Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Concurrent map equivalent
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Concurrent map equivalent

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved General and Desktop
35 Posts 5 Posters 9.7k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Defohin
    wrote on last edited by Defohin
    #3

    I tried that way, but it crashed:

    QStringList names = { "john", "jane" };
    QString extra = "doe";
    
    auto example = [=] (const QString &name) {
        qDebug() << name << extra;
    };
    
    QtConcurrent::map(names, example);
    

    I thought about using foreach and QtConcurrent::run but I will have to call waitForFinished.

    QStringList names = { "john", "jane" };
    QString extra = "doe";
    
    auto example = [=] (const QString &name, const QString &extra) {
        qDebug() << name << extra;
    };
    
    foreach (QString name, names) {
        QFuture<void> result = QtConcurrent::run(example, name, extra);
        result.waitForFinished();
    }
    

    I don't know if the way I made can lead me to problems, a problem I can see already is: How can I pause them if it's a loop? For instance...

    What you think about that?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mrjjM Offline
      mrjjM Offline
      mrjj
      Lifetime Qt Champion
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Hmm that was odd. does look ok.
      will names survive the scope?

      Well the foreach is not bad but dont
      result.waitForFinished();

      block the GUI thread ?

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mrjjM mrjj

        Hmm that was odd. does look ok.
        will names survive the scope?

        Well the foreach is not bad but dont
        result.waitForFinished();

        block the GUI thread ?

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Defohin
        wrote on last edited by Defohin
        #5

        @mrjj What you mean with names surviving the scope? I don't know what happens, it just crashes.
        The second option seems to be more "the right way" cause I'm passing the values as argument not capturing it in a lambda, also I can create a method and call, the first option I can't call a method.
        I tried this:

        auto example = [=] (const QString &name, const QString &extra) {
            for (int i = 0; i < 9999; ++i) {
                qDebug() << name << extra;
            }
        };
        

        In the second option to see if it blocks the gui thread but I'm able to move it, I don't know if I'm testing the right way.

        edit

        I just realized that it does block the gui thread, I incremented the 9999 to 9999999 and well... nothing shows.

        What can I do?

        kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Defohin

          @mrjj What you mean with names surviving the scope? I don't know what happens, it just crashes.
          The second option seems to be more "the right way" cause I'm passing the values as argument not capturing it in a lambda, also I can create a method and call, the first option I can't call a method.
          I tried this:

          auto example = [=] (const QString &name, const QString &extra) {
              for (int i = 0; i < 9999; ++i) {
                  qDebug() << name << extra;
              }
          };
          

          In the second option to see if it blocks the gui thread but I'm able to move it, I don't know if I'm testing the right way.

          edit

          I just realized that it does block the gui thread, I incremented the 9999 to 9999999 and well... nothing shows.

          What can I do?

          kshegunovK Offline
          kshegunovK Offline
          kshegunov
          Moderators
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @Defohin said in Concurrent map equivalent:

          What you mean with names surviving the scope?

          He means this from the docs for QtConcurrent::map:

          Calls function once for each item in sequence. The function is passed a reference to the item, so that any modifications done to the item will appear in sequence.

          Once you leave the scope of the function, the reference you'd passed is invalid and the program crashes. Perhaps you need mapped() instead?

          Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • mrjjM Offline
            mrjjM Offline
            mrjj
            Lifetime Qt Champion
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Hi
            I think concurrent will be more fun as it dont block the GUI thread.
            as in.

            void mapFunction(int& n) {
            qDebug() << n;
            }
            
            void test() {
              QList<int>* vectorOfInts =  new QList<int>;
              for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
                vectorOfInts->push_back(i);
            
              QFuture<void> future = QtConcurrent::map(*vectorOfInts, mapFunction);
            
            } // end of scope
            
            D 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • kshegunovK kshegunov

              @Defohin said in Concurrent map equivalent:

              What you mean with names surviving the scope?

              He means this from the docs for QtConcurrent::map:

              Calls function once for each item in sequence. The function is passed a reference to the item, so that any modifications done to the item will appear in sequence.

              Once you leave the scope of the function, the reference you'd passed is invalid and the program crashes. Perhaps you need mapped() instead?

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Defohin
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @kshegunov I tried using mapped but it doesn't work with lambdas.

              I removed the waitForFinished and it's working... but I don't know if something bad will happen by doing that...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mrjjM mrjj

                Hi
                I think concurrent will be more fun as it dont block the GUI thread.
                as in.

                void mapFunction(int& n) {
                qDebug() << n;
                }
                
                void test() {
                  QList<int>* vectorOfInts =  new QList<int>;
                  for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
                    vectorOfInts->push_back(i);
                
                  QFuture<void> future = QtConcurrent::map(*vectorOfInts, mapFunction);
                
                } // end of scope
                
                D Offline
                D Offline
                Defohin
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @mrjj Your way works fine but I can't pass additional parameters. The second approach is not blocking anymore cause I removed the waitForFinished but I don't know if it's going to be a bad thing...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Defohin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  I just realized something... if though it's working, if I close the window it will continue running...

                  What can I do?

                  mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Defohin

                    I just realized something... if though it's working, if I close the window it will continue running...

                    What can I do?

                    mrjjM Offline
                    mrjjM Offline
                    mrjj
                    Lifetime Qt Champion
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    @Defohin
                    Hi , i think you can cancel via
                    http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qfuture.html#cancel
                    http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qfuturewatcher.html#cancel

                    I think you need to use QFutureWatcher if u dont use waitForFinished.
                    All credits to @kshegunov :)

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mrjjM mrjj

                      @Defohin
                      Hi , i think you can cancel via
                      http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qfuture.html#cancel
                      http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qfuturewatcher.html#cancel

                      I think you need to use QFutureWatcher if u dont use waitForFinished.
                      All credits to @kshegunov :)

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Defohin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @mrjj

                      Be aware that not all asynchronous computations can be canceled. For example, the QFuture returned by QtConcurrent::run() cannot be canceled; but the QFuture returned by QtConcurrent::mappedReduced() can.

                      :(

                      mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Defohin

                        @mrjj

                        Be aware that not all asynchronous computations can be canceled. For example, the QFuture returned by QtConcurrent::run() cannot be canceled; but the QFuture returned by QtConcurrent::mappedReduced() can.

                        :(

                        mrjjM Offline
                        mrjjM Offline
                        mrjj
                        Lifetime Qt Champion
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        @Defohin
                        Oh. not all can be canceled. :(
                        Well if u need to be able to stop at random then
                        threads might be the best solution.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Defohin
                          wrote on last edited by Defohin
                          #14

                          I don't want the pause, continue or the stop function, I just want to run a list of string over a method and pass additional arguments to it in parallel.
                          Using QtConcurrent::map won't work cause I can't pass additional arguments.
                          Using QtConcurrent::run won't work cause I'll need to call waitForFinished and it will block the GUI thread... (QFutureWatcher::cancel or QFuture::cancel won't work either cause it's not possible to cancel a QFuture returned by QtConcurrent::run)...

                          What can I do? I'm out of ideas.

                          D mrjjM VRoninV 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • D Defohin

                            I don't want the pause, continue or the stop function, I just want to run a list of string over a method and pass additional arguments to it in parallel.
                            Using QtConcurrent::map won't work cause I can't pass additional arguments.
                            Using QtConcurrent::run won't work cause I'll need to call waitForFinished and it will block the GUI thread... (QFutureWatcher::cancel or QFuture::cancel won't work either cause it's not possible to cancel a QFuture returned by QtConcurrent::run)...

                            What can I do? I'm out of ideas.

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            Devopia53
                            wrote on last edited by Devopia53
                            #15

                            @Defohin

                            like this:

                            QStringList names = { "john", "jane" }; // global or member variable
                            
                            void YourClass::startJobs()
                            {
                                QString extra = "doe";
                            
                                auto example = [extra] (QString &name) {
                                    qDebug() << name << extra;
                                };
                            
                                QFuture<void> future = QtConcurrent::map(names, example);
                            }
                            
                            
                            D 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Defohin

                              I don't want the pause, continue or the stop function, I just want to run a list of string over a method and pass additional arguments to it in parallel.
                              Using QtConcurrent::map won't work cause I can't pass additional arguments.
                              Using QtConcurrent::run won't work cause I'll need to call waitForFinished and it will block the GUI thread... (QFutureWatcher::cancel or QFuture::cancel won't work either cause it's not possible to cancel a QFuture returned by QtConcurrent::run)...

                              What can I do? I'm out of ideas.

                              mrjjM Offline
                              mrjjM Offline
                              mrjj
                              Lifetime Qt Champion
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Hi
                              If cancel is a MUST have, then QThreads seems the only option :(

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Devopia53

                                @Defohin

                                like this:

                                QStringList names = { "john", "jane" }; // global or member variable
                                
                                void YourClass::startJobs()
                                {
                                    QString extra = "doe";
                                
                                    auto example = [extra] (QString &name) {
                                        qDebug() << name << extra;
                                    };
                                
                                    QFuture<void> future = QtConcurrent::map(names, example);
                                }
                                
                                
                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                Defohin
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                @Devopia53 It's still crashing for me.
                                @mrjj I don't want to use cancel, as i said, I just want to run in parallel the method for each item of a string list and pass a few additional arguments. No need to cancel.

                                mrjjM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D Defohin

                                  @Devopia53 It's still crashing for me.
                                  @mrjj I don't want to use cancel, as i said, I just want to run in parallel the method for each item of a string list and pass a few additional arguments. No need to cancel.

                                  mrjjM Offline
                                  mrjjM Offline
                                  mrjj
                                  Lifetime Qt Champion
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @Defohin said in Concurrent map equivalent:

                                  No need to cancel.

                                  By cancel i mean to terminate before its finished. Like closing program.
                                  In that regards you need "cancel" :)

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mrjjM mrjj

                                    @Defohin said in Concurrent map equivalent:

                                    No need to cancel.

                                    By cancel i mean to terminate before its finished. Like closing program.
                                    In that regards you need "cancel" :)

                                    D Offline
                                    D Offline
                                    Defohin
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @mrjj Yes, if the application is closed I want to finish the threads as well. I thought it was a default behavior.

                                    Can you give me an example of what I can do? I'm trying to use QRunnable, but I have no idea if it's going to work.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D Defohin

                                      I don't want the pause, continue or the stop function, I just want to run a list of string over a method and pass additional arguments to it in parallel.
                                      Using QtConcurrent::map won't work cause I can't pass additional arguments.
                                      Using QtConcurrent::run won't work cause I'll need to call waitForFinished and it will block the GUI thread... (QFutureWatcher::cancel or QFuture::cancel won't work either cause it's not possible to cancel a QFuture returned by QtConcurrent::run)...

                                      What can I do? I'm out of ideas.

                                      VRoninV Offline
                                      VRoninV Offline
                                      VRonin
                                      wrote on last edited by VRonin
                                      #20

                                      @Defohin said in Concurrent map equivalent:

                                      Using QtConcurrent::map won't work cause I can't pass additional arguments.

                                      Just use a function object

                                      struct MapHelper{
                                      MapHelper(){}
                                      QString m_additionalArgument1;
                                      QString m_additionalArgument2;
                                       typedef QString result_type;
                                          QString operator()(const QString &val)
                                          {
                                              return m_additionalArgument1+val+additionalArgument2;
                                          }
                                      }
                                      
                                      MapHelper helper; // TODO: make sure to manage its lifecycle
                                      helper.m_additionalArgument1 = "Prefix ";
                                      helper.m_additionalArgument2 = " Suffix";
                                      QtConcurrent::map(list_of_names,helper);
                                      

                                      "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
                                      ~Napoleon Bonaparte

                                      On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        Defohin
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @VRonin How to get the return from each one now?

                                        struct NameHelper
                                        {
                                            NameHelper(const QString &extra) : _extra(extra) { }
                                        
                                            typedef QString result_type;
                                        
                                            QString operator()(const QString &name)
                                            {
                                                return QString("Hello %1 %2").arg(name).arg(_extra);
                                            }
                                        
                                            QString _extra;
                                        };
                                        
                                        QStringList names = { "john", "jane" };
                                        QString extra = "doe";
                                        
                                        QFuture<QString> example = QtConcurrent::mapped(names, NameHelper(extra));
                                        

                                        example.result() is returning only "Hello john doe".

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • VRoninV Offline
                                          VRoninV Offline
                                          VRonin
                                          wrote on last edited by VRonin
                                          #22

                                          You can achieve the same with C++11 std::bind:

                                          QString concatenate(const QString& prefix,const QString& val,const QString& suffix){return prefix+val+suffix;}
                                          QtConcurrent::mapped(list_of_names,std::bind(concatenate,"Prefix ",std::placeholders::_1," Suffix"));
                                          

                                          How to get the return from each one now?
                                          [...]
                                          example.result() is returning only "Hello john doe".

                                          use results() instead of result()

                                          "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
                                          ~Napoleon Bonaparte

                                          On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved