Qt vs QT annoyance

andre

Indeed. On second thought: no thanks. I'd like to stay in control on what I write. Auto replacing is probably not a good idea.

? This user is from outside of this forum

-1 to auto replacement ...
I would rather have tip or info for the day on QtDN somewhere and keep showing this and many more msgs in a loop ... what say?

ucomesdag

Come on guys, why should QThread become Qthread, regular expressions anyone?

Just a simple warning before posting when you write QT all over the place and the why you shouldn't and if you want it to be corrected. Only newbies will get bothered, as we all already know how to write Qt ;-)

At least it will save you from each time, over and over, correcting people that insist writing QT.

dangelog

<optimism mode="on">
Display a short list of FAQs for the first 10 posts or so immediately next to the "Post a reply" / "Post a new thread" form; between them, "it's Qt, not QT!"? :P
</optimism>

giesbert

a short hint before post is ok, I think, auto replacement would also be ok, if it's smart enough.

deimos

+2 , me and my cat ( Cutee ) want that ;)

mgran

Thanks guys (and cat!), as has been pointed out I think auto replacement is out of scope. A little notice - either fixed, or on "QT" detection - would go a long way. Let's do that.

Added it to backlog!

ucomesdag

[quote author="Marco Bavagnoli" date="1299711167"]+2 , me and my cat ( Cutee ) want that ;)[/quote]
I already like your cat :)

leon.anavi

+1 sounds nice :)

deimos

bq. I already like your cat :)

here hungry Cutee :)
!http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/7841/cutee.jpg(Cutee)!

eheh

stukdev

Good idea, a lot of people write QT :)

Smar

I’ve few times thought that I should post some kind of (un)funny poster about QT and Qt... I wonder there’s such.

troubalex

[quote author="Smar" date="1300792563"]I’ve few times thought that I should post some kind of (un)funny poster about QT and Qt... I wonder there’s such.[/quote]

Let me know when you find one. I could use it too...