Qt vs QT annoyance
-
If the replacement is smart, that's ok ... But we don't want to have QThread translated to Qthread :-)
-
-1 to auto replacement ...
I would rather have tip or info for the day on QtDN somewhere and keep showing this and many more msgs in a loop ... what say? -
Come on guys, why should QThread become Qthread, regular expressions anyone?
Just a simple warning before posting when you write QT all over the place and the why you shouldn't and if you want it to be corrected. Only newbies will get bothered, as we all already know how to write Qt ;-)
At least it will save you from each time, over and over, correcting people that insist writing QT.
-
Thanks guys (and cat!), as has been pointed out I think auto replacement is out of scope. A little notice - either fixed, or on "QT" detection - would go a long way. Let's do that.
Added it to backlog!
-
[quote author="Marco Bavagnoli" date="1299711167"]+2 , me and my cat ( Cutee ) want that ;)[/quote]
I already like your cat :) -
+1 sounds nice :)
-
bq. I already like your cat :)
here hungry Cutee :)
!http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/7841/cutee.jpg(Cutee)!eheh
-
I’ve few times thought that I should post some kind of (un)funny poster about QT and Qt... I wonder there’s such.
-
[quote author="Smar" date="1300792563"]I’ve few times thought that I should post some kind of (un)funny poster about QT and Qt... I wonder there’s such.[/quote]
Let me know when you find one. I could use it too...