Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Overriding QDir::homePath()
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Overriding QDir::homePath()

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General and Desktop
17 Posts 6 Posters 9.1k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    d2uriel
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Have you tested this method on different kinds of OS'? What is it returning on Windows/Linux/MacOSX?

    "Do not judge, and you will never be mistaken." - Jean-Jacques Rousseau

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      redkite
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      From doc :

      bq. Under Windows this function will return the directory of the current user's profile. Typically, this is:
      C:/Documents and Settings/Username

      bq. Under non-Windows operating systems the HOME environment variable is used if it exists, otherwise the path returned by the rootPath().

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        goetz
        wrote on last edited by tekojo
        #6

        On Windows, the user directory is searched in the following order, the first method that returns a valid[1] path is used:

        • The value returned by GetUserProfileDirectoryW Windows API call
        • The value of USERPROFILE environment variable
        • The value of HOMEDRIVE + HOMEPATH environment variables
        • The value of HOME environment variable
        • The value of SystemDrive environment variable (no check for existence)
        • "C:/" (hard coded as last resort, no check for existence)

        fn1. valid means the method returns a value and the directory denoted by that value does exist

        http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Offline
          L Offline
          lwcorp
          wrote on last edited by tekojo
          #7

          [quote author="Volker" date="1332108047"]

          • The value returned by GetUserProfileDirectoryW Windows API call[/quote]
            So my question is how does GetUserProfileDirectoryW work. Had I understood it, maybe I could have bypassed it.
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Offline
            G Offline
            goetz
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            I don't know the internals. Thats Windows API and I avoid digging into that wherever I can :-) Some Google search may get you more details. Usually that method returns "C:/Documents and Settings/USER" on Win2k/XP and "C:/Users/USER" on Vista/Win7.

            http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Offline
              L Offline
              lgeyer
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Just to let me get this right: you want to modify the behaviour of an existing binary, you are not a developer who wants to modify its own sourcecode or application.

              Well, I guess you are left with four options then, in the order of work and stress involved

              • recompile the binary not using QDir::homePath() or
              • file a bug report or a merge request which modifies the behaviour of QDir::homePath() in a way that <code>%USERPROFILE%</code> takes precedence over GetUserProfileDirectoryW or
              • distribute the binary with a patched set of the Qt libraries which modify the behaviour of QDir::homePath() or
              • hook GetUserProfileDirectoryW directly to modify its behaviour.

              I'm not quite sure as of right now but I tend to say that <code>%USERPROFILE%</code> and <code>%HOME%</code> should take precedence over GetUserProfileDirectoryW just to cover cases like yours (where you want to temporarily redirect the home directory) and to get a more consistent cross-platform behaviour.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Offline
                L Offline
                lwcorp
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Would you be kind enough to submit that bug report? I don't seem to find such an option anywhere.

                Had I understood GetUserProfileDirectoryW, I could have somehow bypassed it without actually modifying the code.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  andre
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  The bugsystem is currently at https://bugreports.qt-project.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    lwcorp
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    "Thanks!":https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-24907

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G Offline
                      G Offline
                      goetz
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      Regarding the text in your bugreport:

                      bq. Various standalone portable softwares could have been forced to become portable, if only they hadn't stored their data in a path that involves QDir::homePath().

                      A sane Qt application doesn't use homePath() for that, but calls QDesktopServices::storageLocation() with, for example, QDesktopServices::DataLocation as argument. These methods do not use homePath() under the hood (or only as a last resort), but call SHGetFolderPath() on Windows, which is native Windows API again.

                      http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Offline
                        L Offline
                        lwcorp
                        wrote on last edited by tekojo
                        #14

                        The OP links to at least 2 programs that do this. Well, if their authors knew what they were doing, they would have accepted an "/ini=" command line parameter in the first place.

                        But what advantage does SHGetFolderPath() offer? Can it easily be bypassed?

                        BTW:

                        bq. Deprecated

                        • SHGetFolderPath function, Microsoft MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb762181(v=vs.85).aspx
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          andre
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          Deprecated for Vista and up, but Qt also runs on XP, where the replacement function does not exist yet.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Offline
                            L Offline
                            lwcorp
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            Please answer:

                            bq. But what advantage does SHGetFolderPath() offer? Can it easily be bypassed?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G Offline
                              G Offline
                              goetz
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              [quote author="lwcorp" date="1337853314"]Please answer:

                              bq. But what advantage does SHGetFolderPath() offer? Can it easily be bypassed?[/quote]

                              Advantage: it is official API, although deprecated. But as Andre already mentioned, as long as Qt is running on XP, one will have to use it, as the replacement isn't there.

                              Bypassing: I don't know, as I never had a need to do this.

                              http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups
                              • Search
                              • Get Qt Extensions
                              • Unsolved