[Bug] Report function doesn't work
-
Odd. I received reports. I'll poke Gurudutt about it.
And when it comes to spam: absolutely, please report it!
Even if the moderators see the posts as well and delete them I'd like to know. Otherwise it's really hard to find out which users to ban for spamming.
-
What I usually do in those cases:
Hit the report button, and copy the user URL into it, and a sample of the spam (like the offending spam link & text). Then, at the end, I add "deleted by Andre", send the report, and then go ahead actually deleting the spam message. That way, the superadmins still have access to the important information, but the spam remains on the site as short as possible. -
I just did quick test with our test user which have zero point .... but I didn't received message above ... I am doing further investigation and I will get back asap.
-
I regularly report SPAM a couple of times a week and I never had problems recently. Maybe some too fast reporting of SPAM made the mail filter think that someone is sending SPAM to the superadmins? :-)
-
I just tried to report "Gurudutts post":http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/6719/#57008 and I received the following mail (if you need any further details please let me know).
[quote]This is the mail system at host vifsla.nokia.kunder.linpro.no.I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
alexandra.leisse@nokia.com: host mx1.nokia.com[147.243.142.136] said: 551
5.0.0 DKIM or SPF failed (in reply to end of DATA command)qt-devnet@nokia.com: host mx1.nokia.com[147.243.142.136] said: 551 5.0.0 DKIM
or SPF failed (in reply to end of DATA command)
[/quote]
details.txt
[quote]
Reporting-MTA: dns; vifsla.nokia.kunder.linpro.no
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 357E928793
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; <EDITED>
Arrival-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:27:04 +0200 (CEST)Final-Recipient: rfc822; alexandra.leisse@nokia.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; mx1.nokia.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 551 5.0.0 DKIM or SPF failedFinal-Recipient: rfc822; qt-devnet@nokia.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; mx1.nokia.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 551 5.0.0 DKIM or SPF failed
[/quote]
Reported Content
[quote]Someone reported content on Qt Developer NetworkReported Content: http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewreply/57008
Report Time: 2011-09-23 12:27This content was reported by:
Name (member_id): Lukas Geyer (11813)
Profile: http://developer.qt.nokia.com/member/11813
IP: 178.73.217.85
E-Mail: <EDITED>Message
This is just a test report to test the report function as discussed in http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/6719/.
=================================================================
Author of the content is :
Screen Name (member_id): 4 (4)
Profile: http://developer.qt.nokia.com/member/4Content :
I just did quick test with our test user which have zero point .... but I didn't received message above ... I am doing further investigation and I will get back asap.
.
[/quote] -
Hi Lukas Geyer,
Thank you for details.
We have some clue about the issue and we are looking in to solution.
As soon we fix it I will ask you to test it.
-
Should this have been fixed? I just wanted to mention that I still recieve those <code>5.0.0 DKIM or SPF failed (in reply to end of DATA command)</code> mails.
-
Hi Lukas,
We know the real cause of this issue and it is some hosting and domain related issue, but I have some limitation here and it is dependent task in fact before fixing this we are facing some political challenges, I can assure that this shouldn't take long to fix it but of-course I can't give you timeline here.
I am sorry for delay here and I hope I will resolve this issue soon. -
No worries! I just stumbled upon it a few hours ago and I thought I'm going to refresh this thread so it won't get lost. I can live perfectly without it - thankfully there isn't much to report here ;-)
-
Just for Info, the problem persists.
I tried to report a spam thread and received the already quoted "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" notification to my e-mail account.
-
Just tried it right now, I only get two out of office notifications.
-
This is what I get (also twice):
@
This is the mail system at host tufsla.qtproject.c.bitbit.net.I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.The mail system
alexandra.leisse@nokia.com: host mx2.nokia.com[147.243.177.58] said: 551
5.0.0 SPF failed (in reply to end of DATA command)Reporting-MTA: dns; tufsla.qtproject.c.bitbit.net
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 9728A9899E
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; my mail here
Arrival-Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 09:16:52 +0200 (CEST)Final-Recipient: rfc822; alexandra.leisse@nokia.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; mx2.nokia.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 551 5.0.0 SPF failed
@ -
Yes, the problem is Alexandra left Nokia. I also reported this.
-
oops :(
I am looking into this .... brb soon
-
I have removed email of Alexandra from system now.
if you still get this issue please inform here I will do further investigation. -
Still doesn't work for me (it actually never did).
[quote]This is the mail system at host fork.qtproject.c.bitbit.net.I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.The mail system
alexandra.leisse@nokia.com (expanded from devnet@qt-project.org): host
mx1.nokia.com[147.243.142.137] said: 551 5.0.0 SPF failed (in reply to end
of DATA command)gurudutt.verma@nokia.com (expanded from devnet@qt-project.org): host
mx1.nokia.com[147.243.142.137] said: 551 5.0.0 SPF failed (in reply to end
of DATA command)marius.granholt@nokia.com (expanded from devnet@qt-project.org): host
mx1.nokia.com[147.243.142.137] said: 551 5.0.0 SPF failed (in reply to end
of DATA command)Reporting-MTA: dns; fork.qtproject.c.bitbit.net
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 76D4330456
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; <snip>
Arrival-Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:30:04 +0200 (CEST)Final-Recipient: rfc822; alexandra.leisse@nokia.com
Original-Recipient: rfc822;devnet@qt-project.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; mx1.nokia.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 551 5.0.0 SPF failedFinal-Recipient: rfc822; gurudutt.verma@nokia.com
Original-Recipient: rfc822;devnet@qt-project.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; mx1.nokia.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 551 5.0.0 SPF failedFinal-Recipient: rfc822; marius.granholt@nokia.com
Original-Recipient: rfc822;devnet@qt-project.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; mx1.nokia.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 551 5.0.0 SPF failedReported Content.eml
Betreff:
Reported Content
Von:
"Qt Developer Network Report Content Bot" <snip>
Datum:
02.07.2012 15:30
An:
devnet@qt-project.org
Kopie (CC):
alexandra.leisse@nokia.comSomeone reported content on Qt Developer Network
Reported Content: http://qt-project.org/forums/viewreply/90329
Report Time: 2012-07-02 15:30This content was reported by:
Name (member_id): Lukas Geyer (11813)
Profile: http://qt-project.org/member/11813
IP: 178.73.212.231
E-Mail: <snip>Message
Test (http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/6719/P15/)
=================================================================
Author of the content is :
Screen Name (member_id): 4 (4)
Profile: http://qt-project.org/member/4Content :
I have removed email of Alexandra from system now.
if you still get this issue please inform here I will do further
investigation.
.[/quote] -
:(
I am on it
-
Lukas, you might want to remove your email address from that post you made...
-
Yes I might want. Thanks ;-)
-
Hi
We have found the issue here and discussing it to choose one of several solution, the best and fastest :)