Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. General and Desktop
  4. Combine QtConcurrent call
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Combine QtConcurrent call

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved General and Desktop
17 Posts 4 Posters 2.9k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mr Gisa
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I have three methods and all of them returns a string, I want to run all of them using QtConcurrent and get their return into a single list or something like that. QtConcurrent::mapped is ideal as it returns an iterator but I can only run one method at time.
    in JavaScript there's promise.all([method_a, method_b, method_c]) it will automatically merge their return into a single result (iterator).
    How to do that in Qt?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • VRoninV Offline
      VRoninV Offline
      VRonin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Do you have something like this?

      /*static*/ QString MyClass::methodA(const QString & val){/*do something*/ } 
      /*static*/ QString MyClass::methodB(const QString & val){/*do something*/ }
      /*static*/ QString MyClass::methodC(const QString & val){/*do something*/ }
      void MyClass::runCalculation(){
      QStringList myList;
      // fill the list
      QFuture<QString> futRes = QtConcurrent::mappedReduced(
      myList.cbegin(),myList.cend(),
      [](const QString & val)->std::tuple<QString,QString,QString>{return std::make_tuple(MyClass::methodA(val),MyClass::methodB(val),MyClass::methodC(val));}
      , [](QString& base,const QString & result){base+=result;}
      );
      

      "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
      ~Napoleon Bonaparte

      On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

      JonBJ M 2 Replies Last reply
      3
      • VRoninV VRonin

        Do you have something like this?

        /*static*/ QString MyClass::methodA(const QString & val){/*do something*/ } 
        /*static*/ QString MyClass::methodB(const QString & val){/*do something*/ }
        /*static*/ QString MyClass::methodC(const QString & val){/*do something*/ }
        void MyClass::runCalculation(){
        QStringList myList;
        // fill the list
        QFuture<QString> futRes = QtConcurrent::mappedReduced(
        myList.cbegin(),myList.cend(),
        [](const QString & val)->std::tuple<QString,QString,QString>{return std::make_tuple(MyClass::methodA(val),MyClass::methodB(val),MyClass::methodC(val));}
        , [](QString& base,const QString & result){base+=result;}
        );
        
        JonBJ Offline
        JonBJ Offline
        JonB
        wrote on last edited by JonB
        #3

        @VRonin

        [](const QString & val)->std::tuple<QString,QString,QString>{return std::make_tuple(MyClass::methodA(val),MyClass::methodB(val),MyClass::methodC(val));}
        , [](QString& base,const QString & result){base+=result;}
        

        Blimey! :-;

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • VRoninV VRonin

          Do you have something like this?

          /*static*/ QString MyClass::methodA(const QString & val){/*do something*/ } 
          /*static*/ QString MyClass::methodB(const QString & val){/*do something*/ }
          /*static*/ QString MyClass::methodC(const QString & val){/*do something*/ }
          void MyClass::runCalculation(){
          QStringList myList;
          // fill the list
          QFuture<QString> futRes = QtConcurrent::mappedReduced(
          myList.cbegin(),myList.cend(),
          [](const QString & val)->std::tuple<QString,QString,QString>{return std::make_tuple(MyClass::methodA(val),MyClass::methodB(val),MyClass::methodC(val));}
          , [](QString& base,const QString & result){base+=result;}
          );
          
          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mr Gisa
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @VRonin I forgot to mention two things:
          1 - The methods are in different classes.
          2 - It may exist one or more than one methods, maybe even ten, the thing is that I have a collection of objects and all of them implement the same method called search, I want to call the search method from all the objects concurrently and get their results in a single list.

          VRoninV 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mr Gisa

            @VRonin I forgot to mention two things:
            1 - The methods are in different classes.
            2 - It may exist one or more than one methods, maybe even ten, the thing is that I have a collection of objects and all of them implement the same method called search, I want to call the search method from all the objects concurrently and get their results in a single list.

            VRoninV Offline
            VRoninV Offline
            VRonin
            wrote on last edited by VRonin
            #5

            @Mr-Gisa said in Combine QtConcurrent call:

            objects and all of them implement the same method called search

            Looks like you are describing a problem C++ was born to solve: polymorphism

            • Are they QObjects (or, at least Q_GADGETs)?
            • Do they all inherit from the same base class that implements a virtual method called search?

            If both answers are no then I'm afraid you are out of luck

            "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
            ~Napoleon Bonaparte

            On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              Asperamanca
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              How about this:

              • Create a wrapper class that takes a std::function as a parameter
              • Offer a public method on that class that will run whatever std::function is set, and store the resulting string in a member variable
              • Create a list of those wrapper classes and set the correct functions on each
              • Use the list in QtConcurrent::map or similar
              • Read the string results from the members of the wrapper classes
              VRoninV 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Asperamanca

                How about this:

                • Create a wrapper class that takes a std::function as a parameter
                • Offer a public method on that class that will run whatever std::function is set, and store the resulting string in a member variable
                • Create a list of those wrapper classes and set the correct functions on each
                • Use the list in QtConcurrent::map or similar
                • Read the string results from the members of the wrapper classes
                VRoninV Offline
                VRoninV Offline
                VRonin
                wrote on last edited by VRonin
                #7

                Good idea but it think it can't be compiled (I did not test). std::function is a template and needs to be fully qualified. So you either:

                • specify the template parameters of the wrapper member fixing what function search must be
                • make the wrapper a template but then you can't store different specialisations of the same template in the same container

                I still think polymorphism is not just the right answer here but the only acceptable one

                @Mr-Gisa
                can you give us a rough example of what "collection" and "objects" means in your case?

                "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
                ~Napoleon Bonaparte

                On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

                A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • VRoninV VRonin

                  Good idea but it think it can't be compiled (I did not test). std::function is a template and needs to be fully qualified. So you either:

                  • specify the template parameters of the wrapper member fixing what function search must be
                  • make the wrapper a template but then you can't store different specialisations of the same template in the same container

                  I still think polymorphism is not just the right answer here but the only acceptable one

                  @Mr-Gisa
                  can you give us a rough example of what "collection" and "objects" means in your case?

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Asperamanca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @VRonin said in Combine QtConcurrent call:

                  Good idea but it think it can't be compiled (I did not test). std::function is a template and needs to be fully qualified. So you either:

                  • specify the template parameters of the wrapper member fixing what function search must be
                  • make the wrapper a template but then you can't store different specialisations of the same template in the same container

                  I still think polymorphism is not just the right answer here but the only acceptable one

                  @Mr-Gisa
                  can you give us a rough example of what "collection" and "objects" means in your case?

                  Well, OP didn't specify whether the methods have different signatures. But even if they have, you may be able to use

                  std::function<QString()>
                  

                  and provide the needed parameter in the bind call, like so:

                  auto myFunction = std::bind(&MyClass::MyMethod1,this,parameter1,parameter2,parameter3);
                  

                  Assuming MyMethod returns a string, that should work.

                  VRoninV 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • A Asperamanca

                    @VRonin said in Combine QtConcurrent call:

                    Good idea but it think it can't be compiled (I did not test). std::function is a template and needs to be fully qualified. So you either:

                    • specify the template parameters of the wrapper member fixing what function search must be
                    • make the wrapper a template but then you can't store different specialisations of the same template in the same container

                    I still think polymorphism is not just the right answer here but the only acceptable one

                    @Mr-Gisa
                    can you give us a rough example of what "collection" and "objects" means in your case?

                    Well, OP didn't specify whether the methods have different signatures. But even if they have, you may be able to use

                    std::function<QString()>
                    

                    and provide the needed parameter in the bind call, like so:

                    auto myFunction = std::bind(&MyClass::MyMethod1,this,parameter1,parameter2,parameter3);
                    

                    Assuming MyMethod returns a string, that should work.

                    VRoninV Offline
                    VRoninV Offline
                    VRonin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @Asperamanca said in Combine QtConcurrent call:

                    you may be able to use std::function<QString()>

                    Variadic template specialisation is just too much for my little brain to process. I'm still not convinced but certainly not smart enough to say it's defenetly not going to work

                    "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
                    ~Napoleon Bonaparte

                    On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • VRoninV VRonin

                      @Asperamanca said in Combine QtConcurrent call:

                      you may be able to use std::function<QString()>

                      Variadic template specialisation is just too much for my little brain to process. I'm still not convinced but certainly not smart enough to say it's defenetly not going to work

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Asperamanca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @VRonin
                      I think both approaches would work in this case. If OP says he has different classes, but each has a "Search" method, creating a "Searchable" interface and making the Search method virtual sounds like a good approach.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mr Gisa
                        wrote on last edited by Mr Gisa
                        #11

                        @Asperamanca @VRonin I think that the best way for me to explain in showing some code. This is an example of what I'm planning to do.

                        And beforehand: I put the classes instances in a container cause each one of those classes will be a plugin and will be loaded using QPluginLoader later on, so in order to minimize the problem I just put it in a kind of container.

                        Here you can see the example code: https://pastebin.com/raw/7BwgppwQ

                        As I will be processing heavy operations (like http requests, parsing, etc) in each search method I wanted to call it asynchronously and so I though that Qt Concurrent would help me with that.
                        And another thing: as I want the result of all the classes into a single QList I put a QString inside the Result struct to identify the site that it has been found (maybe I could use the pointer like QModelIndex does?).

                        So yeah, that is what I want to do.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • VRoninV Offline
                          VRoninV Offline
                          VRonin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          One thing is missing before we can write the solution: what should be passed as argument to search()?

                          Also keep in mind that accessing the values in the container before the end of the concurrent process is a race condition

                          "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
                          ~Napoleon Bonaparte

                          On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mr Gisa
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            The argument is just a string that will be used as query, this is just a prototype. But it's just a string.

                            Also keep in mind that accessing the values in the container before the end of the concurrent process is a race condition.

                            I want to create a kind of real time searcher, like when the user type a query it will async call all the search method from all the websites and in real time while it's finding the results I want to put all the results in a list view.

                            VRoninV 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Mr Gisa

                              The argument is just a string that will be used as query, this is just a prototype. But it's just a string.

                              Also keep in mind that accessing the values in the container before the end of the concurrent process is a race condition.

                              I want to create a kind of real time searcher, like when the user type a query it will async call all the search method from all the websites and in real time while it's finding the results I want to put all the results in a list view.

                              VRoninV Offline
                              VRoninV Offline
                              VRonin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              https://pastebin.com/mBTpAaAB

                              "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
                              ~Napoleon Bonaparte

                              On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • VRoninV VRonin

                                https://pastebin.com/mBTpAaAB

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mr Gisa
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                @VRonin Is it too early to say that I'm falling in love with you even without calling you out for dinner? haha, just kidding, you rock!!!
                                Thank you very much.
                                Just one last question:
                                Probably I will create a custom model and delegate to display the items so I was wondering, if I want to create a kind of status for each Result and update them in real time on the view I have to use a kind of struct inside the Result with the status types and use signals and slots to update that right?

                                VRoninV 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Mr Gisa

                                  @VRonin Is it too early to say that I'm falling in love with you even without calling you out for dinner? haha, just kidding, you rock!!!
                                  Thank you very much.
                                  Just one last question:
                                  Probably I will create a custom model and delegate to display the items so I was wondering, if I want to create a kind of status for each Result and update them in real time on the view I have to use a kind of struct inside the Result with the status types and use signals and slots to update that right?

                                  VRoninV Offline
                                  VRoninV Offline
                                  VRonin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @Mr-Gisa said in Combine QtConcurrent call:

                                  update them in real time on the view

                                  You'd have to store the result inside the ISearchable class and then use QFutureWatcher::resultAt, it's a bit more involved

                                  @Mr-Gisa said in Combine QtConcurrent call:

                                  Is it too early to say that I'm falling in love with you even without calling you out for dinner?

                                  Qt Forum is the new Tinder

                                  "La mort n'est rien, mais vivre vaincu et sans gloire, c'est mourir tous les jours"
                                  ~Napoleon Bonaparte

                                  On a crusade to banish setIndexWidget() from the holy land of Qt

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • VRoninV VRonin

                                    @Mr-Gisa said in Combine QtConcurrent call:

                                    update them in real time on the view

                                    You'd have to store the result inside the ISearchable class and then use QFutureWatcher::resultAt, it's a bit more involved

                                    @Mr-Gisa said in Combine QtConcurrent call:

                                    Is it too early to say that I'm falling in love with you even without calling you out for dinner?

                                    Qt Forum is the new Tinder

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mr Gisa
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @VRonin

                                    You'd have to store the result inside the ISearchable class and then use QFutureWatcher::resultAt, it's a bit more involved.

                                    I would love some help with that, for real.

                                    I was reading the docs and I saw that Qt has QFutureSynchronizer that syncs multiple QFuture, what is the difference between what we are doing here and QFutureSynchronizer ?

                                    I changed the sleep time of SiteA in order to check what happens and it freezes even if SiteB finished already its results. I really wanted that to display to the list view right when the results are ready.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0

                                    • Login

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups
                                    • Search
                                    • Get Qt Extensions
                                    • Unsolved