Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Regarding Locking The File
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Regarding Locking The File

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General and Desktop
39 Posts 10 Posters 17.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cincirin
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    You don't have to exchange data between more processes. Just use "aquire":http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/qsystemsemaphore.html#acquire to lock some memory block and "release":http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/qsystemsemaphore.html#release to unlock that memory block.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      koahnig
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      [quote author="cincirin" date="1308821592"]You don't have to exchange data between more processes. Just use "aquire":http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/qsystemsemaphore.html#acquire to lock some memory block and "release":http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/qsystemsemaphore.html#release to unlock that memory block. [/quote]

      What's the help?
      The idea is to share a file somewhere. Two applications are acessing the file, but since the applications are not hosted on the same machine, they do not share memory.

      Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Offline
        C Offline
        cincirin
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        bq. What's the help?
        The idea is to share a file somewhere. Two applications are acessing the file, but since the applications are not hosted on the same machine, they do not share memory. [/quote]

        Sorry, I did not see: "2 Apps running on 2 different machines"
        In first post @Indrajeet not mention this situation.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          Indrajeet
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          Hi All

          So wat is the way to solve it can anyone suggest me.

          Regards
          Indrajeet

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Offline
            C Offline
            cincirin
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            What about "setPermissions":http://doc.qt.nokia.com/latest/qfile.html#setPermissions ? You can set QFile::ReadOwner | QFile::WriteOwner permission when you have access and QFile::ReadOther | QFile::WriteOther when you finish to read / write.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I Offline
              I Offline
              Indrajeet
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              Hi cincirin

              Here owner is the one who opens the file first.

              Regards
              Indrajeet

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                dangelog
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Wait a minute, how are the two applications (running on two different machines) supposed to write to the very same file? Are you using some network file system (SMB, NFS)?

                Software Engineer
                KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  koahnig
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  peppe makes certainly a good point here.
                  @Indrareet, I guess you need to tell a little more about your applications.

                  Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Offline
                    I Offline
                    Indrajeet
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    Hi All

                    I have created a DLL in QT which contains two functions.
                    1.)Read File
                    2.)Write File

                    This DLL is used by more than 1 application on same PC.Read & Write will be performed on same file kept at some shared location.
                    So the problem Iam facing is all applications are trying to write file at same time.
                    So is there any way by which we can give access to only one at a time to write to the file.
                    so once he complete writing the other can write

                    Give Sample Code.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Z Offline
                      Z Offline
                      ZapB
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      The fact that the function is in a dll is irrelevant. Are the applications that are in contention running on the same machine or separate machines? You hav said both so far.

                      If they are ont he same machine you can use QSystemSemaphore or a lock file type mechanism.

                      If they are on separate machines and the shared file is on some kidn of network drive then you will most likely be best using a lock file.

                      Nokia Certified Qt Specialist
                      Interested in hearing about Qt related work

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • G Offline
                        G Offline
                        goetz
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        You are changing stories.

                        Yesterday you wrote (emphasis by me):

                        [quote author="Indrajeet" date="1308819271"]Hi
                        I dont want to exchange the data between 2 processes.
                        2 Apps running on 2 different machines access same file located at some location.
                        [/quote]

                        Some 20 hours later it is (emphasis by me):

                        [quote author="Indrajeet" date="1308898293"]
                        This DLL is used by more than 1 application on same PC. Read & Write will be performed on same file kept at some shared location.
                        [/quote]

                        Which one is the right one?

                        http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • I Offline
                          I Offline
                          Indrajeet
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          Hi Zap

                          Can you please show how to lock the file while writing.

                          Regards
                          Indrajeet

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • I Offline
                            I Offline
                            Indrajeet
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            Hi Volker

                            Both are there but you can answer for second option.i.e
                            This DLL is used by more than 1 application on same PC. Read & Write will be performed on same file kept at some shared location.

                            Regards
                            Indrajeet

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Z Offline
                              Z Offline
                              ZapB
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              No. You have not answered the question. We cannot advise you in detail until you give us a definitive description of the problem first.

                              We have already told you two alternative approaches depending on your situation.

                              Nokia Certified Qt Specialist
                              Interested in hearing about Qt related work

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Z Offline
                                Z Offline
                                ZapB
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #24

                                Sorry our last replies must have crossed in mid-air. If both apps are on the same machine then use QSystemSemaphore. What is not clear about that?

                                Nokia Certified Qt Specialist
                                Interested in hearing about Qt related work

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • I Offline
                                  I Offline
                                  Indrajeet
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #25

                                  Hi Zap

                                  Can you please show me how to use QSystemSemaphore
                                  to avoid multiple processes to write in single file at same time.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    andre
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #26

                                    A QSystemSemaphore can protect a resource. A resource can almost anything: a block of memory, access to a piece of hardware, or access to a file. In your case, you allow only one access to your file at the same time. So, you create a semaphore with an appropriate key (perhaps "com.your.domain.your.app/yourFile" or something unique like that), and use an initial value of 1. Then, when you want to start accessing your file, you call the acquire() method on the semaphore, and check the return value. If the return value is true, then you have successfully acquired the resource (access to the file), and can proceed to modify the file. If you get a false, then something else is already accessing the file and you can not modify it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • K Offline
                                      K Offline
                                      KA51O
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #27

                                      I had a similar problem. My application is watching a directory using QFileSystemWatcher. If a new file is stored in the directory i want to read that file. The file is written to the directory by another application which is in no way connected to my app. The problem I encountered was that sometimes the FileSystemWatcher notices a new file and I start reading it with QFile.readAll() before it is acctually completely written, thus getting an empty or incomplete String. My dirty solution was checking if the file was modified within the last 2 seconds and if not start reading. This works in my case since the file is only once written and afterwards will only be accessed or modified by my application. But in the case mentioned by the OP this wont work.

                                      @Andre: Will QSystemSemaphore be an adequate solution for my problem as well ?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        andre
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #28

                                        [quote author="KA51O" date="1309335683"]@Andre: Will QSystemSemaphore be an adequate solution for my problem as well ?[/quote]
                                        No, it will not.
                                        The use of QSystemSemaphore assumes that the process all use that same semaphore to get access to the resource. If they don't (and your case, you can be sure of that), then the semaphore is useless.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K Offline
                                          K Offline
                                          KA51O
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #29

                                          Too bad. Thanks for the reply anyways.
                                          Is there maybe another way to deal with my problem in a more "professional" way? I cannot use any OS specific methods like 'fuser' or 'lsof'.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved