Important: Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct
Qt documentation format
Alek Śmierciak last edited by
browsing a little through the oldest (Qt4.7) documentation on DevNet I came to a conclusion that previous format has had some benefits. For example, class members and methods in a table, with folding and ready hyperlinks to source code.
"QDate from Qt4.7":http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.7/qdate.html
"QDate from Qt5.0":http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtcore/qdate.html
Who gets to decide on the documentation format and is it possible to propose changes, perhaps in a "vote for" style?
Thanks for any input and thoughts,
Write to "web mailing list":http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/web or IRC channel.
Judging from the looks, current format is taken directly from QDoc, so it looks the same in Assistant and here.