Memory leaks in 6.9.1 that weren't there in 6.9.0
-
@Perdrix said in Memory leaks in 6.9.1 that weren't there in 6.9.0:
And still no mimimal, compilable example to reproduce the problem...
-
@Perdrix
But if you want the devs to actually look at it you need to supply some complete, minimal program which shows that. Devs expect to copy, paste, compile, run, see behaviour, investigate. If you say it is so easy to reproduce that should not be hard. Otherwise I would not rely on them looking into it. -
I thought it was trivial to reproduce - but my initial stab at a test case shows I was wrong - I am working on a test case that does show the problem.
-
P Perdrix has marked this topic as solved
-
The problem is - the initial report and the testcase do not match and 90% of the vld report don't even have a Qt dll anywhere in the backtrace so it's hard to see where Qt should be involved here.
As I wrote in my first post - install the Qt debug symbols so we can at least see where exactly in the Qt source the leak should be as it's not reproducible/is different with your test application
