XmlListModel query returns wrong result?

Diracsbracket

This post is deleted!

JonB

Each <it> container can contain a different number of <si> elements.

I don't understand: your <it> is not a container for <si> elements, it's a container for a <c> element which contains <si> elements.

EDIT
Maybe this is "terminology". I meant direct container, that's what it means to me. But I note now that your query is:
/rm/bt/it[4]/c/si
so you do have the c level in there.

OK, let's be clear: your <it>s can only contain just one <c>?

Diracsbracket

@JonB
Hi Jon,
Thanks for your kind reply. I deleted my post before yours was visible.

@JonB said in XmlListModel query returns wrong result?:

your <it>s can only contain just one <c>

Yes, well at least at that level.

The reason I deleted my post is that I eventually got things sorted out, although I still don't really get why it didn't work.

I realize that at first, I had <c> elements declared also within <si> sub-elements but given the structure of my query, I didn't think this should be a problem. The <c> elements represented a "code" element, some of which could consist of a sequence of "subcodes", which I again wrap inside a <c> container.

        <it>
            <b>b_info</b>
	    <c>
                <si><d>d_info1</d><c>s_info1</c></si>
                <si><d>d_info2</d><c>s_info2</c></si>
                <si><d>d_info3</d><c>s_info3</c></si>
            </c>
            <i>i_info</i>
        </it>

In any case, I modified the structure of my <it> element to the following in case of a composite code:

        <it>
            <b>b_info</b>
	    <s>
                <si><d>d_info1</d><c>s_info1</c></si>
                <si><d>d_info2</d><c>s_info2</c></si>
                <si><d>d_info3</d><c>s_info3</c></si>
            </s>
            <i>i_info</i>
        </it>

and for a simple code to:

        <it>
            <b>b_info</b>
	    <c> simple_code</c>
            <i>i_info</i>
        </it>

Using the above approach in addition makes it simpler to check if it is a composite code or not (/s and /c queries will be null/not null)...

Thanks again!