Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Qt Creator and other tools
  4. [Original problem solved] Using different tool chains in creator
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

[Original problem solved] Using different tool chains in creator

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Qt Creator and other tools
15 Posts 3 Posters 4.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    koahnig
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    well, if you have to do this for let's 4 to 5 libs and the application, you may end up with a mess/mix if you are not careful.

    Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Offline
      T Offline
      tobias.hunger
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Oh, your application consists of several distinct parts?

      Why don't you write a pro-file to bind them all together? The subdirs template works fine for that:-)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Offline
        K Offline
        koahnig
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        ok?
        First, yes, the application has several distinct parts. Respectively, I have a couple of applications sharing the same libs. The pressing problem is at the time for one application only. But certainly, it is good to a more general solution.
        Can you give me a hint on specific doc with an example?

        Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Offline
          K Offline
          koahnig
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          [quote author="koahnig" date="1306826849"]
          Can you give me a hint on specific doc with an example? [/quote]
          I should have googled first. :-) I am coming back if I struggle with what I have found. Thanks anyway.

          Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Offline
            L Offline
            luca
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            [quote author="Tobias Hunger" date="1306785408"]Hmmm... Ctrl-T, Tab, arrow up/down, to switch the build configuration, ESC to close the dialog and Ctrl-B to trigger the build. Seems acceptable to me:-)[/quote]
            Very good... from now it will be my building procedure too. :-D

            koahnig,
            if I undertood what you need you should do this in your .pro:
            @
            ...
            ...
            linux-g++ {
            #queste 4 righe seguenti servono per qextserialport:
            INCLUDEPATH += ../qextserialport_x86
            QMAKE_LIBDIR += ../qextserialport_x86/build
            LIBS += -lqextserialport
            DEFINES = TTY_POSIX
            }

            linux-arm-gnueabi-g++ {
            #queste 4 righe seguenti servono per qextserialport:
            INCLUDEPATH += ../qextserialport_beagle
            QMAKE_LIBDIR += ../qextserialport_beagle/build
            LIBS += -lqextserialport
            DEFINES = TTY_POSIX
            }
            @

            I use this to compile for my linux pc and to cross-compile for my beagleboard using qextserialport library.

            Remember that before this you need to compile the library for both platform and put it in different directories .

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Offline
              K Offline
              koahnig
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Luca, thanks for info.

              I will try it. With a little trial and error I ended with something like:

              @
              ...
              ...
              Host: INCLUDEPATH += ../qextserialport_x86
              Arm: INCLUDEPATH += ../qextserialport_beagle
              Host: QMAKE_LIBDIR += ../qextserialport_x86/build
              Arm: QMAKE_LIBDIR += ../qextserialport_beagle/build
              Host: LIBS += -lqextserialport
              Arm: LIBS += -lqextserialport
              DEFINES = TTY_POSIX
              @
              which could be rewritten as:
              @
              ...
              ...
              Host {
              INCLUDEPATH += ../qextserialport_x86
              QMAKE_LIBDIR += ../qextserialport_x86/build
              LIBS += -lqextserialport
              }
              Arm {
              INCLUDEPATH += ../qextserialport_beagle
              QMAKE_LIBDIR += ../qextserialport_beagle/build
              LIBS += -lqextserialport
              }
              DEFINES = TTY_POSIX
              @

              Arm or Host is set through the parameter list with "CONFIG+=Arm" for instance. I knew that it is a little wooden, but it worked and elegance was not my major target.

              Now following your example, I may simplify also other steps, but I am not clear how to know the parameter "linux-arm-gnueabi-g++" or the slightly different version I probably need.
              Is it one of the commands in *.conf?
              Or is it the directory name where the conf is stored?

              BTW I have generated a Qt version for cross compilation and that part is working. I have copied and adjusted for compiler path names a directory in "mkspecs/qws".

              Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Offline
                L Offline
                luca
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                [quote author="koahnig" date="1306839404"] I am not clear how to know the parameter "linux-arm-gnueabi-g++" or the slightly different version I probably need.

                [/quote]

                To know it you must enter your Qt source (mine is in /opt/qt4-4.7.1 and /opt/qt4-4.7.1-beagle) and type:
                @
                ls -l /opt/qt4-4.7.1/mkspecs/default
                @
                it's a symbolic link. I get this:
                @
                lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Dec 16 21:03 /opt/qt4-4.7.1/mkspecs/default -> linux-g++
                @
                so I must use linux-g++ when compiling for my linux PC.

                While for my beagleboard (arm) :
                @
                ls -l /opt/qt4-4.7.1-beagle/mkspecs/default
                @
                I get:
                @
                /opt/qt4-4.7.1-beagle/mkspecs/default -> qws/linux-arm-gnueabi-g++/
                @

                So I must use "linux-arm-gnueabi-g++" .

                That's all .

                Let me know...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  koahnig
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Yes, this does work.
                  The names you are determining through the symbolic link are the same as used for the -spec parameter used by creator for qmake.

                  Currently, I am struggling with the CONFIG parameter. I assumed that it contains either "debug" or "release". In creator you have the choices between "Debug", "Release" and "Debug and release".

                  I have added following statement to the .pro file:
                  @
                  message ("CONFIG = " $$CONFIG)
                  @

                  For debug the output is:
                  @
                  Project MESSAGE: CONFIG = lex yacc warn_on debug uic resources qt warn_on release incremental link_prl def_files_disabled no_mocdepend release stl qt_no_framework debug Arm staticlib
                  @

                  For release the output is:
                  @
                  Project MESSAGE: CONFIG = lex yacc warn_on debug uic resources qt warn_on release incremental link_prl def_files_disabled no_mocdepend release stl qt_no_framework Arm staticlib
                  @

                  For "Debug and release" the output is:
                  @
                  Project MESSAGE: CONFIG = lex yacc warn_on debug uic resources debug DebugBuild Debug build_pass qt warn_on release incremental link_prl def_files_disabled no_mocdepend release stl qt_no_framework debug_and_release Arm debug DebugBuild Debug build_pass staticlib
                  @

                  in qmake doc for "CONFIG":http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7/qmake-variable-reference.html#config
                  you can read that "relase" is ignored when "debug" is present. But the release and debug settings are containing both.

                  Am I compiling the whole time in debug mode even when switched to release?

                  I understand where the last (two/three) parameters in each CONFIG are coming from, but not the majority in the beginning.

                  Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    luca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    I can't help you but a fast check to a debug or release building consist in checking executable file size.
                    Debug building generate a bigger file...

                    I think someone in the DevNet can help you better... :-)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Offline
                      K Offline
                      koahnig
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      @Luca
                      Thanks for your input. It is appreciated.

                      Let us see, if someone is able to open the Gordean knot with CONFIG :-)

                      Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K Offline
                        K Offline
                        koahnig
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        The original problem is solved through the subdirs template of qmake.

                        Here is the example of my case
                        @
                        TEMPLATE = subdirs
                        CONFIG += ordered
                        SUBDIRS =
                        ALib
                        BLib
                        CLib
                        DLib
                        Applications/Appl1
                        @

                        Each directory needs a .pro-file with the same name as the directory name is.

                        Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups
                        • Search
                        • Get Qt Extensions
                        • Unsolved