<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[How does the concept of random address type match the whitelist for a BLE peripheral?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi Qt community,</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm wondering how the concept of <strong>static random</strong> and <strong>private address</strong> fits in the QLowEnergyController story?</p>
<p dir="auto">Normally in the whitelist of the peripheral BLE device, the address of the central device is added that is allowed to make the connection. The central device will make a connection to the peripheral based on an BT device address of the peripheral.<br />
But how is this all feasible if the "random" BT address changes from time to time?</p>
<p dir="auto">All clarification and ideas on this topic are very welcome.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Frank</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.qt.io/topic/98602/how-does-the-concept-of-random-address-type-match-the-whitelist-for-a-ble-peripheral</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 19:24:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.qt.io/topic/98602.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:44:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>