Unsolved tableView on apache server
-
Thanx for the info, VRonin.
In the mean time, i guess I will try to accomplish what I intended to do with html table and cgi
programming... -
Update: As always, I was wrong
It is actually already available I just did not know it. You can compile C++ code into asm.js (a compiled subset of JavaScript) and make it run on any current browser.You can find here a few examples running C++/Qt inside a browser. The apps run at around half the speed of a normal C++ compiled binary
-
@VRonin, I wouldn't say you were wrong, these are different possibilities to achieve the same end result.
-
@SGaist said in tableView on apache server:
@VRonin, I wouldn't say you were wrong
@VRonin said in tableView on apache server:
Currently it's not possible
Yes I was :)
-
I was thinking about providing a "Qt only" solution :)
-
-
@peterlin82 from that link:
We use emscripten to cross compile Qt5 into javascript and/or webassembly.
So it's the same basic principle as asm.js, the performance hit is significant.
On the other hand, the WebGL solution (http://blog.qt.io/blog/2017/02/22/qt-quick-webgl-streaming/) planned for Qt 5.10 looks a lot more promising
-
i think both webgl streaming & Web Assembly (WASM) are needed.
With both you really want anything that is QML / QT Quick to be supported and not support Qt Widgets and the old stuff, but i guess thats for the QT team to decide as its they that know their user usage matrix.
WebGL streaming is great for the quick and dirty where latency is not a killer.
- Its also perfect where you really want to protetc your code and want zero setup time for users. Its just connect (pull base lib) and get streaming.
- But on the server you will not be able to scale out to 100,00 users because each user is an app running on the server
WASM is needed where you want the full options like
- server can be a restful server in the traditional sense in any language
- client has offline support and needs low latency
-
Just a couple of notes:
@joe-blue said in tableView on apache server:
But on the server you will not be able to scale out to 100,00 users because each user is an app running on the server
True but it's not the whole app run for every user but a lightweight web server
WASM is needed where you want the full options
Agree but since WASM is still not a thing yet we have to make do for now
-
I hope QT team do not give up Qt Widgets(Web Assembly).