General and Desktop

@Jammin44fm It seems the solution was to use; qRegisterMetaType<JSValue>("JSValue"); Earlier in the code to register JSValue as a meta Type. I had already tried this, but was missing the string "JSValue" from the call. So it seems that both the type and the string are required. All good working now, Hopefully it will all work in 6.5 too, as it seems Qt has removed the string variant from the SDK.

Sorry for the delay. @Diego-Iastrubni said in qrc:/mainQml.qml:4:1: module "QmlApp" is not installed: my top level cmake contains: add_subdirectory(QmlApp) ... target_link_libraries(pass-simple PRIVATE ... QmlApp ... ) Link to QmlAppplugin instead of QmlApp Still the same error on runtime. I can also see the same error when I run from the command line - without QtCreator. I asked for the version of Qt that you're using, but didn't get an answer. Anyway, see https://www.qt.io/blog/whats-new-for-qml-modules-in-6.5 -- Use Qt 6.5, add qt_standard_project_setup(REQUIRES 6.5) to your top-level CMakeLists.txt and call engine.loadFromModule() instead of engine.load()

@JonB Looks like I'm rewriting the whole class

Hi, Which version of Qt are you using ? Can you provide a minimal compilable example that reproduces your issue ?

@arame Search this forum for many identical posts. Set environment variable QT_DEBUG_PLUGINS to value 1, run your script, see end of diagnostic output.

It seems like I needed to manually add: QByteArray boundary = bookCover->boundary(); request.setHeader(QNetworkRequest::ContentTypeHeader, "multipart/form-data; boundary=" + boundary); Now

@Daniella I added Q_ENUM(Orientation) but it still 19

@JonB Awesome, thank you very much. In response to your points: I have timed the current single threaded approach, and I'm looking at implementing the multi-threaded approach as a means of benchmarking the two approaches. As it stands, the worst case scenario would require parsing the SQL results hundreds of times, so I expect there will be a crossover point whereby moving from single- to multi-threaded execution makes sense. This is an aspect I haven't really spent much time on as of yet, but I'll certainly look into it. I haven't set the QSqlQuery to forward-only, thank you for the recommendation!

@Chris-Kawa How can I programmatically display that menu for app windows? Found it QMainWindow::createPopupMenu()

@moryaden Thank you so much for this solution.

@Clemens-Wasser sorry? You need to use the QWinEventNotifier in the ReadFile, WriteFile, and ConnectToPipe functions, just fill the OVERLAPPED.hEvent field with the CreateEvent. OR, you can copy/paste the private QWinOverlappedIONotifier which was deprecated a while time ago to watch an events directly on a HANDLE. See, e.g.sources of the QSerialPort, as I remember, as an example.

@Andy314 the Qt models are indeed not optimized for very slow database connections so building your own model is a good plan. That said, accessing a database directly over internet is usually a pretty bad idea security wise even if the connection is in encrypted.

Solved by dowonload, compile and install openssl-1.1.1.

@ChrisW67 finally, I find that use for loop would be same. for(int i=0;i<25;i++) { ui->pLayout->setRowStretch(i,25); }

@dearqt The webEngine moudle only have header and source files. It does not have the library files. So, you need to compile that on your own. Go to that directory and run the command window, there you should compile the library. Once compiled, it generates the library Qt5WebView.dll and Qt5WebView.a

@vagesh Could be related to https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-76983

@KAVAN said in HID: HID Board STM32 As with any USB HID client device, plug it in. Your operating system will recognise it as a keyboard, mouse or other human interface device. A Qt (or any other) program will react to the keyboard and mouse inputs.

@arcy If you use Qt on both sides you can use https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qdatastream.html

@Qtpp said in Include code from GitHub in Qt project: but it failed This does not help to understand and solve the problem. You should provide more details...