Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Behind the Scenes
  3. Qt.io webservices
  4. [Suggestion] Provide URLs to diffs of wiki pages
Qt 6.11 is out! See what's new in the release blog

[Suggestion] Provide URLs to diffs of wiki pages

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Qt.io webservices
17 Posts 3 Posters 6.1k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? This user is from outside of this forum
    ? This user is from outside of this forum
    Guest
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    link to what? you can already open that particular version ... can you elaborate further

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Offline
      D Offline
      DenisKormalev
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      chetankjain, you can open it, but you can't provide to anyone link to diff between two versions. All you can for now is just saying something like "look diff between this time and that time".

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W Offline
        W Offline
        Wolf P.
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        [quote author="chetankjain" date="1291573779"]link to what? you can already open that particular version ... can you elaborate further[/quote] Yes, I know. But it would make life a bit easier to say look at this diff instead of look on the edit to this revision wouldn't it?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? This user is from outside of this forum
          ? This user is from outside of this forum
          Guest
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          checked in wikipedia, yes they provide such a link ...
          but how often would this be used?
          maybe a lower priority request to the devnet team? marius?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • W Offline
            W Offline
            Wolf P.
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            [quote author="chetankjain" date="1291574229"]checked in wikipedia, yes they provide such a link ...
            but how often would this be used? [/quote] In wikipedia: heavily.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Offline
              D Offline
              DenisKormalev
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Wolf P., wikipedia is big and mature project :) I think that it will be used at DevNet, but not so often.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W Offline
                W Offline
                Wolf P.
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                The MediaWiki software has also the contributions of this user list. With its help you can check for spam, vandalism, etc.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Offline
                  D Offline
                  DenisKormalev
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Wolf P., you can look for wiki pages touched by user in his profile.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • W Offline
                    W Offline
                    Wolf P.
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Denis, I didn't introduce wp here, but yes I know - and use - the function in MediaWiki-based wikis. And: Yes, I saw the list of wiki pages touched in DevNet.

                    BTW: I'm in doubt if a contributions list is really a good thing for privacy reasons.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ? This user is from outside of this forum
                      ? This user is from outside of this forum
                      Guest
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      why would privacy be invaded? since this is a purely technical wiki? can you elaborate

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • W Offline
                        W Offline
                        Wolf P.
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        For Wikipedia: analysing the contributions you can create profiles of the users interests.

                        For purely technical wikis: A timestamped list of contributions lets you track the user's activities, estimate when they spend how much time in the DevNet etc. I think that this could become problematic sometimes.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Offline
                          D Offline
                          DenisKormalev
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Wolf P., don't see any problems if someone will now when I spent time at DevNet. It also can be viewed by my comments at DevNet forum.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ? This user is from outside of this forum
                            ? This user is from outside of this forum
                            Guest
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            [quote author="Wolf P." date="1291576543"]
                            For purely technical wikis: A timestamped list of contributions lets you track the user's activities, estimate when they spend how much time in the DevNet etc. I think that this could become problematic sometimes.[/quote]

                            i still don't see any problem ... are you concerned with something like: some manager does not want you to log into devnet site during work hours? but that sort of thing is now totally outdated.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • W Offline
                              W Offline
                              Wolf P.
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Denis, maybe no problem for you ;)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • W Offline
                                W Offline
                                Wolf P.
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                [quote author="chetankjain" date="1291576891"] but that sort of thing is now totally outdated. [/quote] hehe

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • X Offline
                                  X Offline
                                  xsacha
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Are you afraid your boss is tracking you Wolf P? Maybe seeing how much code you give away for free rather than for the company? I don't think anonymity is a need.

                                  As long as there is a link to the diff page, you can just tell someone which diff time to create.

                                  • Sacha
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups
                                  • Search
                                  • Get Qt Extensions
                                  • Unsolved