Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Qt Creator FC23 New Install - No Console Output
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Qt Creator FC23 New Install - No Console Output

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General and Desktop
22 Posts 5 Posters 9.2k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Ni.SumiN Ni.Sumi

    hi @Shadders ,

    AFAIK, you can't specify the using namespace std in Qt application, which is incompatible with the MockCompiler.

    When it comes to the GUI Based application, Qt sugguest to use QDebug .

    Eg:: #include <QDebug>
    --------------------
    in code.. qDebug() <<"Somehting "; // it will print out like std::cout and powerful than this

    ShaddersS Offline
    ShaddersS Offline
    Shadders
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @Ni.Sumi
    Hi Ni.Sumi,

    Thanks for the guidance, much appreciated.

    I will examine the QDebug aspect - this may be mentioned later in the book.

    Thanks and regards,

    Shadders.

    kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ShaddersS Offline
      ShaddersS Offline
      Shadders
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Hi,

      As an update - the

      using namespace std;
      

      does work - i played about with the code and all that was required was the endl or flush codeword.

      endl places as return as expected, flush outputs the line to console without the return.

      Thanks and regards,

      Shadders.

      jsulmJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ShaddersS Shadders

        Hi,

        As an update - the

        using namespace std;
        

        does work - i played about with the code and all that was required was the endl or flush codeword.

        endl places as return as expected, flush outputs the line to console without the return.

        Thanks and regards,

        Shadders.

        jsulmJ Offline
        jsulmJ Offline
        jsulm
        Lifetime Qt Champion
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        @Shadders I think the std::flush is needed because just after printing the strinig to the standard output you start the Qt event loop (a.exec()). Standard output is buffered, so you do not know exactly when the buffer is really printed. It looks like sometimes starting event loop prevents the buffer from being flushed.

        https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

        1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • ShaddersS Shadders

          @Ni.Sumi
          Hi Ni.Sumi,

          Thanks for the guidance, much appreciated.

          I will examine the QDebug aspect - this may be mentioned later in the book.

          Thanks and regards,

          Shadders.

          kshegunovK Offline
          kshegunovK Offline
          kshegunov
          Moderators
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          @Shadders
          @jsulm is correct. The standard output is a file, and as pretty much any file it is buffered. So you need to explicitly flush the contents sitting in the buffer to see what's been printed. std::endl will do the flush implicitly after adding the newline. This is not a Qt specific thing (to answer your other question), it applies to non-qt applications as well.

          On a related note, if you want a "Qt solution" for writing to the standard output, you can use QTextStream, like this:

          QTextStream cout(stdout);
          cout << "Test string" << endl;
          

          this doesn't require to expand the std namespace, or include <iostream>.

          @Ni-Sumi said:

          AFAIK, you can't specify the using namespace std in Qt application, which is incompatible with the MockCompiler.

          You can. moc doesn't care about the namespaces. The only issue with using namespace std; is the global namespace pollution it introduces, but it's perfectly safe to use it (especially in source files).

          When it comes to the GUI Based application, Qt sugguest to use QDebug .

          Only, and I can't emphasize this enough, for debugging purposes! You shouldn't rely on qDebug for production code.

          Kind regards.

          Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • ShaddersS Offline
            ShaddersS Offline
            Shadders
            wrote on last edited by Shadders
            #15

            Hi jsulm, kshegubnov

            Thanks for the extra feedback, much appreciated.

            I tried the qDebug function and this does not work for my installation of Fedora 23.

            Code i have tried is :

            qDebug("6! is %d   \n", MathFunctions::factorial(6));
            
            qDebug() << "6! is " << MathFunctions::factorial(6);
            
            qDebug() << "6! is " << MathFunctions::factorial(6) << endl;
            

            and

            cout << "6! is " << MathFunctions::factorial(6) << "\n";
            

            The cout version works, but the qDebug version does not print to the console. I replaced the function factorial with a unsigned integer variable, and the same result - no output.

            The qDebug example i have used is from the tutorial book - with the third myself adding the endl.

            The code compiles ok, and i am using v5.6 of QT Creator.

            As such, for the qDebug option, there is no console output.

            I have a bug raised with Fedora bugzilla on the library qtdeclarations-devel and qtquickcontrols2 library/package issue - but i do not think that is the issue here.

            Any ideas on the console output issues i am experiencing ?

            Thanks and regards,

            Shadders.

            kshegunovK ? 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • jsulmJ Offline
              jsulmJ Offline
              jsulm
              Lifetime Qt Champion
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              That's strange. For me it is working on Ubuntu.
              Do you have CONFIG += console in your PRO file?

              https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

              ShaddersS 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • ShaddersS Shadders

                Hi jsulm, kshegubnov

                Thanks for the extra feedback, much appreciated.

                I tried the qDebug function and this does not work for my installation of Fedora 23.

                Code i have tried is :

                qDebug("6! is %d   \n", MathFunctions::factorial(6));
                
                qDebug() << "6! is " << MathFunctions::factorial(6);
                
                qDebug() << "6! is " << MathFunctions::factorial(6) << endl;
                

                and

                cout << "6! is " << MathFunctions::factorial(6) << "\n";
                

                The cout version works, but the qDebug version does not print to the console. I replaced the function factorial with a unsigned integer variable, and the same result - no output.

                The qDebug example i have used is from the tutorial book - with the third myself adding the endl.

                The code compiles ok, and i am using v5.6 of QT Creator.

                As such, for the qDebug option, there is no console output.

                I have a bug raised with Fedora bugzilla on the library qtdeclarations-devel and qtquickcontrols2 library/package issue - but i do not think that is the issue here.

                Any ideas on the console output issues i am experiencing ?

                Thanks and regards,

                Shadders.

                kshegunovK Offline
                kshegunovK Offline
                kshegunov
                Moderators
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                @Shadders
                I also see the qDebug output on Debian. Perhaps it's redirected to the application output window, could you check that?

                PS.
                Sorry for the late reply, I only just received the notification ... very strange.

                Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                ShaddersS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ShaddersS Shadders

                  Hi jsulm, kshegubnov

                  Thanks for the extra feedback, much appreciated.

                  I tried the qDebug function and this does not work for my installation of Fedora 23.

                  Code i have tried is :

                  qDebug("6! is %d   \n", MathFunctions::factorial(6));
                  
                  qDebug() << "6! is " << MathFunctions::factorial(6);
                  
                  qDebug() << "6! is " << MathFunctions::factorial(6) << endl;
                  

                  and

                  cout << "6! is " << MathFunctions::factorial(6) << "\n";
                  

                  The cout version works, but the qDebug version does not print to the console. I replaced the function factorial with a unsigned integer variable, and the same result - no output.

                  The qDebug example i have used is from the tutorial book - with the third myself adding the endl.

                  The code compiles ok, and i am using v5.6 of QT Creator.

                  As such, for the qDebug option, there is no console output.

                  I have a bug raised with Fedora bugzilla on the library qtdeclarations-devel and qtquickcontrols2 library/package issue - but i do not think that is the issue here.

                  Any ideas on the console output issues i am experiencing ?

                  Thanks and regards,

                  Shadders.

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  A Former User
                  wrote on last edited by A Former User
                  #18

                  @Shadders Look at this and blame Fedora: https://forum.qt.io/topic/54820

                  kshegunovK ShaddersS 2 Replies Last reply
                  1
                  • ? A Former User

                    @Shadders Look at this and blame Fedora: https://forum.qt.io/topic/54820

                    kshegunovK Offline
                    kshegunovK Offline
                    kshegunov
                    Moderators
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    @Wieland
                    Smart people those fedora guys ... :D

                    Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jsulmJ jsulm

                      That's strange. For me it is working on Ubuntu.
                      Do you have CONFIG += console in your PRO file?

                      ShaddersS Offline
                      ShaddersS Offline
                      Shadders
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      @jsulm
                      Hi jsulm,

                      Thanks - yes have that directive in the .PRO file. Thanks.

                      Regards,

                      Shadders.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • kshegunovK kshegunov

                        @Shadders
                        I also see the qDebug output on Debian. Perhaps it's redirected to the application output window, could you check that?

                        PS.
                        Sorry for the late reply, I only just received the notification ... very strange.

                        ShaddersS Offline
                        ShaddersS Offline
                        Shadders
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        @kshegunov
                        Hi kshequnov,

                        Thanks - application window has nothing - simple console application.

                        I see that Wieland has provided the answer - essentially debug is set to no for standard installation.

                        Thanks and regards,

                        Shadders.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ? A Former User

                          @Shadders Look at this and blame Fedora: https://forum.qt.io/topic/54820

                          ShaddersS Offline
                          ShaddersS Offline
                          Shadders
                          wrote on last edited by Shadders
                          #22

                          @Wieland
                          Hi Wieland,

                          Thank you for this - much appreciated - changed the ini file to true for debug and is now working.

                          I have a bug report with Fedora for the QtQuick application - seems to be a library dependency in error in their Fedora 23 repository.

                          https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337621

                          Fix seems to be progressing :

                          https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b6db59ce87

                          Only seems to affect QtQuick for the moment.

                          Thanks for the help here, much appreciated.

                          Regards,

                          Shadders.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups
                          • Search
                          • Get Qt Extensions
                          • Unsolved