Rumor discussion: Nokia and Microsoft to team up on Windows Phone 7
-
Another article have a completely different and more understandable thoughts on Nokia, Android and WP7:
"http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2010/12/some-symbian-sanity-why-nokia-will-not-join-google-android-or-microsoft-phone-7.html":http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2010/12/some-symbian-sanity-why-nokia-will-not-join-google-android-or-microsoft-phone-7.html
I have read the whole article last week and according to this article Nokia always had long term plans, if they switch to either Android or WP7 it will be a short term plan and I don't think Nokia would have put too much effort on planning Symbian^4 and even releasing Symbian^3.
Also the article describes how Nokia wants to keep its customers, if you look at Nokia dumb phones, Nokia E62 and Nokia N8 you can expect same workflow, and Nokia lost 1 of 5 customers because they had a plan to migrate their users from dumb phones to smart phones.
But still they are rumors, I am waiting for the Q1 2011 because they are about to release an update to Symbian^3, Nokia E7 and other news.
-
I think MeeGo will be more a tablet/TV OS rather than a phone OS. Let's see maybe we are wrong on this... but still Nokia is pushing Qt and it has been said that in the future users will see one UI which will be built on top of Qt and they will not care about the underlying OS.
-
[quote author="Milot Shala" date="1292925026"]Nokia is pushing Qt and it has been said that in the future users will see one UI which will be built on top of Qt and they will not care about the underlying OS.[/quote]
Which is a sound strategy, I beleive. Moreover as it can be easily available in almost all other (non-Nokia used) OSs and provides a very sizeable market for developers.
-
[quote author="VCsala" date="1292925387"]
[quote author="Milot Shala" date="1292925026"]Nokia is pushing Qt and it has been said that in the future users will see one UI which will be built on top of Qt and they will not care about the underlying OS.[/quote]Which is a sound strategy, I beleive. Moreover as it can be easily available in almost all other (non-Nokia used) OSs and provides a very sizeable market for developers.[/quote]
You are right, for this reason they are pushing Qt Quick, because WP7 has Silverlight as its main development tool.
But again, according to my last post, I don't see Nokia will abandon Symbian or MeeGo soon and I am hoping to do so :)
-
WP7 on Nokia would be shooting yourself in a foot for Nokia. Besides Android would be better choice (because of market share). There are always rumors like this one when quite big transfers are happening. So everybody should be skeptical about it.
P.S. I'm waiting for MeeGo :D
-
[quote author="maciek" date="1292927927"]WP7 on Nokia would be shooting yourself in a foot for Nokia. Besides Android would be better choice (because of market share). There are always rumors like this one when quite big transfers are happening. So everybody should be skeptical about it.
P.S. I'm waiting for MeeGo :D[/quote]
According to Nokia's open source strategy I think they will go further with Android, but in the other hand Nokia's competitors are doing it with Android too.
I am waiting for MeeGo too :)
-
[quote author="Milot Shala" date="1292924683"]Another article have a completely different and more understandable thoughts on Nokia, Android and WP7:
"http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2010/12/some-symbian-sanity-why-nokia-will-not-join-google-android-or-microsoft-phone-7.html":http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2010/12/some-symbian-sanity-why-nokia-will-not-join-google-android-or-microsoft-phone-7.html[/quote]
That sure is an interesting read. Thanks for linking to it. It does bring some perspective, even if I'm not completely done reading it yet. -
[quote author="Andre" date="1292932385"]
[quote author="Milot Shala" date="1292924683"]Another article have a completely different and more understandable thoughts on Nokia, Android and WP7:"http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2010/12/some-symbian-sanity-why-nokia-will-not-join-google-android-or-microsoft-phone-7.html":http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2010/12/some-symbian-sanity-why-nokia-will-not-join-google-android-or-microsoft-phone-7.html[/quote]
That sure is an interesting read. Thanks for linking to it. It does bring some perspective, even if I'm not completely done reading it yet.[/quote]
I have read it entirely and it is a good perspective. The question was "Who invented the smart phone?" and you can imagine the answer :)
-
Yes, that was a very interesting article (more so for Nokia fans). On the Nokia World it was a clear message that Nokia "as the inventor of the smart phone" do not want to let others to steal their market. So if they think it seriously (and why not) great things should come.
-
[quote author="VCsala" date="1292934883"]Yes, that was a very interesting article (more so for Nokia fans). On the Nokia World it was a clear message that Nokia "as the inventor of the smart phone" do not want to let others to steal their market. So if they think it seriously (and why not) great things should come.[/quote]
And not making any WP7 devices :)
-
[quote author="Milot Shala" date="1292928508"]
According to Nokia's open source strategy I think they will go further with Android, but in the other hand Nokia's competitors are doing it with Android too.
[/quote]Android is right now the less open project of the open source world. Until some weeks ago, we didn't even knew that Gingerbread was 2.3 and not 3.0. That's an anecdote, sure, but what about publishing the source code days before they are shipping the product? What about not knowing a thing about the features of the release?
No, Android is certainly released with an open licences, but it's not developed in the open, and it's very unclear to me how Nokia could release a product with Android with the way Google/OHA works.
If Nokia and Microsoft have had conversations, is more likely that they are collaborating in services (Nokia already collaborates with Yahoo, isn't it?).
-
I'm afraid I have to say that Nokia doesn't seem to be able to create a competitive smartphone OS and even more important an app ecosystem.
For how long are they working on Maemo / Meego? What's the pace they're getting Qt Quick out? That's all way to slow. At least, what has been shown in public. I mean, we're talking about a billion dollar market and I see development progress and release schedules in Meego and Qt that doesn't seem to be very different from open source sparetime projects. Qt Quick and Qt Creator 2.1 should have been finished for at least half a year. It's not that complex that money couldn't help.Look at what RIM did with their playbook OS. Look at Googles Honeycomb for tablet. Look at what's going on at the app stores of Android and Apple.
Being competitive at creating hardware is a different story to being a great software development company.After having that said I would be very happy if Nokia could surprise us all with the greatest Smartphone ever with Meego OS.
-
Knacktus: You seem to forget that Android was bought by Google in 2005, yes that's almost 6 years ago and their first release was in 2008. In other words, it took them 3 years to actually publish the first release and I think that it wasn't usable until the donut release (September 2009).
MeeGo was announced in 2010 and since then they have been busy merging two projects and at the same time Qt:ify it (maemo and moblin was built on gtk). We haven't seen any devices yet (well, the WeTab exits...) but I'm quite sure we will see some this year, maybe Q2-Q3, hopefully already at MWC.
My personal opinion is that Android's success story is more because of people tend to listen to what Google has to say because they are large and have had a number of successful services (but also plenty that aren't that successful). You don't associate Nokia with geeks (yet) but with Google you do.
The same goes for Apple. I think that Apple can actually make people buy a pencil by marketing it as a new way of communicating, "just write your message on a piece of paper..."
I'm not saying that Nokia is the perfect company but with MeeGo they have at least the most open platform out there and they put a lot of effort in making it happen. I'm pretty sure that MeeGo has more developer from Nokia/Intel than Google have on Android.
-
OK, I agree: Android and iOS did not get there over night. They (and others) are rolling already when Nokia still has to get up to speed. That probably gives a distorted view at the progress.
bq.
The same goes for Apple. I think that Apple can actually make people buy a pencil by marketing it as a new way of communicating, “just write your message on a piece of paper…”And then Apple announces: "By the way, from now on everything you've written belongs to us!" And the people are cheering in ecstasy ... ;-)
That's why we need the MeeGo! Damn, I need a phone (mine is 8 years old) and refuse to buy Android or Apple.
-
[quote author="Knacktus" date="1296879822"]OK, I agree: Android and iOS did not get there over night. They (and others) are rolling already when Nokia still has to get up to speed. That probably gives a distorted view at the progress.
bq.
The same goes for Apple. I think that Apple can actually make people buy a pencil by marketing it as a new way of communicating, “just write your message on a piece of paper…”And then Apple announces: "By the way, from now on everything you've written belongs to us!" And the people are cheering in ecstasy ... ;-)
That's why we need the MeeGo! Damn, I need a phone (mine is 8 years old) and refuse to buy Android or Apple.[/quote]
Buy a Nokia N8. I have a Nexus One also but the N8 is my default phone :)
-
One thing that I don't get is, why is people in such a hurry? Nokia is a profitable company as of right now. It has lost market share in high end phones, but there is no need to rush it. I mean, US-centric tech sites (and their readers) are all the time saying that "Nokia is late in the game". WTF? You know who were late in the game too? Apple and Google. They came to the phone market years after Nokia.
They seem like if 2011 is the end of the world, and you know what? Nokia and everyone else will be still selling phones in 2012, 2013, 2014, and so on. You don't need to focus in doing something awesome but for this year only, at the expense on the future. You have to think in the things to come midterm too.
What really worries me, is that Nokia spent a lot of time in Orbit/DUI/MeeGo Touch, creating the Symbian Foundation, closing the Symbian Foundation, etc. Symbian needs a complete UI rewrite, IMHO, and it needs to be Qt based, but the announcement of "Nokia moving solely to Qt":http://conversations.nokia.com/2010/10/21/nokia-focuses-on-qt-to-extend-reach-for-developers-make-mobile-experience-richer-for-users/ came as late as October 2010. The rumor is that PR2.0 for Symbian^3 (well, now just Symbian) will be soon be released, and will do that overhaul of the UI. Let's see if the MWC and February bring some shiny stuff. In the meantime, I don't think that Symbian is total crap, as some try to make everybody think. My C7 kicks ass to my HTC Desire in many aspects.