QTableWidget QCheckbox extract values iteration

Kalbo85

The values of the table are save using QSettings, ans once the program starts, the values are loaded into the table in this way (just the first row)::

void StatusConfigPage::setStatusTable(){

    // Set Checkbox
    QSettings statusSettings("Rasper", "Interface");
    statusSettings.beginReadArray("status");

    for (int dataIndex = 0; dataIndex < dataClassArrayLength; dataIndex++){
        statusSettings.setArrayIndex(dataIndex);

        QTableWidgetItem *item = new QTableWidgetItem();
        item->data(Qt::CheckStateRole);
        statusTable->setItem(0, dataIndex, item);
        bool valueTemp;
        valueTemp = statusSettings.value("cellValue").toBool();
        if(valueTemp){
            item->setCheckState(Qt::Checked);
        } else {
            item->setCheckState(Qt::Unchecked);
        }
    }

After manipulating the values of the QCheckboxes, the ones of the first row set on statusTable are intended to be store in this way:

void StatusConfigPage::updateSettings(){

    QSettings statusSettings("Rasper", "Interface");

        statusSettings.beginWriteArray("status");

        for (int dataIndex = 0; dataIndex < dataClassArrayLength; dataIndex++) {
            statusSettings.setArrayIndex(dataIndex);

            bool valueTemp;

            QTableWidgetItem *item = statusTable->itemAt(0,dataIndex);
            if(item->checkState()==Qt::Checked){
                valueTemp = true;
            } else {
                valueTemp = false;
            }
            statusSettings.setValue("cellValue", valueTemp);
        }
            statusSettings.endArray();
}

I don't know exactly where or why, probably trying to save them (in updateSettings()), it is taking the value of the first element (statusTable->itemAt(0,dataIndex))) and saving it for the rest of the elements.

Thanks in advance!

SGaist

Hi and welcome to devnet,

ItemAt takes "on widget" coordinates.
What you want to use is the item function.

Kalbo85

Thanks SGaist,
it works now! I didn't see that the function itemAt was giving back the pointer.