Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. setModelData crashes program
Qt 6.11 is out! See what's new in the release blog

setModelData crashes program

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved General and Desktop
29 Posts 8 Posters 14.6k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SGaistS Offline
    SGaistS Offline
    SGaist
    Lifetime Qt Champion
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    That's not specific to Q_ASSERT, it's the same for the standard C++ assert. Always test the result of a function and not the function itself.

    Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
    Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • VRoninV Offline
      VRoninV Offline
      VRonin
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      If you want to use it in code that should still be present in release mode you can use Q_ASSUME

      "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
      ~Napoleon Bonaparte

      On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

      JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • VRoninV VRonin

        If you want to use it in code that should still be present in release mode you can use Q_ASSUME

        JonBJ Offline
        JonBJ Offline
        JonB
        wrote on last edited by JonB
        #21

        @VRonin said in setModelData crashes program:

        If you want to use it in code that should still be present in release mode you can use Q_ASSUME

        Um, I don't think so are you sure: http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtglobal.html#Q_ASSUME states it's a compile-time hint, and you get "undefined behaviour" if the condition is false. We need a runtime check of the return result of qobject_cast<>.

        EDIT: Unless the docs are misleading, and the true implementation is via https://git.merproject.org/faenil/qtbase/commit/3b0ed624351441a2d7be45cf9582fd36955ae860 , which uses Q_ASSERT_X?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • VRoninV Offline
          VRoninV Offline
          VRonin
          wrote on last edited by VRonin
          #22

          Q_ASSUME in debug mode is like Q_ASSERT in release mode, if whatComboEditor is null the program would crash anyway so you can't do much worse.

          The undefined behaviour comes from when you use the return value: if(Q_ASSUME(false)) is undefined behaviour. if it just wraps an operation you do not check anyway, Q_ASSUME does nothing to your compiled binary in release mode

          "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
          ~Napoleon Bonaparte

          On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

          JonBJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • VRoninV VRonin

            Q_ASSUME in debug mode is like Q_ASSERT in release mode, if whatComboEditor is null the program would crash anyway so you can't do much worse.

            The undefined behaviour comes from when you use the return value: if(Q_ASSUME(false)) is undefined behaviour. if it just wraps an operation you do not check anyway, Q_ASSUME does nothing to your compiled binary in release mode

            JonBJ Offline
            JonBJ Offline
            JonB
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            @VRonin
            That wasn't quite the point, though. I was talking about writing the single-line statement (if Qt won't offer a qboject_assert_cast<>):

            Q_ASSERT(whatComboEditor = qobject_cast<>)

            versus

            Q_ASSUME(whatComboEditor = qobject_cast<>)

            The point being that it does the assignment. So we do need the expression to evaluate, just we don't need/care to do the "assertion" part of testing the result in release build. This would not work for Q_ASSERT as (I believe) it's a macro which produces nothing (no code at all) in release build. That was when you suggested Q_ASSUME.

            VRoninV 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • JonBJ JonB

              @VRonin
              That wasn't quite the point, though. I was talking about writing the single-line statement (if Qt won't offer a qboject_assert_cast<>):

              Q_ASSERT(whatComboEditor = qobject_cast<>)

              versus

              Q_ASSUME(whatComboEditor = qobject_cast<>)

              The point being that it does the assignment. So we do need the expression to evaluate, just we don't need/care to do the "assertion" part of testing the result in release build. This would not work for Q_ASSERT as (I believe) it's a macro which produces nothing (no code at all) in release build. That was when you suggested Q_ASSUME.

              VRoninV Offline
              VRoninV Offline
              VRonin
              wrote on last edited by
              #24
              • Q_ASSERT(statement);
                • Debug: if(!statement) triggerAnAssertion();
                • Release: ;
              • Q_ASSUME(statement);
                • Debug: if(!statement) triggerAnAssertion();
                • Release: statement;

              Is the difference clearer now?

              "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
              ~Napoleon Bonaparte

              On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

              G JonBJ 2 Replies Last reply
              1
              • VRoninV VRonin
                • Q_ASSERT(statement);
                  • Debug: if(!statement) triggerAnAssertion();
                  • Release: ;
                • Q_ASSUME(statement);
                  • Debug: if(!statement) triggerAnAssertion();
                  • Release: statement;

                Is the difference clearer now?

                G Offline
                G Offline
                gabor53
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                @VRonin
                I added

                 Q_ASSERT(whatComboEditor);
                

                but it behaves the same.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • VRoninV VRonin

                  @gabor53 said in setModelData crashes program:

                  What can I add to prevent the data from disappearing?

                  Sounds like a model bug. What is fixModel?

                  VRoninV Offline
                  VRoninV Offline
                  VRonin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  @VRonin said in setModelData crashes program:

                  Sounds like a model bug. What is fixModel?

                  "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
                  ~Napoleon Bonaparte

                  On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

                  G 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • VRoninV VRonin

                    @VRonin said in setModelData crashes program:

                    Sounds like a model bug. What is fixModel?

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    gabor53
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    @VRonin

                    QSqlTableModel* fixModel = new QSqlTableModel(this);
                      fixModel->setTable ("Items");
                      fixModel->setEditStrategy (QSqlTableModel::OnRowChange);
                      fixModel->setSort (2, Qt::DescendingOrder);
                    
                      fixModel->select ();
                    
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • VRoninV VRonin
                      • Q_ASSERT(statement);
                        • Debug: if(!statement) triggerAnAssertion();
                        • Release: ;
                      • Q_ASSUME(statement);
                        • Debug: if(!statement) triggerAnAssertion();
                        • Release: statement;

                      Is the difference clearer now?

                      JonBJ Offline
                      JonBJ Offline
                      JonB
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      @VRonin

                      Is the difference clearer now?

                      Yep! :) Tx.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • VRoninV VRonin

                        @VRonin said in setModelData crashes program:

                        Sounds like a model bug. What is fixModel?

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        gabor53
                        wrote on last edited by gabor53
                        #29

                        @VRonin
                        Any way to go around the problem?
                        Would it be possible to just redraw the row in which the field was changed?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups
                        • Search
                        • Get Qt Extensions
                        • Unsolved