Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. QPainter performance regression in Qt 5.0.1 compared to 4.8.4

QPainter performance regression in Qt 5.0.1 compared to 4.8.4

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General and Desktop
2 Posts 2 Posters 2.9k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kamre
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Used this [url=http://byte.kde.org/~zrusin/examples/qgears2.tar.bz2]simple benchmark[/url]. Both Qt versions were build with MinGW GCC 4.7.2 Comparing average fps for FANCYGEARS.

    On my laptop (Lenovo X200s with integrated video card):
    @5.0.1 44 fps
    4.8.4 68 fps
    @

    On my desktop (Core i5-2400, NVIDIA GTX 560 Ti):
    @5.0.1 158 fps
    4.8.4 218 fps
    @

    Am I doing something wrong or "Amazing graphic capabilities and performance" means regression for my desktop use cases?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sierdzioS Offline
      sierdzioS Offline
      sierdzio
      Moderators
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I remember other benchmark a while back telling that Qt5.0.0's raster was about 25% faster. I don't have time to check your code now, but will try to take a look later. Please consider filling a bug report or at least pinging the development ML.

      (Z(:^

      1 Reply Last reply
      0

      • Login

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Users
      • Groups
      • Search
      • Get Qt Extensions
      • Unsolved