Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Spell checker for Qt application Editor
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Spell checker for Qt application Editor

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General and Desktop
23 Posts 7 Posters 13.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    Immii
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Thanx Qtk, I am able to checkout now. Hope this serve my Need.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Offline
      G Offline
      goetz
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      The sources on gitorious seem to be a Qt libs project, that means it's the regular Qt libs enhanced with some built-in spell checkers. Unfortunately I doubt it is usable for mort than some tests at the moment.

      http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        goetz
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        I've added the spell checker example on the wiki page "Spell Checking with Hunspell ":http://developer.qt.nokia.com/wiki/Spell_Checking_with_Hunspell. It's not the most beautiful code in the world, but it works for me :-) Hopefully it's useful for someone else.

        http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          Jupiter
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          @Volker
          is it allowed in an commercial app (like you also use) to embed the hunspell libs into the application as a static lib?

          afaik lgpl says, it has to be replace able?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Offline
            G Offline
            goetz
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            It just works the same with using dynamic/shared libs (DLLs).

            http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              Jupiter
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              well actually when i change it to @LIBS += -L<myLibPath> -lhunspell@ it doesn't link also tried -llibhunspell -lhunspell-1.3 almost every combination. but it does not link. any ideas about that?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G Offline
                G Offline
                goetz
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                What files do you have in your lib path?

                http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jupiter
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  on mac i have libhunspell-1.3.0.dylib
                  a libhinspell-1.3.a
                  and a symlink libhunspell-1.3.dylib

                  if i link against the .a (static link) it works. but it doesn't work when i link against the .dylib

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Offline
                    G Offline
                    goetz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Just to make sure: you did leave out the filename (hunspell-xxx.dylib) from the argument to -L (uppercase L), as this must point to a directory, not a file?

                    http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jupiter
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      yes and a lowercase l before the lib name right? exactly like i wrote 2 posts before is my call

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups
                      • Search
                      • Get Qt Extensions
                      • Unsolved