how about little consistency ?
-
-
This post is deleted!
Dear @AnneRanch,
can you help us underdstand what is the problem here?
Cheers
Axel -
Dear @AnneRanch,
can you help us underdstand what is the problem here?
Cheers
Axel@Axel-Spoerl how about
#include "Bt-uTiLity_LIBrarY_gloBAl.h ?
-
@Axel-Spoerl how about
#include "Bt-uTiLity_LIBrarY_gloBAl.h ?
@AnneRanch said in how about little consistency ?:
@Axel-Spoerl how about
#include "Bt-uTiLity_LIBrarY_gloBAl.h ?
It is really entirely up to you how you name your headers.
-
@Axel-Spoerl how about
#include "Bt-uTiLity_LIBrarY_gloBAl.h ?
File name conventions should be consistent. The examples, including your last proposal show little consistency being applied by the user. That's confusing.
Answering the title question "How about little consistency?": Not a good idea. Full consistency is much better than little consistency, or even no consistency.
If you are interested to learn about our coding style, this might help you.
