Unsolved XmlListModel query returns wrong result?
-
This post is deleted! -
Each
<it>
container can contain a different number of<si>
elements.I don't understand: your
<it>
is not a container for<si>
elements, it's a container for a<c>
element which contains<si>
elements.EDIT
Maybe this is "terminology". I meant direct container, that's what it means to me. But I note now that your query is:
/rm/bt/it[4]/c/si
so you do have thec
level in there.OK, let's be clear: your
<it>
s can only contain just one<c>
? -
@JonB
Hi Jon,
Thanks for your kind reply. I deleted my post before yours was visible.@JonB said in XmlListModel query returns wrong result?:
your <it>s can only contain just one <c>
Yes, well at least at that level.
The reason I deleted my post is that I eventually got things sorted out, although I still don't really get why it didn't work.
I realize that at first, I had <c> elements declared also within <si> sub-elements but given the structure of my query, I didn't think this should be a problem. The <c> elements represented a "code" element, some of which could consist of a sequence of "subcodes", which I again wrap inside a <c> container.
<it> <b>b_info</b> <c> <si><d>d_info1</d><c>s_info1</c></si> <si><d>d_info2</d><c>s_info2</c></si> <si><d>d_info3</d><c>s_info3</c></si> </c> <i>i_info</i> </it>
In any case, I modified the structure of my <it> element to the following in case of a composite code:
<it> <b>b_info</b> <s> <si><d>d_info1</d><c>s_info1</c></si> <si><d>d_info2</d><c>s_info2</c></si> <si><d>d_info3</d><c>s_info3</c></si> </s> <i>i_info</i> </it>
and for a simple code to:
<it> <b>b_info</b> <c> simple_code</c> <i>i_info</i> </it>
Using the above approach in addition makes it simpler to check if it is a composite code or not (/s and /c queries will be null/not null)...
Thanks again!