suggestions for graphing/plotting

VRonin

Before we can get into details, could you tell us your license needs?

Are you ok with GPL (i.e. no commercial use and no closed source)
Are you ok with paying for a license to use the product commercially/closed source?
Do you require week copyleft/permissive licenses (LGPL,MIT,Apache,Mozzilla)?

mzimmers

jsulm: thanks for pointing me to charts. I'd already glanced at it, and it didn't look quite right, but I'll look at it again.

VRonin: for now I'm going to assume that we'll be OK with buying a commercial license, but since I'm still in the proof of concept stage, I'll be going GPL for now. So, either works, really.

SGaist

@VRonin GPL doesn't forbid commercial use (see here) however it doesn't really make sense to create a commercial application using GPL licensed API..

mzimmers

I'm really not concerned about licensing from a cost standpoint. If I can show the powers-that-be that Qt is a superior alternative, they'll have the funds for licensing.

What I'm hoping to get out of this thread is some ideas based on their technical merits. I've briefly looked at Qt Charts and it's probably adequate (overkill, even) for my meager needs. I just need a 2D graph with points, and a few moving line charts. As I said, if I can keep these updated 10X/second, that will be fine.

CroCo

I use QCustomPlot . It is simple and it has very nice features. I use it to plot some results for controlling robotics manipulators. Very good.

mrjj

Hi
I can also highly recommend CustomPlot.
Simply, not expensive, and no complex build requirements.
You be up and running in minutes.

VRonin

@SGaist said in suggestions for graphing/plotting:

@VRonin GPL doesn't forbid commercial use (see here) however it doesn't really make sense to create a commercial application using GPL licensed API..

From https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html

using the Lesser GPL permits use of the library in proprietary programs; using the ordinary GPL for a library makes it available only for free programs.

On the matter at hand, the options are:

Qt Chart and Qt Data Visualization modules (GPL & commercial)
QCustomPlot (GPL & commercial)
KD Chart (GPL & commercial)
Qwt (LGPL)
KPlotting (LGPL)
Any JavaScript charting API (e.g. Google Charts) paired with QWebEngine or QtQuick

SGaist

@VRonin In this context, commercial meant "an application that you sell".

mzimmers

OK, I have a more specific design question. As the image above shows, I'll have 5 items to update (and there will be more). These will probably all update at the same time. Is it considered better to have separate signals for each of these items, or to create a data structure that contains all of their information, and have a "master" signal that passes the entire data structure?

The first alternative is obviously simpler from the standpoint of keeping data current, but uses a lot more signals. The second would reduce the number of signals, but require me to maintain this data structure.

Is there a rule of thumb for knowing when to break updates into multiple signals, and when to combine them?

I suppose a third alternative would be to use the same signal and pass an argument indicating which item(s) are to be updated. This will make the code a little more complex, but would (probably) obviate the issue.

Thanks.

VRonin

Qt Chart and KD Chart (unfortunately I have no other experience with the other tools mentioned so I can't comment on those) can link directly to a QAbstractItemModel to refresh as soon as you update your data in the model.

Qt Chart, at the current development, however, refreshes the entire series every time 1 point changes making it quite slow when handling large volumes (did not test KD Chart under those conditions)