Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Installation and Deployment
  4. [solved] Questions on deployment
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

[solved] Questions on deployment

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Installation and Deployment
34 Posts 5 Posters 18.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mzimmersM Offline
    mzimmersM Offline
    mzimmers
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Andre -

    How do I go about determining which Qt DLLs an application needs? Currently, when I use a CLI to try to start an app, it just returns without any error messages (and without starting the app, too.)

    And, if I'm currently not using any Qt features, am I correct in assuming that I'm not using any plugins? Or, does the directory need to be there anyway?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      andre
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      There are tools for that. Roughly, each Qt module you use (have enabled in your .pro file) has a corresponding dll that you need to distribute. Next to that, you also need to distribute dll's that depend on your toolchain. With MinGw, that would be mingwm10.dll and libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll.

      The "Dependency Walker":http://www.dependencywalker.com/ tool will tell you all you need to know about the dependencies of your application.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mzimmersM Offline
        mzimmersM Offline
        mzimmers
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Interesting. According to Dependency Walker, there are five dependencies:

        • c:\windows\system32\KERNEL32.DLL
        • c:\qtsdk\mingw\bin\MINGWM10.DLL
        • c:\windows\system32\MSVCRT.DLL
        • c:\windows\system32\MSVCRT.DLL
        • c:\qtsdk\mingw\bin\LIBGCC_S_DW2-1.DLL

        All but the fourth one are expandable in DW to reveal other DLLs, but I assume that's not a problem.

        So, did I understand you correctly that now I need to make copies of these and place them in the execution directory? Is any change to the build process necessary?

        And, do I really copy the kernel32.dll? Or should I expect that the user will have that on his system?

        Thanks...I finally feel like I'm getting somewhere.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Offline
          K Offline
          koahnig
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          You may want to try it. It will tell you the missing dlls. A customer is certainly not the best place to test this ;) That is only done with operation systems :)

          The system32 dlls are depending on your operation system installed. AFAIK you do not need those.

          But you do not have Qt dlls in your list ! ? !

          Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Offline
            G Offline
            goetz
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            With MinGW you need:

            • libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll
            • libgomp-1.dll
            • libpthread-2.dll
            • libstdc++-6.dll

            Everything else that dependency walker reports is usually installed in the system of a windows box.

            And the Qt libs:

            • QtCore4.dll
            • QtGui4.dll

            And later on, whatever you have as additional Qt modules (network, xml, webkit...) as well as the plugins (iconengines, imageformats, sqldrivers...). But that's pretty much the same on every platform.

            With MinGW you're done with putting all those DLLs besides your executable (exepct the plugins, these go into subdirs as usual), you do not need to install the C/C++ runtimes in a system directory as with MSVC's vcredist.exe.

            http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mzimmersM Offline
              mzimmersM Offline
              mzimmers
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Hi, Volker. Good to hear from you. So, why is it that some of the libraries you mention aren't shown by Dependency Walker? Or, maybe I just don't know how to use the tool?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G Offline
                G Offline
                goetz
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Because dependency walker only shows the dependencies of the exe or dll you load into it and the DLLs that it can reach.

                So, let's suppose you have prog.exe that depends on fancy.dll and that fancy.dll depends on standard.dll then, if you do not have fancy.dll reachable bye depends.exe, it only shows that prog.exe depends on fancy.dll. As soon as you make fancy.dll reachable, it shows you that standard.dll is also needed.

                http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mzimmersM Offline
                  mzimmersM Offline
                  mzimmers
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Oh, so using it is something of an iterative process, then. Makes sense.

                  As far as copying these .dlls to the application directory, is it a simple matter of a file-system copy, or must these be handled in a special way?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Offline
                    G Offline
                    goetz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Just a copy, nothing special you have to treat. You can put everything into a script (.bat or, if you have MSYS running, even a shell (bash) script) that makes this for you.

                    http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mzimmersM Offline
                      mzimmersM Offline
                      mzimmers
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      Is it possible to put the libraries in a subdirectory (the way one would with the plugins)? That would keep things a bit cleaner.

                      Or, I suppose, I could create a directory for runtime only...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mzimmersM Offline
                        mzimmersM Offline
                        mzimmers
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        Well, after playing with Dependency Walker for a bit, I now realize that I don't understand exactly how to use the information it supplies. How do I go about ensuring that I've locally supplied all necessary libraries? Do I need to remove or disable the paths to them in my PATH environment variable? Because it seems that DW will list them whether or not I've locally supplied them.

                        Also, I don't seem to have a file "libpthread-2.dll" on my system. I do have a "libpthread.a" which I take it is a static library. Should I move this over?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          john_god
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          Perhaps the best way for you is forget about dependency walker for now.

                          Most Qt ddl you will need should be in C:\QtSDK\Desktop\Qt\4.7.4\mingw\bin . If you don't have this diretory in your system path, your program will not work outside QtCreator, i.e if you run the executable from file explorer.
                          Then create a new directory with your exe file, paste the files that Volker already told you, one by one, until your program starts working from the file explorer. Then you should have all the necessary files in that directory ready to go.
                          You can now zipped, or better, create a fancy setup.exe package. I usually use install creator (http://www.clickteam.com/website/usa/install-creator.html) but there are manny others and perhaps better programs to pack you software. It's very easy to use, and doenst require any scripting.

                          You could install dll files in windows system or system32 directory, thats usually the windows way of installing things, but that can cause some problems that I'm not going to talk about here, so perhaps it's best to keep it simple and install all dll files in the same directory of your exe file, usually C:\Program Files (x86)\your_program

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mzimmersM Offline
                            mzimmersM Offline
                            mzimmers
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            Hey, John - thanks for the reply. A few notes:

                            I'm using 4.8.0, not 4.7.4.

                            I'm trying to get this working on a program that uses no QT libraries.

                            I still have an unidentified file (libpthread-2.dll)

                            probably because of #3, when I run the DW profiler, I get some output that looks rather unsuccessful. I'll postpone posting it until I get that last file that Volker mentioned resolved.

                            So, again, I'm kind of going for "proof of concept" here. I just want to know that I can make this work. Once I'm successful with this program, I'll start using the same technique with those that will use the Qt libraries. Right now, though, I'm stuck until I get that final file nailed down.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G Offline
                              G Offline
                              goetz
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              I don't use the SDK builds, but a stand alone MinGW installation + manually compiled Qt libs. I don't know the exact setup of the SDK and how all the libs are named there. But, all the needed DLLs are in the SDK, otherwise you wouldn't be able to run the apps from Qt Creator :-)

                              http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mzimmersM Offline
                                mzimmersM Offline
                                mzimmers
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                [quote author="Volker" date="1334132257"]I don't use the SDK builds, but a stand alone MinGW installation + manually compiled Qt libs. I don't know the exact setup of the SDK and how all the libs are named there. But, all the needed DLLs are in the SDK, otherwise you wouldn't be able to run the apps from Qt Creator :-)[/quote]

                                At present, my concern isn't whether the SDK supplies everything or not; it's whether I've successfully copied all files that are necessary to my executable's directory.

                                Again, since the SDK is in my PATH variable, how do I know that when my program needs a library, it's getting it from the local directory and not via PATH? Do I need to remove the SDK from PATH to test this?

                                I hope this makes sense; it's 4 AM here.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  goetz
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  Ah, I see. To test without the SDK do not remove it, it's sufficient to just rename the toplevel directory (e.g. from QtSDK to QtSDK-Blocked) and the do the tests. That's what I do regularly. Don't forget to re-rename it afterwards, otherwise your builds will fail :-)

                                  To see where your DLLs are from, you can switch dependency walker to show the full paths, instead of the filenames only (F9 if I remember correctly).

                                  And as far as I remember, local DLLs take precedence over those in the PATH. Except for those that nee a manifest and where windows insists on them residing somewhere in a system directory. But this is neither true for MinGW nor the Qt DLLs.

                                  http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mzimmersM Offline
                                    mzimmersM Offline
                                    mzimmers
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    Well, after so many false starts, I hesitate to claim victory, but it appears that it's working.

                                    I'm still using a couple files from my \windows\syswow64 directory (KERNEL32.DLL and MSVCRT.DLL) but I imagine that's OK. (As a side note, that MSVCRT file isn't a Visual C file is it? I'd have no idea how that crept in there.)

                                    I guess the acid test is to send this to someone without Qt and have them try it, huh?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      goetz
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      You could start with "Mission Accomplished" ;-)

                                      msvcrt.dll is the microsoft C runtime library. It is used by MinGW too, as MinGW uses native Windows API. Kernel32.dll is ... the kernel :-) ... it's loaded by all applications, you must not copy that into the app directory.

                                      What DLLs do you have in your application directory now?

                                      For test purposes: I usually have a vanilla windows installation running in a virtual machine. You can install your stuff and roll back to a pristine snapshot once you're done.

                                      http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mzimmersM Offline
                                        mzimmersM Offline
                                        mzimmers
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        [quote author="Volker" date="1334162833"]What DLLs do you have in your application directory now?[/quote]

                                        • libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll
                                        • libgomp-1.dll
                                        • libpthread.a
                                        • libstdc++6.dll
                                        • mingwm10.dll

                                        You suppose I should probably take msvcrt.dll, too?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          goetz
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          This looks good. You do not need msvcrt.dll.

                                          http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups
                                          • Search
                                          • Get Qt Extensions
                                          • Unsolved