Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Language Bindings
  4. Which license to use for PySide2 wheels stored in Bintray?

Which license to use for PySide2 wheels stored in Bintray?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Language Bindings
9 Posts 4 Posters 3.3k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Fredrik AverpilF Offline
    Fredrik AverpilF Offline
    Fredrik Averpil
    wrote on last edited by Fredrik Averpil
    #1

    I'm building wheels using Travis CI and AppVeyor in a public Github repository: https://github.com/fredrikaverpil/pyside2-wheels

    I'd like to upload those wheels to e.g. Bintray, and I must then specify a license. My Github project is under the MIT license and PySide2 seems to be under LGPL-2.1 license (?):
    https://codereview.qt-project.org/gitweb?p=pyside/pyside.git;a=blob_plain;f=COPYING;hb=HEAD

    What would be an appropriate license to use at Bintray?
    Right now I've just used LGPL-2.1 since that's what PySide2 has.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • SGaistS Offline
      SGaistS Offline
      SGaist
      Lifetime Qt Champion
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hi,

      @tekojo Can you provide information/direction about that matter ?

      Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
      Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • tekojoT Offline
        tekojoT Offline
        tekojo
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I'll ask, don't know off the top of my head. (looks like LGPLv2.1 to me, as that is the file in the folder)

        Fredrik AverpilF 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • tekojoT tekojo

          I'll ask, don't know off the top of my head. (looks like LGPLv2.1 to me, as that is the file in the folder)

          Fredrik AverpilF Offline
          Fredrik AverpilF Offline
          Fredrik Averpil
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @tekojo that would be great, thanks.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tekojoT Offline
            tekojoT Offline
            tekojo
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Project lead sick :/
            So for now it is LGPLv2.1 but it probably should go with the main Qt licensing (assuming it can be rolled forward to v3 licenses.

            I'll find out next week when the lead developer is back for sure.

            Fredrik AverpilF 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • tekojoT tekojo

              Project lead sick :/
              So for now it is LGPLv2.1 but it probably should go with the main Qt licensing (assuming it can be rolled forward to v3 licenses.

              I'll find out next week when the lead developer is back for sure.

              Fredrik AverpilF Offline
              Fredrik AverpilF Offline
              Fredrik Averpil
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @tekojo Ok, thanks!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • AlexBlascheA Offline
                AlexBlascheA Offline
                AlexBlasche
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Going forward Pyside2 will have the same license as Qt. We are talking about the LGPLv3, GPLv2+ and commercial licensing. Hope this helps.

                The required changes to the git repos will follow in the coming weeks.

                tekojoT 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • AlexBlascheA AlexBlasche

                  Going forward Pyside2 will have the same license as Qt. We are talking about the LGPLv3, GPLv2+ and commercial licensing. Hope this helps.

                  The required changes to the git repos will follow in the coming weeks.

                  tekojoT Offline
                  tekojoT Offline
                  tekojo
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Thanks @AlexBlasche !

                  Ping @Fredrik-Averpil

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Fredrik AverpilF Offline
                    Fredrik AverpilF Offline
                    Fredrik Averpil
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Ok thanks, I'm not sure which of those I should be using ... but I guess I'll just keep the GPLv2.1 license for now then.

                    https://bintray.com/fredrikaverpil/pyside2-wheels/pyside2

                    Cheers!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0

                    • Login

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups
                    • Search
                    • Get Qt Extensions
                    • Unsolved