QHBoxLayout, QVBoxLayout, QBoxLayout or other?

mrjj

Hi
Did you check out
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qformlayout.html#details

its what i often use for xxx | yyy layouts.

JonB

@mostefa , @mrjj
Thanks for suggestions, will investigate.

Could you just comment on: if code does use QVboxLayout parent + multiple-QHboxLayout children, and the QHBoxLayouts each have multiple (but same number of) widgets added to them, do the "columns" of child widgets actually line up? I.e. does Qt left to itself do anything about making sibling QHBoxLayouts have same column widths? Otherwise perhaps in existing code they are just divided up like 50% each for two, so they line up, or perhaps existing code sets fixed widths?

mostefa

@JNBarchan said in QHBoxLayout, QVBoxLayout, QBoxLayout or other?:

if code does use QVboxLayout parent + multiple-QHboxLayout children, and the QHBoxLayouts each have multiple (but same number of) widgets added to them, do the "columns" of child widgets actually line up? I.e. does Qt left to itself do anything about making sibling QHBoxLayouts have same column widths?

if code does use QVboxLayout parent + multiple-QHboxLayout children, and the QHBoxLayouts each have multiple (but same number of) widgets added to them, do the "columns" of child widgets actually line up?

No, there is no automatic alignement in this case , you can achieve a good alignement , but you have to play with (column stretch , row stretch...)

Trust me using QGridLayout , or QFormLayout will offer you more comfort , by using one of them you can maintain your code more easily in the future.

JonB

@mostefa
Thanks, that (lack of alignemnt in separate QHBoxLayouts) confirms what I suspected.

I will indeed look at using QGridLayout/QFormLayout for new code I write. My question was because I wonder how the existing code has achieved columnar layout using only QV/HBoxLayout, when i don't fancy trawling through it all to understand. I have a feeling it might be using fixed-width columns on each QHBoxLayout and that's how they achieved the alignment, but it doesn't matter going forward.

mzimmers

@JNBarchan my two cents worth is to use the form layout. The code you mentioned, if it didn't use forms or grids, probably used some other constructs (like setting fixed sizes) to get the alignment you saw. Anyway, forms are meant for just what you're doing. Grids would be fine too.

JonB

OK then in that case, anyone care to summarize the difference of QGridLayout versus QFormLayout, e.g. which one is one more lightweight for my presumably minimal needs?

mzimmers

@JNBarchan well QFormLayout is a two-column layout designed for input devices and their labels...seems precisely right for you. QGridLayout is more general purpose. In actuality, I'd expect the difference in coding effort and performance to be minimal, but you might as well use something that's tailor-made for your purpose.

JonB

@mzimmers

designed for input devices and their labels
By "devices" do you mean "controls/widgets"?

I think you're saying QFormLayout is for:

Label1     Input1
Label2     Combo2
Label3     Checkbox3

I see the point of that. Funnily enough, though, although I (presently, but might change) do have 2 columns, it's a bit different here, it's something like

Button1    Explanatory text of why you might like to click the button :)
Button2    Explanatory text ....

Since I'm not really sure what I might end up with, but I know there will be columnar alignment required whatever, I might rather look into QGridLayout....

mzimmers

Yes, you did a better job wording it than I did. If you need the option of adding additional columns, then you'll want to use QGridLayout.

mranger90

Slightly off topic, but if all you want to display is an explanation of the proper usage for the button, why not use a tool tip? That's what a tool tip is supposed to do without taking up screen real estate.

JonB

@mranger90
Because my stakeholders/users demand an on-screen explanation in this context. (Screen estate is not limited because this is the totality of this page.) Because they are fussy, pampered users who won't look at a tooltip (won't even see it --- "You mean I have to move the mouse?") and will moan if the layout is not exactly what they have decided they want, claiming they cannot possibly know what the buttons might do.

Not nice friendly, co-operative, open-minded, tolerant developers.

Get the picture? ;-)