Qt Forum

    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Unsolved

    Solved std::vector capacity inconsistencies

    General and Desktop
    2
    3
    167
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      KevLob last edited by KevLob

      Hello everyone,

      This is the first time I'm posting on this forum, so I hope I'll be clear enough and you can help me with this strange problem.

      I am using QT OpenGL on a Windows 10 64-bit to show pointcloud from a PLY file, that can have more than 8 million of points (each points contains the x, y, z coordinates, and the RGBA value). I can read the data from this type of file, and since I have to read more than one PLY file, I'm currently storing it in a vector of vector of float.

      The problem is that I have a bad_alloc error while reading the fourth file of 8 million points. To understand more what the problem really was, I have created a test project containing 28 line, in which I initialized a vector of float and I store the same float value in it.

      This is where the inconsistency is: on Windows 10, i can only initialized a vector of float with a max capacity of about 412 millions value, one more and I have a bad_alloc error. But after testing on Linux, I can push_back more than 1 billion floating value without any error whatsoever.

      My projects (the test one and the real one) are in release mode, and I am compiling with the c++14 configuration.

      Is there a restriction on Windows 10 that limit the number of data stored in a std::vector? If so, can I remove it, or at least raise it so that I can store more than 412 million floating value?

      Here's the .pro of the test project:

      QT += widgets core gui
      
      CONFIG += c++14
      
      QMAKE_CXXFLAGS -= -O2 -std=c++11 -std=gnu++11
      QMAKE_CXXFLAGS += -O2 -s -std=gnu++14
      QMAKE_LFLAGS -= -O1
      
      
      SOURCES += \
          main.cpp \
      

      And here's the main.cpp:

      #include <QtGui>
      
      using namespace std;
      
      int main(int argc, char *argv[])
      {
          Q_UNUSED(argc);
          Q_UNUSED(argv);
          vector<float> test(412174164);  //<-- Add one more and a bad_alloc error raise.
          qDebug() << "OK!";
          for(long long int i = 0; i < 1e8; ++i)
          {
              try
              {
                  test[i] = 0.15753f;
              }
              catch (const std::bad_alloc&)
              {
                  qDebug() << i;
                  while(true)
                      1;
                  return -1;
              }
          }
          qDebug() << "KO!";
      
      	return 0;
      }
      

      Thanks in advance for your help.

      JKSH 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JKSH
        JKSH Moderators @KevLob last edited by

        @KevLob said in std::vector capacity inconsistencies:

        I am using QT OpenGL on a Windows 10 64-bit

        Are you also building a 64-bit application? A 32-bit application in 64-bit Windows only has access to 2 GiB of RAM.

        vector<float> test(412174164);  //<-- Add one more and a bad_alloc error raise.
        

        This requires 1.5 GiB of contiguous memory. Do you have that amount of RAM available? Is your RAM fragmented?

        Qt Doc Search for browsers: forum.qt.io/topic/35616/web-browser-extension-for-improved-doc-searches

        K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
        • K
          KevLob @JKSH last edited by

          @JKSH said in std::vector capacity inconsistencies:

          @KevLob said in std::vector capacity inconsistencies:

          I am using QT OpenGL on a Windows 10 64-bit

          Are you also building a 64-bit application? A 32-bit application in 64-bit Windows only has access to 2 GiB of RAM.

          Oh... I feel stupid now. I was using MinGW 32-bit to build the application. I have changed it to MinGW 64-bit and I can now store more than a billion value.

          Thank you.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post