[Suggestion] Mark pages to be renamed with standardized tag and to-do message

giesbert

I would do it on ablock, but that's personal opinion

stukdev

I see most wiki have a tag please rename.
What this mean? For example HowToUseGravatar_Italian rename name in what?
What is the standard name for translate article?

I was think nameBase + _ + language

Wolf P.

[quote author="stuk" date="1292401250"]I see most wiki have a tag please rename.
What this mean? For example HowToUseGravatar_Italian rename name in what?
What is the standard name for translate article?

I was think nameBase + _ + language[/quote]

I think here is the base name addressed: Use of underscores instead of CamelCase. But I don't know... Maybe Gerolf knows more about this.

giesbert

The idea was first tro gi to CamelCase only
then there were discussions and polls, and I think, the result was, leave the names with CamelCase or Underscore.

Wolf P.

Then we should simple remove the tags for pages when the intention is not clear. As I suggested above, the target title should be named on the page, so that the Admins are able to do what nobody else can do.

giesbert

But do we have an agreement, how we want to proceed? I think is was: Let everyone name the pages, how they want, but in English, right?

Wolf P.

I changed the topic. Is the intention now easier to get? Please review! Thanks :)

Wolf P.

[quote author="Gerolf Reinwardt" date="1292413248"]But do we have an agreement, how we want to proceed? I think is was: Let everyone name the pages, how they want, but in English, right?[/quote]
Maybe, I'm not sure. As I remember, the language part should be appended with underscore.

The problem that I actually wanted to solve with this Post, is a technical one:
To find a simple way for wiki users to get renaming done by the Admins.

? This user is from outside of this forum

nice wok guys

stukdev

Sorry but i don't understand...
if the english page it 'page', for my translation i have to rename 'page_Italian' or 'pageItalian' ?

Wolf P.

No. Naming conventions is not subject of this thread, but only the renaming procedure itself.
I think naming conventions should be discussed and elaborated (in new thread(s)).