You might enjoy devrant.com to blow off steam. I go there for that reason.
Note: People generally create anonymous accounts to allow themselves to really let out their frustrations.

@AnneRanch giving proper credit to library authors and doing advertisements are two different things.

The credits shall be easy to find i.e. an about box. It's nowhere written that you have to be prominent about which framework you use.

Hi,

AFAIR, you have to go to your Qt Account and open a ticket there to change your email.

Thank you all guys for replies. I glad that i can get such important help from kind people like you.

@KH-219Design said in Please, help with my first CV:

i could not decide what you were referring to with your "it"

Refered to that whole thing - (coding and exploring computer science)

But you should be using std::nose. QNose supports the non-standard call QNose::select(). The standard call for this is std::nose::pick().

@ghagot See https://wiki.qt.io/Online_Communities

There is a link to a Telegram group, as well as links to the mailing lists and IRC channels that @sierdzio mentioned.

Thank you for the input, I shall dive into this.

I didn't expect you or anyone to write all the code for this, especially for nothing, that is why I offered to pay whoever could help me get this to work.
I don't have the 5 or 6 years left it would take me to learn how to do all this!
I will take it from here....
Thanks for everything!

Hi @JKSH

Currently, I'm using Qt under GPL. Anyway, your explanation was quite clarifying. It's not my intention to close the source completely, I just want to make the improved version available for the paying users, so I think I can keep sticking with GPL.

Thanks for your response.

OK, thank you for your feedback.

Through CodeProject mailing list: https://www.fastcompany.com/90669478/we-hire-old-people-job-posting-for-software-developer-sparks-a-viral-conversation-about-ageism-in-tech
a similar topic.

Hi
well for some it could be an alternative.
I tested it out but was put off by the complete lack of
a Designer.
You would very fast end up with heaps of boilerplate code in a deeply nested
tree so that was for me 2 huge minuses.
To top that off, its using a very unknown language called dart and
while it might be better than javascript / insert any language, it also means
the only real help you have is the docs.

@Kent-Dorfman
Yup That is also Correct.
I am not in college and I am self-taught till now. I just do it for fun. And just helping peoples for free. And not obviously PRO at it

Online forums have become a haven for workers under cheap-A$$ managers who hire folks without the domain knowledge to do broad design

Yup that is truth.

@eyllanesc & mzimmers > prior to seeing your reply (eyll...) I did "a clean slate" try without any problem.
I seem to have become entangled somehow : in addition to the zipfiles in the main (non-build) folder I had QtQuickCalculator.pro.user, [QQC].qml and [QQC]Form.ui.qml - beats me what I did! Also had main.qml under Sources rather than Resources/. Groan.
Sorry to have unnecessarily bothered people with my own stupidity.
This deserves a [DELETE] rather than a [SOLVED] I think.

@JKSH ...and your attitude to blame it on me - I did not write it well - is so common and stinks

@AnneRanch said in General question about open source development:

@JKSH So if the "author" has no obligation to publish - how does that "protect" the user ?
If it is bad product I can see the "protection" , but it should be up to the user to decide.

In any case - there is something amiss in the concept of "free licensing" - it is like writing a book and not publish it. Silly.

You'll find there's nothing amiss when you understand its goals.

If an application/executable is a house, and the source code is the blueprints, then a traditional commercial license is like a property developer that says: "Pay me money and you can live in this house. But you are not allowed to look at the blueprints, you are not allowed to renovate or repair the house, and you are not allowed to replace even a single lightbulb."

Now, suppose someone invents a fancy home automation system.

If this system is released under the GPL, it says to the property developer, "You can use my system in the houses that you build. In return, you must give your buyers the blueprints (including the schematics of my automation system) and give them permission to renovate/repair/replace all parts of the house." If this system is released under the Lesser GPL, it says to the property developer, You can use my system in the houses that you build. In return, you must give your buyers access to the schematics of my automation system and give them permission to tinker with and replace the automation system.

So, when the inventor releases the home automation system under the GPL/LGPL, they are encouraging property developers to give the homebuyers more freedom.

@Kent-Dorfman Biker bar ? If I own, not ride, Huffy -will you let me in? ( See it is all in definition - "lounge" included )
I am not sure about reaction to this - czech lounge @ code project...