Need help on Cross compiling Qt 5.1.1 on Imx6
-
HI clogwog,
You make it seems a lot easier. And how I wish it was that easy. Just like you have said "it was a very steep learning curve".
Referring to the cross compiler part, How can I know If I had already Installed it? If not, how can install it? Based on your response I should be installing it on the unit, right? I searched the freescale website using the keyword "cross compiler", then look under "Software development tool", filtered the vendors on "freescale" only. List is showing not a single hint for cross compiler for imx6 or I just don't know what I'm looking for :-(
Thanks in advance for your response.
Regards!
-
ah, i see freescale now points to
it's a free download, i hope it's only the cross compiler, but it might include an IDE as well. i'm downloading it at the moment as well.
i can swear i downloaded the cross compiler directly from freescale. oh well, if this doesn't work i can tar up the cross compiler from my machine.
cross-compiling means compiling it on one architecture for another architecture. so no you wouldn't install it on the unit itself, only on your pc
it is however always an option to try to compile it nativily on the unit using the g++ compiler (is available on your linaro filesystem using apt-get )
-
Just finished downloading the files. Bad internet connection. Sigh :( I download both the bin and tar file, which one should I use. Is a bin file equivalent of an .exe file in windows? About the tar file, I'll just Google on how to extract it. Should I mimic the same directory path you have?
-
i think you can run the binary by just making it executable
chmod +x arm-2013.05-24-arm-none-linux-gnueabi.bin
then you can run it
./arm-2013.05-24-arm-none-linux-gnueabi.binno need to make the same directory path as me, i think mine is in a weird location, but everyone in the department has it there..
just keep an eye out where it installs things. if it doesn't look right just extract the tar file. and place the result somewhere where you'll remember /opt/.. or so
-
Hi,
Finish installing the bin file using the GUI installer. Is it safe to assume I have an cross compiler installed on my host computer? Like as you said, I should check first if it is working. I have a working qt program which is compiled for pc, how to compile it for the imx6 board? and how run it onto the unit? (I mean, do I just copy the compiled file to the unit then run it like an executable file). Sorry, I'm just really new in to this stuff.
-
you can't cross compile a qt program yet, because you don't have the qt libraries cross-compiled yet. that's the whole reason of this.
first try a simple "hello world"
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/C++_Programming/Examples/Hello_world
and instead of using g++ to compile it, use arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g++ that is located in the arm-2013.05/bin/you'll end up with a hello file that you can run on the imx6 board.
you can check on your pc by checking what architecture it was build for by@file hello@
and it should tell you that it is compiled for ARMcopy it onto your imx6 machine and run it
@./hello@if this all works, can you tell me the full path were arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g++ was installed on your machine ?
-
Hi,
Sorry for the late post, I got sick and need to take a couple of days plus the weekend to recuperate. Back to the topic :D
Oh I see, I went a little over board, just a bit exicited :-D I did what you ask me to do. I compiled a simple helloWorld (main.cpp) program and arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g++ and created an exe file(mainarm). I type "file mainarm", here's the description:
mainarm: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, not stripped
I copied it to the extension card of the imx6. I did go the directory of the file where it was copied, tried to run it by typing "./mainarm" but encountered an error "no such file or directory" error. Type "ls" to check if the file exist, unfortunately I can see in the directory :( Did I get it wrong ? Did I miss something? or Do I have to setup something in the board first to make it work? Thank you in advance for your reply :D
And to answer your query(though it's still not working), the full path of arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g++ is '/home/erick/CodeSourcery/Sourcery_CodeBench_Lite_for_ARM_GNU_Linux/bin'
-
output of file looks good !
did you transfer the file using a usb stick ? it might have lost it's executable flag (FAT file-system and linux attributes don't mix very well) .. try
@chmod +x mainarm@
then
@ ./mainarm@
againif that also fails do a :
@ldd mainarm@
and see if all libraries that your executable is linked to can be found (post reply here)
-
Hi,
Already done the two steps you mentioned. The first step didn't work. and on the second step it displayed an error "Not a dynamic executable" (currently looking up at google to know what does mean :-D ).
What should I do next? Thanks
On a side note:
Tried also "file mainarm" and it return an error "no such file or directory" -
whoa..!!
does
@file mainarm@
tell you anything else on the imx6 machine?
what does file on any other existing binary (one that you can run) on your card say ?how about an ldd on an existing binary on your card ? does that work ?
i'm clutching at straws here. anyone else have an idea whats going on here ? -
Hi,
Here are the steps I have done after compiling the main.cpp using the arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g++. I named it "mainarm". And compiled another using the standard g++ compiler, I named it "main"
- From the host ( verified both the file info and shared library dependencies ):
from the command file:
main:
main: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.24, BuildID[sha1]=0xf1b6a3f9a35639d7ff2cce0b8337f51ed9891dc5, not strippedmainarm:
mainarm: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, not strippedfrom the command ldd:
main:
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb777f000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb767e000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0xb74ca000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0xb7486000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7780000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7469000)mainarm:
not a dynamic executable- From the imx6 device:
from the command file:
for both files it displayed an error "command not found"
from the command ldd:
for both files it displayed an error "not a dynamic executable"
-
Hi,
when I type (on the imx6)
-
file /bin/touch it returned :
"command not found" -
ldd /bin/touch it returned:
"librt.so.l => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/librt.so.l (0x2acd9000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so6 (0x2ace7800)
/lob/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 (0x2abld880)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libpthread.so.0 (0x2ab62000)"
-with "which file" nothing happens
Well I think file is not installed on the imx(as you suggested). how could I install it? I tried to connect it with a network cable and open up the chrome browser(which is built in), it can't browse the net. Also tried to ping my computer, it can't see it in the network. But on the system preference it shows a "wired connection"
And what does this mean?
"wouldn’t have thought that a g++ compiled program would do anything on the imx6. it’s the wrong architecture, so that’s not a surprise_" --- does it imply I used the wrong compiler? should I use a different one? what should I use? Sorry, I'm a little bit confuse on whats happening :-( or just referring to other file I compiled with the standard g++ compiler -
-
Hi,
Well I'm just guessing, could it be possible I'm using a different image for imx6 that making me encounter different errors. If it's not too much to ask, could you give me information what image are you using on your board and where to download it? So I can install and run it to my board. Thanks in advance :-D
-
Hi,
Who would have thought my hunch was right. I downloaded a different image for imx6 and installed it to the unit. Seems everything is working as expected.
When typing "file mainarm" it displays :
mainarm: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, ARM, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, not stripped
and on "ldd mainarm" shows:
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libstdc++.so.6 (0x2acc4000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libm.so.6 (0x2abea000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x2ab08000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libc.so.6 (0x2ad6f000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.3 (0x2aae3000)tried the file by typing "./mainarm", the program works!
So what's next? :-D
-
ah good good.
now here comes the time-consuming part:take the sd card out and copy everything (cp -r ) from the card to a directory on your local machine. put it somewhere under a directory called rootfs or so
for example /home/erick/projects/rootfs/this is because the cross compile will be for that particular setup and it needs all the include files and libraries on that card. we will be copying this card a few times as we find out missing libraries (in lib packages) and header files (in lib-dev packages)
go to your qt 5.1.1 source directory and cd into qtbase
then run ./configureand keep in mind that this will take a while to get right
@cd qtbase
./configure -opensource -confirm-license -icu -qt-xcb -make libs -no-pch -opengl es2 -prefix /opt/qt5.1.1-armel -device-option CROSS_COMPILE=/home/erick/CodeSourcery/Sourcery_CodeBench_Lite_for_ARM_GNU_Linux/bin/arm-fsl-linux-gnueabi- -device imx6 -sysroot /home/erick/projects/rootfs/ -no-gcc-sysroot@and i am expecting a lot of errors, so don't worry yet.
-
So I assume this will be the hard part and as you said its time consuming, so I better be get started :-D
Before I proceed, can I make one clarification first. On my system, I think theres two qt programs (I'm assuming they are not the same because one is on a qt5 folder and the other is Qt5.1.1)
I got Qt5.1.1 from http://qt-project.org/downloads using the file "Qt 5.1.1 for Linux 32-bit (417 MB) " to install it(which is a GUI installer and I use default setting for installing) which created a folder on my system ( '/home/erick/Qt5.1.1')
I got qt5 from following this procedure:(https://community.freescale.com/docs/DOC-94066)
QT5
These steps are performed on the host
-
Download the git respository for qt5:
$ git clone git://gitorious.org/qt/qt5.git qt5
$ cd qt5
Let us consider this as <QTDir>
-
Create a build directory to install for the qt5 packages. This directory can be in any loctation. For example,
$ sudo mkdir /opt/qt5
$ sudo chown -R <username> /opt/qt5
Let us consider the the installdir as /opt/qt5
-
Enter the Qt5 directory and run the init-repository script to download all the source code for
Qt5. To download all the source code will take about an hour.$ ./init-repository
Update: In the latest Qt5 release the webkit library is included by default and there are some issues trying to compile it.
use the next line to avoid problems if not desired to use webkit.
$ ./init-repository --no-webkit
===============================================================
which created a folder on my system (/home/erick/qt5).
Now the problem is, you mentioned
"go to your qt 5.1.1 source directory and cd into qtbase
then run ./configure"I can't find "configure" file nor the "qtbase" folder on the Qt5.1.1 folder. But it can be found on the qt5 folder (both the qtbase folder and configure file). Logically, I should pick the qt5 folder because it has the component, and run configure (right?) Would it be a problem in the future (assuming I got the correct configuration), that I have only an installation of qt creator for Qt5.1.1 and not for qt5? Can't find also qtcreator on the qt5 folder :-(
on a side note:
both folders(Qt5.1.1 and qt5) contains the files "qeglfshooks_imx6.cpp, qmake.conf, and qplatformdefs.h" though in different paths.
on the qt5 folder it can be found on '/home/erick/qt5/qtbase/mkspecs/devices/linux-imx6-g++'
on the Qt5.1.1 folder it can be found on '/home/erick/Qt5.1.1/5.1.1/gcc/mkspecs/devices/linux-imx6-g++'
I know this is quite a reading, and I do apologize. I just want you to a have a big and clear picture of what's going on over at my part. I really do appreciate the time and effort your putting out in order to help me. Again, Thank you very very much :-D
-
