Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Get Qt Extensions
  • Unsolved
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Qt Development
  3. Mobile and Embedded
  4. Qt framework for 64MB RAM platform
Forum Updated to NodeBB v4.3 + New Features

Qt framework for 64MB RAM platform

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Mobile and Embedded
3 Posts 2 Posters 727 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    ale82
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi All,
    I'm using a Linux Board with 64MB RAM.
    An empty Qt application, just a simple window, takes 17 MB, so about 27% just for loading the QtCore and QtGui.
    Obviously It will increase the size by the time adding stuff, so I'm afraid to overcome massively half the memory size, leaving few space for other applications and generally making the whole system slow and few reactive.
    Anyone can tell me if I can use Qt for this kind of systems and if there is some way to reduce memory consumption?

    Thanks everybody!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • SGaistS Offline
      SGaistS Offline
      SGaist
      Lifetime Qt Champion
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hi,

      For such constrained platform what you can try is to build a custom version of Qt that will only contain what your need. Look ath the "managing large numbers of features":http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/fine-tuning-features.html#managing-large-numbers-of-features document. It's for Qt 4 but IIRC it's still applicable for Qt 5. However such exotic configurations for Qt 5 are not actively tested so you might hit corner cases.

      Hope it helps

      Interested in AI ? www.idiap.ch
      Please read the Qt Code of Conduct - https://forum.qt.io/topic/113070/qt-code-of-conduct

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        ale82
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I will give a look, I don't want to use Qt5 for the moment.
        Thank you, I'll let you know.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups
        • Search
        • Get Qt Extensions
        • Unsolved