Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Behind the Scenes
  3. Qt.io webservices
  4. [solved] annoying "Search..." in input line at tag search
Qt 6.11 is out! See what's new in the release blog

[solved] annoying "Search..." in input line at tag search

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Qt.io webservices
15 Posts 4 Posters 7.0k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    hm... don't know exactly, it's slow, but tutorial deletes any input, whereas "Search..." is mostly combined.

    If the "Search..." would be killed completety, I would find it more comfortable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      baysmith
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      I've had the same problem.

      [quote author="mariusg" date="1291907962"]Sounds like the JavaScript is slow to load.

      If you click this link: http://developer.qt.nokia.com/tags/?tag_search=tutorial

      Equally slow?[/quote]

      I find this faster.

      Nokia Certified Qt Specialist.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Offline
        ? Offline
        A Former User
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        I noticed the same thing.... In fact, took me a few times before I noticed that it would actually delete the "Search..." by itself.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Offline
          ? Offline
          A Former User
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          We shall remove the "Search..." text, thanks for the feedback.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ? Offline
            ? Offline
            A Former User
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            Thanks. Have you already added this to the bugtracker? (when yes:) Where?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Offline
              ? Offline
              A Former User
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              ...and what about the obfuscating Uppercasing appearing at the list of items tagged with a particular tag mentioned "here":https://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/2016/#9554 ?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ? Offline
                ? Offline
                A Former User
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                We're going to make the Tag module case-insensitive so we don't have issues like that. It's on the list, but not for the coming release.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  A Former User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Marius, please have a close look at what get when you click on a beta tag:
                  "Beta":http://developer.qt.nokia.com/search/tag/beta
                  (the uppecase Beta in the page title dosn't matter at all)

                  You'll see this line on top of the page:
                  Content tagged with Beta Looking for other tags?

                  The uppercase Beta following the phrase "Content tagged with" is my problem.
                  ...I cannot believe that this little bug has to wait for a further release, or...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    A Former User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    That is indeed a minor issue and the fix for that has already been committed to our git repository. The change was from:

                    @$tags[$key] = ucwords($tag); @

                    to

                    @$tags[$key] = $tag;@

                    We release a new version of DevNet every two weeks. Should there be critical issues in between releases we of course push them live right away.

                    I know it looks like a quick fix that could be pushed out in 5 minutes but - as many developers are sure to know - in the long run it's better to have a good release process and not touch the live environment too often[1]. Even trivial things can surprise you.

                    We typically fix 20-40 issues per release and by doing it in this bi-weekly fashion we ensure proper testing and some order for the release manager and the developers.

                    fn1. Actually, one day, we want to do "continuous deployment":http://toni.org/2010/05/19/in-praise-of-continuous-deployment-the-wordpress-com-story/ but we're not there yet.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      A Former User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      [quote author="mariusg" date="1291990521"]That is indeed a minor issue and the fix for that has already been committed to our git repository. The change was from:

                      @$tags[$key] = ucwords($tag); @

                      to

                      @$tags[$key] = $tag;@ [/quote]
                      How good, that I insisted in this point ;) ...and it improves the performance :)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        A Former User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        “Search…” is gone now :)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          A Former User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          :) That's phantastic!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups
                          • Search
                          • Get Qt
                          • Unsolved