Which one is better between `xcb` and `eglfs` on raspberry qt native built installation
-
I need to install and use Qt for my gui medical device (dental glazer furnace) part into my raspberry zero like this:
SO I have tried cross compilation qt first which I have some problem which doesn't solve, could be seen here:
https://forum.qt.io/post/534298
and
https://forum.qt.io/post/534028
so I prefer to build native installation Qt v 5.12.3 into my pi zero and now I have some problem like these:
https://forum.qt.io/post/535271
now based on my question answers, I need to choose between
xcb
andeglfs
plugin, SO I searched via internet and found these:https://forum.qt.io/topic/23738/egl-eglfs-xcb-and-opengl-es-in-qt
and
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21488072/what-is-the-use-of-various-qt-platform-plugins
but I don't find out what is better for my qt GUI design as you can see I need something like these:
andSo what do you think I better between
xcb
andeglfs
plugin for my usage to be chosen?this question link via raspberrypi.org :
https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=242854
Thanks.
-
@SoheilSabz
if the sole purpose of the device is to act as a medical device with a UI go with EGLFS (and QML) and avoid the X11 overhead.