[Solved] List of all members, including inherited members in devnet docs

Eddy

Thanks,

In that case please vote for it using the link above ;)
We need votes to make the elves make it happen.

B4adle7

Rating added :P

Chris H

Make sure you are voting it up at the "Bug report page":https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTWEBSITE-265 (the vote link is in the upper right side of that page), and not just here in the forums.

Eddy

[quote author="Chris H" date="1323991195"]Make sure you are voting it up at the "Bug report page":https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTWEBSITE-265 (the vote link is in the upper right side of that page), and not just here in the forums.[/quote]

Thanks Chris.
I didn't notice everyone was using the thum up here in the forum. That mechanism is only used in conjunction with the tagging system. If you search using a tag, the results with the most forum votes is shown first and ordered in that way.

As an additional information for new devnet members: to vote on the bugtracker you have to register there too. Your membership on devnet is not enough. It is advised to use the same email address there as you use here. It doesn't take much time to register there also ;)

mgran

Thanks folks, this issue is definitely on the radar. CSI Oslo is on the case looking for the missing members.

Eddy

Thanks for the feedback Marius.

mgran

We have easily doubled the traffic now that 4.8 doc lives here - so don't be shy on the feedback, we want the awesome Qt documentation to also be awesomely presented :)

PS: posting from 10 972 m above Finland somewhere moving at 782 km/h, free wifi on a plane, how cool is that :)

Eddy

I knew it! You're not a troll but an elve, because you can fly ;)

mgran

The list of all members, including inherited members, is back in action for the 4.8 doc: http://developer.qt.nokia.com/doc/qt-4.8/qtableview.html . 4.7 to follow.

andre

Great! Thanks!

Note that I fixed the link to actually work. Adding a period (.) after a URL does not work.

Eddy

Thanks Marius!

that is an important christmas gift for a lot of us.

Just one question :
Is it supposed to have the old docs look back again or is the new look combined with this link something for the near future?

mgran

We had some issues with the new look that we will work on behind the scenes - but until it is 100% awesome we have the traditional look up. Good and familiar for everyone :)