjjM Offline
          mrjjM Offline
          mrjj
          Lifetime Qt Champion
          wrote on last edited by mrjj
          #22

          @Absurd
          Are the both linuxes ? ( with GNOME)

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mrjjM mrjj

            @Absurd
            Are the both linuxes ? ( with GNOME)

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Absurd
            wrote on last edited by Absurd
            #23

            @mrjj
            Yes, they are both Linux-based, but not both are GNOME:

            The bad:

            $> uname -a 
            Linux 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Oct 29 17:29:29 EDT 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
            $> ls /usr/bin/*session
            /usr/bin/gnome-session*  /usr/bin/gnome-session-custom-session*
            $> qmake-qt4 --version
            QMake version 2.01a
            Using Qt version 4.8.5 in /usr/lib64
            

            The good:

            $> uname -a
            Linux 4.15.0-42-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 15 19:32:57 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
            $> ls /usr/bin/*session
            /usr/bin/byobu-select-session*  /usr/bin/dbus-run-session*
            $> qmake-qt4 --version
            QMake version 2.01a
            Using Qt version 4.8.7 in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
            
            mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Absurd

              @mrjj
              Yes, they are both Linux-based, but not both are GNOME:

              The bad:

              $> uname -a 
              Linux 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Oct 29 17:29:29 EDT 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
              $> ls /usr/bin/*session
              /usr/bin/gnome-session*  /usr/bin/gnome-session-custom-session*
              $> qmake-qt4 --version
              QMake version 2.01a
              Using Qt version 4.8.5 in /usr/lib64
              

              The good:

              $> uname -a
              Linux 4.15.0-42-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 15 19:32:57 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
              $> ls /usr/bin/*session
              /usr/bin/byobu-select-session*  /usr/bin/dbus-run-session*
              $> qmake-qt4 --version
              QMake version 2.01a
              Using Qt version 4.8.7 in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
              
              mrjjM Offline
              mrjjM Offline
              mrjj
              Lifetime Qt Champion
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              @Absurd
              Hi
              Could yo try to do

              #include <QDebug>
              #include <QStyle>
              
              int main(int argc, char *argv[])
              {
                  QApplication a(argc, argv);
                  qDebug() << QApplication::style()->objectName();
              ...normal code...
              

              and see if they list different styles ?

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                Absurd
                wrote on last edited by Absurd
                #25

                Adding the code you suggested;
                The Bad prints out "oxygen",
                The Good prints out "windows".

                What does that mean?

                Thanks.

                mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Absurd

                  Adding the code you suggested;
                  The Bad prints out "oxygen",
                  The Good prints out "windows".

                  What does that mean?

                  Thanks.

                  mrjjM Offline
                  mrjjM Offline
                  mrjj
                  Lifetime Qt Champion
                  wrote on last edited by mrjj
                  #26

                  @Absurd
                  It means that it uses different QStyles for the look and apparently
                  the oxygen draws the LineEdit with little border or something like that.

                  on the good, could you try

                   QStyle *style = QStyleFactory::create("oxygen");
                      if(style)
                      {
                          qDebug("Oxygen loaded!");        
                          QApplication::setStyle(style);
                      }
                  

                  and see if it then get a space like the bad one ?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Absurd
                    wrote on last edited by Absurd
                    #27

                    You nailed it!
                    I added this code on the 'Good', but QStyleFactory::create("oxygen"); returned NULL for some reason (do you happen to know how can I inspect why? is there something like 'errno' I can print out?), so instead I tried this on the 'Bad':

                    QStyle *style = QStyleFactory::create("windows");
                       if(style)
                       {
                           qDebug("windows loaded!");        
                           QApplication::setStyle(style);
                       }
                    

                    and voilĂ :
                    0_1545145924547_6f35a3ef-60b0-4f07-b136-60657b3ef691-image.png

                    Now, I guess I can use it as a WA, but I'm curious:
                    How is the QStyle determined inside a QApplication?
                    Could it be related to the qt4 versions? (in the 'Bad' machine I didn't have to install qt4 - it was there when I got it, but on the 'Good' I had to install it with sudo apt install qt4-default)

                    Thanks again!

                    mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Absurd

                      You nailed it!
                      I added this code on the 'Good', but QStyleFactory::create("oxygen"); returned NULL for some reason (do you happen to know how can I inspect why? is there something like 'errno' I can print out?), so instead I tried this on the 'Bad':

                      QStyle *style = QStyleFactory::create("windows");
                         if(style)
                         {
                             qDebug("windows loaded!");        
                             QApplication::setStyle(style);
                         }
                      

                      and voilĂ :
                      0_1545145924547_6f35a3ef-60b0-4f07-b136-60657b3ef691-image.png

                      Now, I guess I can use it as a WA, but I'm curious:
                      How is the QStyle determined inside a QApplication?
                      Could it be related to the qt4 versions? (in the 'Bad' machine I didn't have to install qt4 - it was there when I got it, but on the 'Good' I had to install it with sudo apt install qt4-default)

                      Thanks again!

                      mrjjM Offline
                      mrjjM Offline
                      mrjj
                      Lifetime Qt Champion
                      wrote on last edited by mrjj
                      #28

                      @Absurd said in Minimizing Vertical Spacing in QGridLayout:
                      Hi
                      As far as i know QStyleFactory cannot tell you why. only list available styles.

                      • How is the QStyle determined inside a QApplication?
                        Never saw the actual for that detection. so cant tell. sorry.

                      Im wondering if 4.8.5 had a small bug where even disable the border would not
                      reduce the space used. And that was fixed in 4.8.7. Or it simply is a QStyle drawing difference.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Absurd
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        I will try installing 4.8.7 and will update if the behavior is different there...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1

                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups
                        • Search
                        • Get Qt Extensions
                        • Unsolved