Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Behind the Scenes
  3. Qt.io webservices
  4. What is going with this spam detection here?
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

What is going with this spam detection here?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Qt.io webservices
spam
21 Posts 7 Posters 8.4k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mrjjM Offline
    mrjjM Offline
    mrjj
    Lifetime Qt Champion
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    yeah its not mega show stopper
    but kinda surprising when it happens.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • SGaistS Offline
      SGaistS Offline
      SGaist
      Lifetime Qt Champion
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Hi,

      Do you have small example that reproduces this ?

      Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
      Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mrjjM Offline
        mrjjM Offline
        mrjj
        Lifetime Qt Champion
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        i forgot what it was. Been a while since last time.
        @kshegunov help at one point, maybe he can remember
        as he found what part of code that triggered the spam checker.
        ( I asked him on chat)

        kshegunovK 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mrjjM mrjj

          i forgot what it was. Been a while since last time.
          @kshegunov help at one point, maybe he can remember
          as he found what part of code that triggered the spam checker.
          ( I asked him on chat)

          kshegunovK Offline
          kshegunovK Offline
          kshegunov
          Moderators
          wrote on last edited by kshegunov
          #9

          @mrjj
          It was Wieland's code and this triggered the spam filter (editing is not checked, so that's a workaround):

          #include <QDebug>
          #include <QQuickItem>
          #include <QQmlContext>
          

          Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • SGaistS Offline
            SGaistS Offline
            SGaist
            Lifetime Qt Champion
            wrote on last edited by SGaist
            #10

            So writing includes ?

            #include <QDebug>
            #include <QObject>
            #include <QWidger>
            

            Makes it trigger ?
            [edit: Fixed code after testing SGaist]

            Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
            Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • SGaistS Offline
              SGaistS Offline
              SGaist
              Lifetime Qt Champion
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Ok after a quick test, the includes themselves are innocent. It's the < > signs that triggers the detection. I think they might detected as html tags. A simple fix for that is to tell markdown that you are writing C++. Simply add c++ after the three ` when you write a code block and you're good to go.

              Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
              Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

              kshegunovK J 2 Replies Last reply
              1
              • SGaistS SGaist

                Ok after a quick test, the includes themselves are innocent. It's the < > signs that triggers the detection. I think they might detected as html tags. A simple fix for that is to tell markdown that you are writing C++. Simply add c++ after the three ` when you write a code block and you're good to go.

                kshegunovK Offline
                kshegunovK Offline
                kshegunov
                Moderators
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                @SGaist

                It's the < > signs that triggers the detection. I think they might detected as html tags.

                Not all headers trigger the anti-spam plugin. In my investigation from the 10-15 includes only this block appeared to be troublesome. If I had to guess, the combination of <, > and the words debug or object are the prime culprit.

                Kind regards.

                Read and abide by the Qt Code of Conduct

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • SGaistS SGaist

                  Ok after a quick test, the includes themselves are innocent. It's the < > signs that triggers the detection. I think they might detected as html tags. A simple fix for that is to tell markdown that you are writing C++. Simply add c++ after the three ` when you write a code block and you're good to go.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jakob
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  @SGaist Hm, I tried that - didn't help

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • SGaistS SGaist

                    Hi,

                    Do you have small example that reproduces this ?

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jakob
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    @SGaist It is the exact code snippet that is now in the ubuntu paste bin, for which I posted the link.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jakob

                      I'm trying to ask a question about a crash I'm seeing with a very small code snippet, but somehow the question is blocked, without any explanation as to why.

                      Why? Why?

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jakob
                      wrote on last edited by Jakob
                      #15

                      I adjusted the title a bit, now that I'm not so frustrated anymore. But in conclusion:

                      Number 1: I think it is a very good idea to have some protection on a forum like this.

                      However: introducing such a thing, without letting any user of the forum know, apparently without even some of the moderators(!!!!) knowing exactly about the details, to me, is a very, very bad idea. To the user it feels they are not taken seriously, and the maintainers of the forum just do whatever they like. That is a very, very uncomforting feeling to get from a forum in the 'Qt-world', where usually a high standard of professionalism is the standard.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mrjjM Offline
                        mrjjM Offline
                        mrjj
                        Lifetime Qt Champion
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        Hi
                        well considering I have posted around 2000 posts and been
                        hit 2 times, its not overly aggressive if u ask me :)

                        Also its VERY normal not to tell/make public available how to cheat a filter as it
                        then stops working very fast.

                        Also, it has been here all along. At least since I started. My first "SPAM" was
                        like in my first week.

                        But I agree. I would be nice to know WHY it triggers on pretty normal code.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • JKSHJ Offline
                          JKSHJ Offline
                          JKSH
                          Moderators
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          Pinging @tekojo -- the false positives with code snippets are still happening :(

                          Qt Doc Search for browsers: forum.qt.io/topic/35616/web-browser-extension-for-improved-doc-searches

                          tekojoT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • JKSHJ JKSH

                            Pinging @tekojo -- the false positives with code snippets are still happening :(

                            tekojoT Offline
                            tekojoT Offline
                            tekojo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            @JKSH
                            Hmm, I thought it was fixed.
                            Should be ok now.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tekojoT Offline
                              tekojoT Offline
                              tekojo
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              As for why it hits code snippets... I'm not completely sure. My feeling is that it mistakes them for some sort of scripting attack.

                              To be honest the main type of spam we have had, has mostly been chinese false educational spam and weird korean stuff.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mariakatosvichM Offline
                                mariakatosvichM Offline
                                mariakatosvich
                                wrote on last edited by mariakatosvich
                                #20

                                I find the rules somewhere, such that I can format the snippet differently?I just have tried myself being told it was spam when trying to post code.
                                Thanks
                                My Expertise - setup nfs server Kubernetes

                                "A pen in the hand of this president is far more dangerous than a gun in the hands of 200 million law-abiding citizens."

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • SGaistS Offline
                                  SGaistS Offline
                                  SGaist
                                  Lifetime Qt Champion
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  Hi,

                                  I usually append c++ after the opening three back ticks when writing C++ code.

                                  Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
                                  Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups
                                  • Search
                                  • Get Qt Extensions
                                  • Unsolved