Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Behind the Scenes
  3. Qt.io webservices
  4. [Suggestion] Combinations of tags
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

[Suggestion] Combinations of tags

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Qt.io webservices
9 Posts 6 Posters 2.9k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    koahnig
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    As one can see in this "thread ":http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/7785/ Tags have a more prominent place for access now.

    Starting to type changes immediately the list of possible tags. This is really great and helps a lot.
    From my point of view it would be helpful to extend the functionality. At the moment one needs to decide for one tag to use in the search. A possibility to enter a second tag allowing a combined search for threads having the two tags in common (e.g. "linux" and "cross-compile") would be really great. Certainly one may wish to have an "unlimited" count of different tags, but in general a max of three I would consider as most sufficient.

    BTW I have checked the "Advanced search", but it did not provide what I was looking for. Or at least I did not find.

    Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Offline
      C Offline
      changsheng230
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Some extent of tags merge is necessary, but it might need a lot of extra work to do it, and the priority might be not on the top.

      Chang Sheng
      常升

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Offline
        L Offline
        leon.anavi
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        +1

        This proposition seems reasonable as it will provide much better searching and navigation though the pages :)

        http://anavi.org/

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • EddyE Offline
          EddyE Offline
          Eddy
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Hi all,

          We had a similar discussion a while ago.
          "Here is the link :":http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/7147

          "Please vote for it here!":http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTWEBSITE-248

          Marius liked the idea also!

          Cheers,

          Eddy

          Qt Certified Specialist
          www.edalsolutions.be

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K Offline
            K Offline
            koahnig
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Thanks Eddy for pointing to the other thread. Certainly I have deposited my vote on JIRA :-)

            Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • EddyE Offline
              EddyE Offline
              Eddy
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              You're welcome!

              Hopefully this can be added in the next version of devnet that should get on the web this summer. As the number of topics and tags are growing it's getting more and more difficult to find what you need.

              Qt Certified Specialist
              www.edalsolutions.be

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Offline
                K Offline
                koahnig
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Yes, you are right. Hopefully we see it in the next version. In my personal opinion I would formulate a harder. The tags may be useless soon, because of teh large variety of possibilities.

                At the beginning a simple "and" of two tags ignoring all dependencies would be sufficient. An acceptable answer is then "no match".

                The more sophisticated approach would be narrowing the choices in a second window by the choices of the first window. That would be a first class solution.

                However, one may raise nice ideas without knowing what the details are behind the implementation. The first approach might be much easier to realize, while the second approach "smells" like required throughput and some more eloborated programming.

                So, let us see what the Trolls are coming up with ;-)

                Vote the answer(s) that helped you to solve your issue(s)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  mgran
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  We like it a lot as well, and as said by koahnig it's simply needed -> so it's in development right now :) (and has been for a month)

                  More info here: QTWEBSITE-135

                  It's our highest voted issue in JIRA even, we aim to please :)

                  Project Manager - Qt Development Frameworks

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    saidiahd
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    +1
                    Grate proposition @koahnig koahnig

                    "Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow." - Albert Einstein -

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0

                    • Login

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups
                    • Search
                    • Get Qt Extensions
                    • Unsolved