Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Hiding rows in QTableView seems to be slow

Hiding rows in QTableView seems to be slow

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General and Desktop
8 Posts 3 Posters 10.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stoeltze
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi,

    I am using QTableView for handling a table with up to 600,000 rows. Displaying the table and sorting it works well.
    However, in my interactive environment, I need to rapidly hide/show rows depending on the row index. For a smaller
    number of rows (~3000) this works perfectly fast but for 600,000 rows it is terribly slow. As a solution, I tried:
    @
    qtableview->setUpdatesEnabled(false);
    <showRow(...)/hide row(...)>
    qtableview->setUpdatesEnabled(true);
    @
    However, this didn't help.

    Any other idea is deeply appreciated.

    Best Regards,
    Steffen

    Edit: Please use @ tags to highlight code; Andre

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • EddyE Offline
      EddyE Offline
      Eddy
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Have a look at Qsortfilterproxymodel.

      Qt Certified Specialist
      www.edalsolutions.be

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        stoeltze
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thank you very much for the quick reply. I had a look at Qsortfilterproxymodel. I understand now how to use regular expressions to filter rows with respect to the contents of (a) specific field(s). However, I want to filter the rows with respect to their index which is not stored in any field. It just exists implicitly. For example, hide rows 1-5, 10-100, and 500-2000 and show the rest. Could you please provide a hint on how to use Qsortfilterproxymodel for that purpose.

        Thank you very much.
        Steffen

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Offline
          L Offline
          loladiro
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Have a look at "filterAcceptsRow()":http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/qsortfilterproxymodel.html#filterAcceptsRow

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • EddyE Offline
            EddyE Offline
            Eddy
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Your index is just a column in your table ,you should be able to filter on using filteracceptsrow.

            Qt Certified Specialist
            www.edalsolutions.be

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              stoeltze
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Thanks for the helpful suggestions. I guess, I derive my own class from Qsortfilterproxymodel. Then, I overwrite the method filteracceptsrow. In my method, I check whether "int source_row" shall be shown or hidden based on a boolean array (size = number of rows) I already have and I return true or false, respectively. Once the boolean array in my interactive application changes, I have to call invalidateFilter() on my QSortFilterProxyModel. Am I right?

              Steffen

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Offline
                L Offline
                loladiro
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Yes, you are.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  stoeltze
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  The procedure I described above works very well. Thanks a lot to Eddy and loladiro. Just one thing I would like to add is that instead of calling "invalidateFilter()" on the custom QSortFilterProxyModel, one should call "invalidate()" which is considerably faster. I don't know why...

                  Steffen

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  • Login

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups
                  • Search
                  • Get Qt Extensions
                  • Unsolved