Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. QML and Qt Quick
  4. Qml/Js/Vm vs. Upgraded C++ GUI API with Bindings
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Qml/Js/Vm vs. Upgraded C++ GUI API with Bindings

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved QML and Qt Quick
4 Posts 3 Posters 2.4k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    d3fault
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    the other poll brought the irrelevant Desktop Components into the mix. they don't factor in because they are obviously the next logical step along the path that has already been created: QtQuick -> JS/VM -> QML -> Desktop Components. Desktop Components stole the last poll.
    tried to be as un-biased as possible (even though that's an impossible task)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      lgeyer
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      There is already another "poll":http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/16465/ (including an extensive discussion) on this topic. I don't think there is any reason to go through this exhausting subject again.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Offline
        D Offline
        d3fault
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        [quote author="Lukas Geyer" date="1336733332"]There is already another "poll":http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/16465/ (including an extensive discussion) on this topic. I don't think there is any reason to go through this exhausting subject again.[/quote]

        That one's biased, and the newer one is skewed.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          troubalex
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          While I understand your motivation and goals, I don't think these polls get you anywhere closer to where you want to go. The only serious option I can identify is to persuade developers and maintainers via the mailing-list. As far as I can see, you are already working on this.

          I don't see how this poll makes a big difference to the last one, you can't keep polling until you get the result you want to see. Even if you managed to post an unbiased poll, which is an art in itself.

          And don't get me wrong, I don't even have a stake in how Qt is developed: I'm not using it. :P

          Conclusion: I'm closing this thread since it won't add anything and duplicates other efforts.

          THE CAKE IS A LIE
          Web Community Manager - Qt Development Frameworks

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups
          • Search
          • Get Qt Extensions
          • Unsolved