Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Behind the Scenes
  3. Qt.io webservices
  4. Qt documentation format
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Qt documentation format

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Qt.io webservices
2 Posts 2 Posters 1.3k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alek Śmierciak
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi,

    browsing a little through the oldest (Qt4.7) documentation on DevNet I came to a conclusion that previous format has had some benefits. For example, class members and methods in a table, with folding and ready hyperlinks to source code.
    Compare:
    "QDate from Qt4.7":http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.7/qdate.html
    "QDate from Qt5.0":http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtcore/qdate.html

    Who gets to decide on the documentation format and is it possible to propose changes, perhaps in a "vote for" style?

    Thanks for any input and thoughts,
    Alek

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sierdzioS Offline
      sierdzioS Offline
      sierdzio
      Moderators
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Write to "web mailing list":http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/web or IRC channel.

      Judging from the looks, current format is taken directly from QDoc, so it looks the same in Assistant and here.

      (Z(:^

      1 Reply Last reply
      0

      • Login

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Users
      • Groups
      • Search
      • Get Qt Extensions
      • Unsolved