Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Qt Creator and other tools
  4. [SOLVED:] Parameters to gcc, like -Wno-comment
Qt 6.11 is out! See what's new in the release blog

[SOLVED:] Parameters to gcc, like -Wno-comment

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Qt Creator and other tools
13 Posts 2 Posters 7.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    I saw in http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.general/36895 that

    @QMAKE_CXXFLAGS += -Wno-comment@

    in the .pro file should work, but there is some finger trouble (more below). Same matter with

    @QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_WARN_OFF@

    which is too wide, I certainly don't want to switch off all warnings.

    The finger trouble is that either it tells me

    @Configuration unchanged, skipping qmake step.@

    even if I try to Save or Build or Rebuild or whatever..)
    or I get

    @mingw32-make: 'debug/S_ChanSched.o' is up to date.@

    even if I do Build. Seems like the tool tries to protect compiled files, perhaps to avoid having to rebuild other dependencies. But I am used to "Build" meaning unconditional build.

    Q1. Are the .pro file examples correct?

    Q2. How do I get change in it to make new makefile, and why isn't that automatic?

    Q3. How do I do a forced build?

    I am having so much finger trouble with this tool, (which up to now doesn't seem like KISS). And I can't say I am a newbie to the art either, having done this for 35 years! Ok, maybe it is that gray hair!-)

    Øyvind
    http://www.teigfam.net/oyvind/home/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • SGaistS Offline
      SGaistS Offline
      SGaist
      Lifetime Qt Champion
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      If the rebuild doesn't do, just delete the shadow build. From time to time it's the only option on Windows...

      Also depending on what you modify (i.e a warning flag) make won't rebuild everything since it's does not modify any actual file. Should there be something that touches every file of the project or mark something as force-rebuild when a flag is modified ? Maybe. That could make the object of a feature request for QtCreator

      Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
      Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Offline
        ? Offline
        A Former User
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        None of these seem to be picked up from the .pro file:

        @QMAKE_CXXFLAGS += -Wno-comment
        QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_WARN_OFF += -Wno-comment@

        so they must be wrong. If I quote them into qmake, they don't appear in the build either. I have some Qt users with me, and have we tried.. Help!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Offline
          ? Offline
          A Former User
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          I wise guy here guessed that since I have plain C project, this this might help:

          @QMAKE_CFLAGS += -Wno-comment@

          It did, since we now got it in the gcc build string:

          @gcc -c -pipe -fno-keep-inline-dllexport -Wno-comment -g -Wall -Wextra -DUNICODE -D_AUTROKEEPER_QT_PLAINC_ -D_COMPILE_WARNINGS_A_ -I..\autrokeeper_Qt_plainC -I"..\autrokeeper" -I"..\avr8" -I"..\scheduler" -I"." -I"C:\Qt\Qt5.1.0\5.1.0\mingw48_32\mkspecs\win32-g++" -o debug\S_ChanSched.o ..\scheduler\S_ChanSched.c@

          But I still got the "multi-line comment" error. Is this because it came before -Wall? If so, how do I move -Wall in front of -Wno-comment? I have experimentet and can't see a command that removes the last -Wall.

          Do I have to specify some rule in some file to get rid of the -Wall, and then introduce one myself in from of the -Wno-comment?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • SGaistS Offline
            SGaistS Offline
            SGaist
            Lifetime Qt Champion
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            You might have to edit the win32-g++ mkspec for that

            Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
            Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Offline
              ? Offline
              A Former User
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Again thanks for not giving me up!
              I digged based on that cue, and the answer seems to go like this:

              Comment out (with a #)

              @QMAKE_CFLAGS_WARN_ON = -Wall -Wextra@

              from the file (Qt installed at standard place on windows):

              @C:\Qt\Qt5.1.0\5.1.0\mingw48_32\mkspecs\win32-g++\qmake.conf@

              and add this in the Qt Creator .pro file:

              @QMAKE_CFLAGS += -Wall -Wextra
              QMAKE_CFLAGS += -Wno-comment@

              This will make -Wno-comment overtake -Wall for that explicit warning. Build now looks like this, with -Wno-comment parsed after -Wall etc. by gcc:

              @gcc -c -pipe -fno-keep-inline-dllexport -Wall -Wextra -Wno-comment -g -DUNICODE -D_AUTROKEEPER_QT_PLAINC_ -D_COMPILE_WARNINGS_A_ -I..\autrokeeper_Qt_plainC -I"..\autrokeeper" -I"..\avr8" -I"..\scheduler" -I"." -I"C:\Qt\Qt5.1.0\5.1.0\mingw48_32\mkspecs\win32-g++" -o debug\S_ChanSched.o ..\scheduler\S_ChanSched.c@

              This seems to work. Please advice if there are any errors in my reasoning above. I will add [SOLVED] after some time if it's all ok.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • SGaistS Offline
                SGaistS Offline
                SGaist
                Lifetime Qt Champion
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                If you want to use these option for several or all your projects, you can modify the mkspec or create your own and use that one

                Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  A Former User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Ok, where do I in case put my own? Will it override the original, or will the original have to be removed?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • SGaistS Offline
                    SGaistS Offline
                    SGaist
                    Lifetime Qt Champion
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    if you create your own, you just need copy/paste the original folder and rename it (plus make the modifications you want). Then you'll need to use the new name in the Kits configuration.

                    Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                    Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      A Former User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      I moved the \win32-g++ directory with the modified qmake.conf to a local directory, inside my project. Then I went through this in Qt Creator (but I am not certain if this is right and what you meant!):

                      @| Projects
                      | Manage Kits
                      | Build & Run
                      | Kits
                      | Manual
                      | Add .. name etc plus most importantly:
                      | Qt mskspec: path to new \win32-g++ directory@

                      I now have two Kits, the default and my new.

                      But do observe, I also had to move the directory "\common" to the same level as the "\win32-g++" directory, as I got a complaint. Does this have any side effect (i.e. is there a tool that would update any file(s) in any of these two directories)?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • SGaistS Offline
                        SGaistS Offline
                        SGaist
                        Lifetime Qt Champion
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        I would just have added the new mkspec in the same directory but with a different name i.e "mywin32-g++"

                        Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                        Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups
                        • Search
                        • Get Qt Extensions
                        • Unsolved