Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Installation and Deployment
  4. [SOLVED] Debian 9 QT Program Compile
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

[SOLVED] Debian 9 QT Program Compile

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Installation and Deployment
18 Posts 4 Posters 8.9k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D djme

    Hi @koahnig,

    Please see below for my Run Settings. It looks like my executable file is set to save to where I expect it to be i.e. /home/dme/build-TEST-Desktop-Release

    The trouble is, there is no executable file in this directory. In QT4 with Debian 8, the executable would always be in the debug or release directory when I completed a build with Qtcreator.

    When Qtcreator lauches the program, where could it be launching it from? It still seems weird to me that I end up with a shared library file. I think Qt is building that instead of an executable even though I chose QT Widgets Application at the start.

    0_1498590177835_Run_Settings.png

    K Offline
    K Offline
    koahnig
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    @dme
    As noted before my description is based on my windows experience.

    The pane basically sais that there is an executable "/home/dme/build-TEST-Desktop-Release/TEST"

    In windows it would have the extension .exe added of course. That should be in my understanding the executable which is actually started in creator. When I could not in past because of AV killed my executable before starting creator exactly the file referenced was gone.

    @djme said in Debian 9 QT Program Compile:

    When Qtcreator lauches the program, where could it be launching it from? It still seems weird to me that I end up with a shared library file. I think Qt is building that instead of an executable even though I chose QT Widgets Application at the start.

    What do you mean here? You see something like dynamic link library?
    That sounds strange.
    Anyway I fear I cannot help you.

    Possibly @SGaist can help.

    Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K koahnig

      @dme
      As noted before my description is based on my windows experience.

      The pane basically sais that there is an executable "/home/dme/build-TEST-Desktop-Release/TEST"

      In windows it would have the extension .exe added of course. That should be in my understanding the executable which is actually started in creator. When I could not in past because of AV killed my executable before starting creator exactly the file referenced was gone.

      @djme said in Debian 9 QT Program Compile:

      When Qtcreator lauches the program, where could it be launching it from? It still seems weird to me that I end up with a shared library file. I think Qt is building that instead of an executable even though I chose QT Widgets Application at the start.

      What do you mean here? You see something like dynamic link library?
      That sounds strange.
      Anyway I fear I cannot help you.

      Possibly @SGaist can help.

      D Offline
      D Offline
      djme
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      @koahnig said in Debian 9 QT Program Compile:

      What do you mean here? You see something like dynamic link library?
      That sounds strange.
      Anyway I fear I cannot help you.

      No worries koahnig. Thanks for trying to help.

      When I click on the TEST file in my release directory, I see the following message:

      0_1498596700253_TEST.png

      If I right click on the TEST file and check the properties, I see the following:

      0_1498596732663_Properties.png

      This might be an issue with the default program that the file manager uses to open such files since I tried to run it through the terminal and it actually launched fine!

      So I think that the application/executable file is being generated, but my Debian system does not seem to recognize it as a stand alone application and does not execute it when I click on it. I'll have to figure out how to configure the Debian 9 file manager to launch the application by itself when I click on it. If I do, I will update this post.

      Thanks for the replies!!

      0_1498596964803_success.png

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • SGaistS Offline
        SGaistS Offline
        SGaist
        Lifetime Qt Champion
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        Go to the command line and run ldd TEST

        Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
        Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • SGaistS SGaist

          Go to the command line and run ldd TEST

          D Offline
          D Offline
          djme
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Hi @SGaist

          Here is the output of "ldd TEST".

          	linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff823b2000)
          	libQt5Widgets.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Widgets.so.5 (0x00007f4342b05000)
          	libQt5Gui.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Gui.so.5 (0x00007f43425cc000)
          	libQt5Core.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5 (0x00007f43420fd000)
          	libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 (0x00007f4341e8b000)
          	libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f4341c6e000)
          	libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f43418ea000)
          	libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f43415e6000)
          	libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f43413cf000)
          	libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f4341030000)
          	libharfbuzz.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libharfbuzz.so.0 (0x00007f4340d9b000)
          	libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007f4340b81000)
          	libpng16.so.16 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng16.so.16 (0x00007f434094c000)
          	libicui18n.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicui18n.so.57 (0x00007f43404d2000)
          	libicuuc.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicuuc.so.57 (0x00007f434012a000)
          	libpcre16.so.3 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre16.so.3 (0x00007f433fec1000)
          	libdouble-conversion.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdouble-conversion.so.1 (0x00007f433fcb0000)
          	libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f433faac000)
          	libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x00007f433f796000)
          	librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f433f58e000)
          	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000561999426000)
          	libexpat.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1 (0x00007f433f364000)
          	libxcb-dri3.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-dri3.so.0 (0x00007f433f161000)
          	libxcb-present.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-present.so.0 (0x00007f433ef5e000)
          	libxcb-sync.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-sync.so.1 (0x00007f433ed57000)
          	libxshmfence.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxshmfence.so.1 (0x00007f433eb53000)
          	libglapi.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglapi.so.0 (0x00007f433e924000)
          	libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXext.so.6 (0x00007f433e712000)
          	libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdamage.so.1 (0x00007f433e50f000)
          	libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXfixes.so.3 (0x00007f433e309000)
          	libX11-xcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11-xcb.so.1 (0x00007f433e107000)
          	libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6 (0x00007f433ddc5000)
          	libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007f433db9d000)
          	libxcb-glx.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-glx.so.0 (0x00007f433d982000)
          	libxcb-dri2.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-dri2.so.0 (0x00007f433d77d000)
          	libXxf86vm.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXxf86vm.so.1 (0x00007f433d577000)
          	libdrm.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdrm.so.2 (0x00007f433d367000)
          	libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so.6 (0x00007f433d0b6000)
          	libgraphite2.so.3 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgraphite2.so.3 (0x00007f433ce89000)
          	libicudata.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libicudata.so.57 (0x00007f433b40c000)
          	libpcre.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3 (0x00007f433b199000)
          	libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXau.so.6 (0x00007f433af95000)
          	libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x00007f433ad8d000)
          	libbsd.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbsd.so.0 (0x00007f433ab77000)
          
          
          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • SGaistS Offline
            SGaistS Offline
            SGaist
            Lifetime Qt Champion
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            And what about file TEST ?

            Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
            Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mark.Roth
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              I was having this same issue after updating to Stretch. It isn't QtCreator doing it but a default setting of GCC6. I would get the so from a simple command line compiled program. To fix this you need to add the switch -no-pie to the gcc settings.
              I did this by making the small change to my .pro file.

              QMAKE_LFLAGS += -no-pie
              

              After that I got the executable I used to get. Hopefully you were having the same issue.

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                djme
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                @Mark.Roth said in Debian 9 QT Program Compile:

                QMAKE_LFLAGS += -no-pie

                Thank you Mark Roth!!!! It is now fixed :)

                Many thanks for your helpful suggestion.

                0_1498673967477_works.png

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • D djme

                  @Mark.Roth said in Debian 9 QT Program Compile:

                  QMAKE_LFLAGS += -no-pie

                  Thank you Mark Roth!!!! It is now fixed :)

                  Many thanks for your helpful suggestion.

                  0_1498673967477_works.png

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mark.Roth
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  @djme I'm glad it worked out. I know it was driving me mad until I figured out why. Just another check mark on the after upgrade list. :)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • SGaistS Offline
                    SGaistS Offline
                    SGaist
                    Lifetime Qt Champion
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    @Mark-Roth Is this something you notified the Qt Project about ?

                    Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                    Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • SGaistS SGaist

                      @Mark-Roth Is this something you notified the Qt Project about ?

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mark.Roth
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      @SGaist I don't see how the Qt Project is responsible. It is to do with GCC6. Debian 8 (Jessie) was using gcc 4.6 I think (strike that 4.9 https://packages.debian.org/jessie/gcc) so it was a huge jump in Stretch. This problem occurs even compiling a simple program (non-qt) from the command line.
                      I did a little digging but can't find out when the -pie (and I suppose the compiler flag pairs) became the default. I supposed it could have been in GCC5. Using Debian does have it's down-sides.
                      https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Link-Options.html#index-no-pie

                      I'll have to see if using one of the compiler side switches creates a binary that can be run normally. Like I said, I only just ran into this when I upgraded to Stretch this past week.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • SGaistS Offline
                        SGaistS Offline
                        SGaist
                        Lifetime Qt Champion
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        I didn't wrote they were responsible. I was just asking you whether you shared that information with them so that they can act accordingly with e.g. documentation update etc.

                        Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                        Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • SGaistS SGaist

                          I didn't wrote they were responsible. I was just asking you whether you shared that information with them so that they can act accordingly with e.g. documentation update etc.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mark.Roth
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          @SGaist Ah, then I should have just said, "No I haven't."

                          What I was getting at is that this may have been around for quite some time. Some of the hits I found while searching were from over 2 years ago. The only people this sort of thing may be new to are those who have been using an old version of GCC. Or perhaps it is Debian specific with the way it associates files. I'm just a hobbiest hack that created an account here to help out the OP.
                          If you think it should be passed along, by all means do so. :)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • SGaistS Offline
                            SGaistS Offline
                            SGaist
                            Lifetime Qt Champion
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            It's very nice of you and highly appreciated :)

                            Thank you !

                            Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                            Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups
                            • Search
                            • Get Qt Extensions
                            • Unsolved