Widgets/C++ camera quality vs QtQuick/Qml camera quality



  • Hello,
    I have a problem: for some strange reason default "camera" example implemented in C++ displays way more qualitative image compared to QtQuick "declarative-camera" example. For example, compare the following two screenshots:
    http://www.gerixsoft.com/tmp/camera.png
    http://www.gerixsoft.com/tmp/declarative-camera.png
    --> same hardware config, same Qt config, etc, yet such a big difference in quality...

    The question is: is there a way to make QtQuick/Qml declarative camera have same quality of video output as Widgets/C++ camera has?

    Thanks,
    Andriy



  • I think not. It seems to not deeply use the same "gstreamer plugins". I'm also not sure of my answer, but it is the impression i have.
    You can maybe try to change some camera parameters from qml code, but not sure you will have the same result (it's look like luminosity problem).



Looks like your connection to Qt Forum was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.