Qt 4.8 QSlider handle size

[hskoglund]

Ok that could explain the different behavior, I never tested on Gentoo, sorry :-(

[SPlatten]

@hskoglund , I thought I would take another look and I was wrong, looking at Qt Build & Run the compilers are:

Auto-detected
    g++ (gnat-2014-4-x86)
    gcc (x86 64bit in /usr/bin)
    gcc (x86 32bit in /usr/bin)

I then cleaned and rebuilt and can see in the Compiler Output it is using g++. I then opened a terminal and typed: g++ --version:

g++ (Gentoo 4.6.3 p1.13, pie-0.5.2) 4.6.3

So it looks like it is the same version after all.

[hskoglund]

Hi I googled that Gentoo release and it seems that there's no online installation of Qt 4.8.4 available for it, so I think your version of Qt 4.8.4 is custom built, i.e. built by downloading the source for Qt 4.8.4 and compiling. And in that process some features might have been dropped, for example z-order for widgets.
So I simplified my example to not to rely on a working z-order, please try this version:

#include <QApplication>
#include <qslider.h>

class Window : public QWidget
{
    Q_OBJECT

// setup 2 real sliders and 2 "followers" that are stacked under the real ones
    QSlider* pSlider1;
    QSlider* pSlider1Follower;
    QSlider* pSlider2;
    QSlider* pSlider2Follower;

public:
    Window()
    {
        setGeometry(130,130,860,660);

        pSlider1Follower = new QSlider(Qt::Horizontal,this);
        pSlider1Follower->setTickPosition(QSlider::TicksBothSides);
        pSlider1Follower->setTickInterval(2);

        pSlider2Follower = new QSlider(Qt::Vertical,this);
        pSlider2Follower->setTickPosition(QSlider::TicksBothSides);
        pSlider2Follower->setTickInterval(2);

        pSlider1 = new QSlider(Qt::Horizontal,this);
        pSlider2 = new QSlider(Qt::Vertical,this);

        connect(pSlider1,SIGNAL(valueChanged(int)),this,SLOT(valueChanged1(int)));
        connect(pSlider2,SIGNAL(valueChanged(int)),this,SLOT(valueChanged2(int)));

    // do an initial update/refresh
        valueChanged1(0);
        valueChanged2(0);
    }

public slots:
    void valueChanged1(int value)
    {
        pSlider1Follower->setValue(value);

        pSlider2->setStyleSheet(QString("QSlider::groove { background: transparent; width: %1px; } "
       "QSlider::handle { background: #eeeeee; border:1px solid grey; height: %2px;}").arg(value + 30).arg(value * 2 + 10));

        pSlider2->setGeometry(660,30,2 * value + 30,600);
        pSlider2Follower->setGeometry(660,30,2 * value + 30,600);
    }

    void valueChanged2(int value)
    {
        pSlider2Follower->setValue(value);

        pSlider1->setStyleSheet(QString("QSlider::groove { background: transparent; height: %1px; } "
       "QSlider::handle { background: #eeeeee; border:1px solid grey; width: %2px;}").arg(value + 30).arg(value * 2 + 10));

        pSlider1->setGeometry(30,300,600,2 * value + 30);
        pSlider1Follower->setGeometry(30,300,600,2 * value + 30);
    }
};

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    QApplication app(argc, argv);
    Window window;
    window.show();
    return app.exec();
}

#include "main.moc"

If it bulds ok, lets' debug:

1. How many sliders do you see?
2. If you move one of them, does it cause any other slider to move as well?
3. If you move one of them, does it cause any other slider to change in size?

[SPlatten]

@hskoglund , I’ll try this tomorrow and get back to you.

[SPlatten]

@hskoglund

1. 2 Sliders, 1 horizontal and 1 vertical, with two handles on each, the horizontal slider handles do not look correct.

2 . Moving the vertical slider causes both vertical handles to move together, the coloured square handle is correct orientation, this also increases height of horizontal slider.

Moving the horizontal slider increases the width of the vertical slider, but the handles are not together, one is the correct orientation but centered.

3. Vertical handles are in sync. Horizontal are not.

[hskoglund]

Hi, is it possible for you to post a screenshot, for example when all the sliders are at about 50%?

[SPlatten]

@hskoglund , unfortunately not, the development system is so locked down, I cannot get anything off the system, which is why when I post there are often errors in syntax because I have to retype it.

[hskoglund]

If you have a mobile phone with a camera, is it possible you could take a picture of the screen using your mobile phone?

[SPlatten]

@hskoglund , I can't paste the photo into this forum, it just gives the file URL.

[hskoglund]

Sometimes it's tricky to post a picture into this forum from a mobile phone :-(
If you have email installed on your phone, you could try emailing the picture to yourself, then open that picture on a computer and post it from there...

[SPlatten]

@hskoglund I have the photo and emailed it to myself, but I cannot access my email (personal) from these computers...it will have to wait until I get home later tonight.

[SPlatten]

@hskoglund , please see screenshot taken with phone:

cid:3BAF623A-7AF5-4E01-BE6B-D9971912745D

[hskoglund]

Hi, as you say, the vertical slider looks ok but not the horizontal one. Sure you copied my program ok? If you check with wc it should say:

70  166 2117 main.cpp

and the md5 sum:

md5sum main.cpp
1eaf936e1072bf34bbb817a942295ada  main.cpp

could you take a photo of the code after public slots: it should look like this:

Sorry to bother but over the years, many times I've been struck by that "not copied verbatim" bug...

[SPlatten]

@hskoglund , I work remotely 300 miles away from where I live, I'm home now and will be back at the system on Monday, I'll take a look and get back to you on Monday.

[SPlatten]

@hskoglund, I've been through the source again an yes there was an error in the CSS, which having corrected this what I'm seeing is still four handles, where the underlying handles are orientated incorrectly, the handles on-top of these are orientated as I would expected.

Moving the vertical slider increases the width of the horizontal slider.
Moving the horizontal slider increases the height of the vertical slider.

[hskoglund]

Hi, if you're seeing four handles now, if I look at your screenshot above, I see only three handles.
Could you take a picture of the code now after you've corrected it?

[SPlatten]

Its only 3 because the vertical handles are tracking and it was resized to obscure the one under it. Now the CSS is fixed both sets of handles move together.

I can't really do the screen shot until Thursday so I'm hoping it isn't required?

[hskoglund]

Aha nice! So if they move together (both horizontally and vertically) that means your screen now looks similar to my screenshot 5 days ago?
Which means you can use this as a solution for displaying classical grooves and simultaneously having resizable QSlider handles on your Qt 4.8.4...

[SPlatten]

@hskoglund , I'm just a little confused as to why you chose to show four sliders when only two are required?

[hskoglund]

I tried lots of variations with just one QSlider, but couldn’t find a way to both have a resizable handle and proper grooves.
So by introducing one extra ”dummy” QSlider hidden underneath, was a way out of this dilemma.