Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General talk
  3. The Lounge
  4. Changes at Nokia
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Changes at Nokia

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
27 Posts 12 Posters 13.5k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    lgeyer
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Well, Meltemi seems to be gone ...

    bq. "It is official – the dream of a great mobile product in Nokia Ulm is over."
    "Naren Karattup":https://twitter.com/nkaratt/status/213202227379179520
    Qt Software, Head of Global Consultancy at Nokia

    ... as well as Qt for the next billion.

    bq. Next billion strategy is based on Java. Period!
    "Eero Penttinen":https://twitter.com/eeropenttinen/status/213209218164076544
    Domain Lead, Qt for MeeGo R&D at Nokia

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      jaak
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      What about Qt. It will be sold !?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sierdzioS Offline
        sierdzioS Offline
        sierdzio
        Moderators
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        This is very, very bad news indeed. :(

        (Z(:^

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          jaak
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Really think either Intel or RIM should take Qt.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Offline
            J Offline
            jaak
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Regarding next billion, Asha touch won't survive against even low end Android. So extremely poor decision.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sierdzioS Offline
              sierdzioS Offline
              sierdzio
              Moderators
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Oh, I think we all have nice and bright thoughts about where Qt could go, who should do what, and who should buy whom. The problem is, we are not making those decisions...

              (Z(:^

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                deion
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                I really hope Nokia sells Qt and sets it free: just imagine using Qt/QML to do easy development on iOS/Android (the true next billion) because the buyer will commercially support porting Qt on these platforms. As a Qt dev this would be a dream come true.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sierdzioS Offline
                  sierdzioS Offline
                  sierdzio
                  Moderators
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  [quote author="deion" date="1339684279"]As a Qt dev this would be a dream come true.
                  [/quote]

                  Very true. Maybe we should crowd-ask Elop to sell it wisely (if he intends to sell it at all - let us remember that Qt was not mentioned in the announcement).

                  (Z(:^

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    stephenju
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Maybe this will get Qt back to the right (desktop/embedded) track? :)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      lgeyer
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      And there we have our answer for Qt as well.

                      bq. "We’re fans of Qt, and we’ll continue to support it in the near term, but are being open about looking for opportunities which may be best for this developer framework."
                      "Richard Kerris":http://allthingsd.com/20120614/nokia-to-end-meltemi-effort-for-low-end-smartphones/
                      Global Head of Developer Relations, VP bei Nokia

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Offline
                        L Offline
                        lgeyer
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        bq. "Please give us some time to figure out ourselves what is going on. We have the Qt Contributors Summit next week and a Qt 5 release ongoing. There is plenty of work to do. [...] And now, if you don't mind, I'll keep workin on my Qt CS and Qt 5 launch tasks. :)"
                        "Quim Gil":http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/2012-June/002465.html
                        Qt Project Community Manager

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jaak
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Doesn't Kerris' comment clearly mean they no longer need Qt. And I think it will be good for Qt if it is taken over by some others so that the Qt everywhere potential is realized.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sierdzioS Offline
                            sierdzioS Offline
                            sierdzio
                            Moderators
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @Lukas - this looks rather positive, thanks for sharing. I'm happy they are considerate about Qt, and will be trying not to spoil it.

                            (Z(:^

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              jaak
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Now who could be a good buyer for Qt. Intel , RIM, Samsung ?!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • V Offline
                                V Offline
                                veeraps
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                I guess if Nokia couldn't promote Qt, no one else would buy, Samsung already have their own OS and they are already into Android, RIM is also having their own!!!

                                What is gonna happen to Qt!!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  jaak
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  [quote author="veeraps" date="1339748178"]I guess if Nokia couldn't promote Qt, no one else would buy, Samsung already have their own OS and they are already into Android, RIM is also having their own!!!

                                  What is gonna happen to Qt!! [/quote]

                                  Qt is a development platform and can be made to run on any OS. Qt is an important part of RIM's new BB10 platform. There is also a port going on for Android. Since Qt is opensource, I guess anybody can use it on top of their OS platform just like RIM did. Samsung may use it for Tizen. Don't know how Nokia sees this, but from Kerris' comments, they don't seem to have any problem.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    ivan
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    Qt doesn't need to be /bought/ in order to continue to live. It is now a free software project like any other. And it existed a long time before Nokia acquired Trolltech.

                                    While Nokia is the major (~80% of commits) contributor to Qt (that is, ex-Trolltech people), they are not the only one.

                                    I'd really like to see some company like KDAB (the second contributor) or a new company (possibly called Trolltech :) ) to emerge as the new guardian and de-facto support provider.

                                    The important thing is that there is a market for Qt and that there still are parties interested in it. It remains to be seen whether the market for Qt is big enough to keep the pace of development it currently has.

                                    Ivan Čukić | ivan.cukic(at)kde.org | KDE e.V.
                                    Qt Ambassador (from the old Nokia days)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      broadpeak
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      I hope Intel will buy the Qt...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        utcenter
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        What I find amazing is Intel is surprisingly non-enthusiastic when it comes to software. They have long been in a position of being able to deliver complete hardware platforms, or a complete solution on hardware level, and even thou they have all the resources a company could ask for, then never went the extra step to create a complete in-house platform solution, both hardware and software. All they have is their compiler, some other development tools, some drivers and that's pretty much it.

                                        In another thread I pointed our Samsung as a company that can be interested in purchasing Qt. Samsung produce a complete hardware platform too, have a nice market share in mobile devices and even thou so far they rely on Android, they also offer their own software enhancements. Currently, Android is the only obstacle Samsung has to completely PWN Apple, and purchasing Qt can get them much closer to the goal of having their own OS with a high performance, native framework.

                                        What is even better, since they already have many Android devices on the market, they may very well officially support Qt on Android, cuz I doubt they will just leave behind their current user base like some other * cough * companies, switching to a new OS...

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          bluebugs
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Forget about Samsung, they already have a full access to the Enlightenment Foundation Library, a free C fast, ligth and highly themable tooklit designed by the Enlightenment project for embedded and ressource constrained hardware from the ground. This library already include widget build on top of a scene graph (Evas) with a theme engine getting the layout from file description (Edje), that work perfectly with OpenGL, OpenGL ES and even with just software.

                                          And they are already using it in Tizen for all the native UI application. That's why Samsung never needed Qt in Tizen, because they have something that already fit the embedded world much better than Qt does.

                                          Now, it's time for the Qt project to prove that it is a really open source project. That it doesn't need anymore the umbrella of one big company and get contribution from much more wide range of company. Maybe that's a good thing as it will mean that one company will not decide for its futur, and make it as resistant as the Linux kernel is.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved